- Oct 15, 2008
- 19,375
- 7,273
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The other Star Wars thread went to the phantom zone with derailment talking about the prequels. It mostly was everyone except Gurney liking Episode III! Hey, can't accuse me of being a follower now, can you!? LOL
Anyway...I went to see the new Star Wars flick today. After all I have heard, read, and understood about this new movie, and the fact it had JJ Abrams (whom I can't stand!) directing it, I was inclined not to go watch it and save $40. Well, my boys wanted to see it so badly, my wife had a "why not? Don't be a stick in the mud!" kind of attitude, and everyone seemed hip...add to it all the fact I've never once missed a SW film in the theater, and I decided to bite...
I actually went in HOPING that it'd be the stellar, epic, glorious yarn that everyone has made it out to be.
Here was my observation list (some are the same as others in TAW)
secret info given to a droid that could change everything! (yawn, been there, done that, A New Hope)
a "star-killer" super station that can blow up planets (yawn again, seen that thing before called "Death Star")
characters were flat. Even Harrison Ford lacked spunk, interest, passion, or anything of his former self. He seemed like a grump AARP Star Wars token throw-back. Even his death was bland and didn't do much for me. Spielberg would've made us cry like babies if he could've controlled the scenes. Peter Jackson possibly, too. But JJ Abrams is cliche.
Kylo Ren--most uninteresting, cheesy, dufus-like villain I've yet seen. He didn't scare me, interest me, draw me in, create mystique, or arouse my curiosity. He seemed like a token "bad dude in black" as a nod to Lucas.
The "First Order" was never really explained well or given to us in any logical detail, so they seem like a meaningless entity to me. They're some kind of wannabe nod to the Empire of old. Remnants left over. Big deal. They didn't scare me. I saw no philosophy or interest there.
Supreme Leader Snoke---for all his bragging about very little CGI, this Snoke thing looked like a giant CGI copy of the Guardians from Green Lantern (2011 flick). He seemed phony and cheesy and not at all threatening. Dang, Ian McDiarmaid as the Emperor when I was a kid scared the poo out of me!
Silly quips. Annoying and too many of them.
Splitsville--to echo what Rusmeister said, the whole Han and Leia splitting up not being able to make it work was kind of sad and unnecessary. They followed the same tired and bland "tragedy happens to couple, couple can't cope, couple try to make it work but can't, couple split up over tragedy" pattern. Predictable and boring.
Han, Leia, Luke Skywalker---tokens. They were put into the flick to fill bums in seats. Leia was unnecessary and boring with crud dialogue. Sounded worse than Lucas prequels. Han was the best, but bland. Luke....the dude didn't even speak. Ugh.
Where was Lando!? Ok, I'm just being silly here.
What was the point of the film? It just seemed like JJ Abrams being JJ Abrams--homage, homage, homage, quips, unnecessary action and lasers, let them eat cake, filler, filler, filler.
The film offered very little that is new to us. Nothing here cannot already be experienced by watching A New Hope. The New Yorker had a brilliant article this week about how some people SHOULD look at the prequels again and cease the hate. Lucas has been lambasted and loathed by pretty much everyone except Mellody Hobson LOL for the past 20 years. He's received a lot of hate. And to some degree I get it--rethinking and rethinking and rethinking his own vision, changing things over and over, and people can't stand his prequels. I think the prequels hate is almost a fad. People want to hate the prequels because it's just cool to hate on them. It's like Justin Beiber or the Kardashians. Once you find they're hate material, loathe em!
Well, the New Yorker article pointed out that people should at least respect the fact that Lucas was usually trying to try new things and go into new territory. The prequels weren't the same exact formula from the old trilogy. He tried new approaches, new characters with totally different values and problems. yeah, too much CGI and bad casting and other issues were there to screw things up, but the stories were WAY better than The Force Awakens.
The Force Awakens didn't have Lucas, it was Star Wars, and it was going to have original cast. It couldn't lose. Americans are just that simple a people.
"No Lucas? Old cast? Star Wars? I can overlook a bland script and poor acting as well as intense predictability! It's Star Wars, man! Oh JJ Abrams is in charge! Yippee!"
I just don't understand what people saw in this flick? I'm going to be interested to see if Abrams can ever actually go out on his own and create something cerebrally-stimulating AT ALL. Take Star Trek the reboot he did. Typical of Abrams. You take something that has already been made--Star Trek...and you repackage it with lots of quips, one-liners, huge budget, fancy CGI, action up the ying-yang, but really no depth, and don't carry on the vision in a meaningful way, and people gobble it up. When he tried to make the SECOND Star Trek film, Into Darkness, again it had some nods and relied on Roddenberry's infrastructure, but it was his attempt to carry it somewhere, and it fell flat! I'll be fascinated to see what he attempts to do with Star Wars next. I just can't believe Kasdan was involved in this boring script.
My kids asked me, "daddy, what was your favorite part of the movie?" I told them I honestly could've think of one. Hell, even the prequels everyone hates in here had cool moments for me. I can point out cool stuff in Clones or Phantom Menace even! Not in this one.
