Who said anything about being unwelcoming? I said you look after the people in your house first before people outside. After everyone inside your house is well cared for, you can seek to help others outside.
This is a different thing from Christian Nationalism. With the Good Samaritan, did he look after himself first or put his own safety and comfort at risk for the sake of the beaten man?
You yourself live by these principles all the time. We all do.
I fail at living up to the ideal of Christian ethics, but that's no reason to embrace tribalistic political philosophies.
How many strangers are you going to invite into your home? And why selfishly keep it as your home? It would be "hate" not to give your home away for others to live in, right? Because if not that would mean you are prioritizing yourself over others, and according to you that is hate...
Did Jesus not say "sell all your possessions, and give them to the poor"? It's a perfection that we can never live up to, but that's no reason to compromise.
Well, why aren't you out there giving away all of your stuff to people on the street? Why are you selfishly holding onto things like internet devices, or spending money on a special apartment, room, or house for yourself? This is silly of course, because obviously we all prioritize taking care of ourselves and the people around us, before those people and things further away from us.
Because I, like every other Christian, am a hypocrite. But we're talking about ideals and ethics, the mirror we hold ourselves up to and see how desperately sinful we are and in need of Christ. We don't need to introduce or excuse philosophical movements that ask us to compromise the ethical foundations of our faith. I may not be able to live up to these ideals, but that's no reason to compromise them.
This isn't "hate", it's just the basic ordering of reality.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "this" here, because the hate I speak of is the inherent "us vs them" mentality that is involved in Christian Nationalism. The ethic that says that just because the person in need isn't an associate of mine, I'm more deserving of the blessings of God than they are. The one that fails to recognize "there but for the grace of God go I" and instead divides people up based on geographic location or acceptance of faith.
This is frustrating to me, because underneath this discussion I hear the rationalizations for allowing unchecked mass immigration into the USA, and the wagging finger that one is "hateful" for not welcoming it. (and the one wagging the finger is usually the furthest removed from its consequences) It's an extremely hostile act upon one's existing neighbors, masquerading as charity.
There's certainly a need to discuss what the loving action is regarding those seeking asylum or migrating to the US illegally. But shutting our hearts out on those people and not recognizing that through no fault of their own they were born in less fortunate circumstances and are merely seeking to improve their lives is insensitive at the very least, and hateful at worst. At the end of the day, these questions are more complicated than boiling them down to simple solutions and a lack of humanitarian concern for the immigrants is unloving. What the solution is, I certainly don't know. I don't think it's unchecked mass immigration, but I do think we need to do something to improve their situation considering the position we are in as a country.
.png)
