I have always been told that speakin gin tounges was not biblical. Can anyone tell me if it is or not?
thanks
thanks
The Gift of Tongues is Biblical however it ceased a very long time ago! People cannot speak in tongues nowadays!!yanirocket said:I have always been told that speakin gin tounges was not biblical. Can anyone tell me if it is or not?
thanks
Shew me that it is for today!LADY DI said:I believe speaking in tongues is a gift.
Some have it and some don't.
89rn j3j95y7 we354fq3rq9jeoqo 84..........Oops, technically I guess that is typing in tongues, either that or I had my fingers on the wrong row of keys.AV1611 said:Shew me that it is for today!
Asaph said:89rn j3j95y7 we354fq3rq9jeoqo 84..........Oops, technically I guess that is typing in tongues, either that or I had my fingers on the wrong row of keys.
Actually AV1611, the burden of proof lies with you, since so far every other post has affirmed the gift. I am curious if there is more than just the one reference to the ceasing of tongues, which gives no time frame that I can recall. Are there other scriptures?
Grace and Peace,
Asaph
sunshinejennii said:I believe some people have the gift of speaking in tongues, my mum does and i used to find it scary when i was little because i didnt understand what was happening. However I also believe that some people speak in demonic tongues, they believe it is from God but it isnt.
I beg to differ. If you are all saying that it does exist then surely you should be able to shew me the Biblical references that it is for today and has not ceased?Asaph said:Actually AV1611, the burden of proof lies with you, since so far every other post has affirmed the gift.
Grace and Peace,
Asaph
The book of Acts establishes clearly that biblical tongues were languages (Acts 2:6, 8, 11). The tongues of Acts and Corinthians were the same. There is absolutely no evidence that the tongues of Corinthians were different from the ones in Acts or that they were angelic languages. 1 Corinthians 13:1 shows that tongues were a temporary sign gift. Tongues were a part of the miraculous era of Christ and the apostles and were necessary, along with the gift of miracles, as an authenticating sign of the apostles (2 Corinthians 12:12). Tongues were a sign gift belonging to the infancy stage of the church and they were used as a sign to unbelieving Jews and in this sense were used in evangelism.
Does she know what she says?sunshinejennii said:I believe some people have the gift of speaking in tongues, my mum does...
Do you know what you are saying when you do?9-iron said:Arguement against tongues: It doesn't exist and if you are doing it your not in line with scripture.....
Yes, I pray in tongues.
Not a single one of your references said that tongues, or for that matter, any spiritual gift had ceased.AV1611 said:I beg to differ. If you are all saying that it does exist then surely you should be able to shew me the Biblical references that it is for today and has not ceased?
My argument is summarised thus:
Since we now no longer need any signs to authenticate apostles tongues are not needed. Furthermore because tongues are related to Israel and Israel has been temporarily set aside they are nolonger needed and so have ceased. See: http://www.bereanbiblesociety.org/articles/1064006213.htmlhttp://www.bereanbiblesociety.org/articles/1064006213.html