Self-fullfilling prophecy movie-going----"dang it! This movie IS going to be epic!" and so it is.....
Anyway...I went to see the new Star Wars flick today. After all I have heard, read, and understood about this new movie, and the fact it had JJ Abrams (whom I can't stand!) directing it, I was inclined not to go watch it and save $40. Well, my boys wanted to see it so badly, my wife had a "why not? Don't be a stick in the mud!" kind of attitude, and everyone seemed hip...add to it all the fact I've never once missed a SW film in the theater, and I decided to bite...
I actually went in HOPING that it'd be the stellar, epic, glorious yarn that everyone has made it out to be.
Here was my observation list (some are the same as others in TAW)
secret info given to a droid that could change everything! (yawn, been there, done that, A New Hope)
a "star-killer" super station that can blow up planets (yawn again, seen that thing before called "Death Star")
characters were flat. Even Harrison Ford lacked spunk, interest, passion, or anything of his former self. He seemed like a grump AARP Star Wars token throw-back. Even his death was bland and didn't do much for me. Spielberg would've made us cry like babies if he could've controlled the scenes. Peter Jackson possibly, too. But JJ Abrams is cliche.
Kylo Ren--most uninteresting, cheesy, dufus-like villain I've yet seen. He didn't scare me, interest me, draw me in, create mystique, or arouse my curiosity. He seemed like a token "bad dude in black" as a nod to Lucas.
The "First Order" was never really explained well or given to us in any logical detail, so they seem like a meaningless entity to me. They're some kind of wannabe nod to the Empire of old. Remnants left over. Big deal. They didn't scare me. I saw no philosophy or interest there.
Supreme Leader Snoke---for all his bragging about very little CGI, this Snoke thing looked like a giant CGI copy of the Guardians from Green Lantern (2011 flick). He seemed phony and cheesy and not at all threatening. Dang, Ian McDiarmaid as the Emperor when I was a kid scared the poo out of me!
Silly quips. Annoying and too many of them.
Splitsville--to echo what Rusmeister said, the whole Han and Leia splitting up not being able to make it work was kind of sad and unnecessary. They followed the same tired and bland "tragedy happens to couple, couple can't cope, couple try to make it work but can't, couple split up over tragedy" pattern. Predictable and boring.
Han, Leia, Luke Skywalker---tokens. They were put into the flick to fill bums in seats. Leia was unnecessary and boring with crud dialogue. Sounded worse than Lucas prequels. Han was the best, but bland. Luke....the dude didn't even speak. Ugh.
Where was Lando!? Ok, I'm just being silly here.
What was the point of the film? It just seemed like JJ Abrams being JJ Abrams--homage, homage, homage, quips, unnecessary action and lasers, let them eat cake, filler, filler, filler.
The film offered very little that is new to us. Nothing here cannot already be experienced by watching A New Hope. The New Yorker had a brilliant article this week about how some people SHOULD look at the prequels again and cease the hate. Lucas has been lambasted and loathed by pretty much everyone except Mellody Hobson LOL for the past 20 years. He's received a lot of hate. And to some degree I get it--rethinking and rethinking and rethinking his own vision, changing things over and over, and people can't stand his prequels. I think the prequels hate is almost a fad. People want to hate the prequels because it's just cool to hate on them. It's like Justin Beiber or the Kardashians. Once you find they're hate material, loathe em!
Well, the New Yorker article pointed out that people should at least respect the fact that Lucas was usually trying to try new things and go into new territory. The prequels weren't the same exact formula from the old trilogy. He tried new approaches, new characters with totally different values and problems. yeah, too much CGI and bad casting and other issues were there to screw things up, but the stories were WAY better than The Force Awakens.
The Force Awakens didn't have Lucas, it was Star Wars, and it was going to have original cast. It couldn't lose. Americans are just that simple a people.
"No Lucas? Old cast? Star Wars? I can overlook a bland script and poor acting as well as intense predictability! It's Star Wars, man! Oh JJ Abrams is in charge! Yippee!"
I just don't understand what people saw in this flick? I'm going to be interested to see if Abrams can ever actually go out on his own and create something cerebrally-stimulating AT ALL. Take Star Trek the reboot he did. Typical of Abrams. You take something that has already been made--Star Trek...and you repackage it with lots of quips, one-liners, huge budget, fancy CGI, action up the ying-yang, but really no depth, and don't carry on the vision in a meaningful way, and people gobble it up. When he tried to make the SECOND Star Trek film, Into Darkness, again it had some nods and relied on Roddenberry's infrastructure, but it was his attempt to carry it somewhere, and it fell flat! I'll be fascinated to see what he attempts to do with Star Wars next. I just can't believe Kasdan was involved in this boring script.
My kids asked me, "daddy, what was your favorite part of the movie?" I told them I honestly could've think of one. Hell, even the prequels everyone hates in here had cool moments for me. I can point out cool stuff in Clones or Phantom Menace even! Not in this one.
Self-fullfilling prophecy movie-going----"dang it! This movie IS going to be epic!" and so it is.....