• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  2. The forums in the Christian Congregations category are now open only to Christian members. Please review our current Faith Groups list for information on which faith groups are considered to be Christian faiths. Christian members please remember to read the Statement of Purpose threads for each forum within Christian Congregations before posting in the forum.

Science-Mankind's Ongoing Search for Truth - Part 2

Discussion in 'Creation & Evolution' started by LightBearer, Nov 14, 2002.

  1. LightBearer

    LightBearer Veteran

    +19
    Jehovahs Witness
    Science-Mankind's Ongoing Search for Truth - Part 2

    The Search Begins

    "NO ONE knows who first discovered fire, invented the wheel, developed the bow and arrow, or tried to explain the rising and the setting of the sun," notes The World Book Encyclopedia. But discovered, invented, developed, and explained they were, and the world has never been the same since.

    These accomplishments were early steps on a journey in search of truth that by now has lasted some six thousand years. Humans have always been curious, wanting to understand the living and nonliving things in the world around them. They have also been interested in applying what they learn, using it in a practical way to benefit themselves. This inborn thirst for knowledge and the desire to apply it have been driving forces in mankind's ongoing search for scientific truth.

    Of course, those first attempts to put scientific knowledge to practical use were not called technology, as it is known today. For that matter neither were the individuals who made such attempts called scientists. In fact, science in its modern sense did not even exist during the greater part of mankind's existence. As late as the 14th century, when the English poet Chaucer used the word "science," he simply meant all the different kinds of knowledge. This was in harmony with the word's etymology, which goes back to a Latin term meaning "to know."

    The First Zoologist Leads the Way

    Regardless of what it was originally called, science got its start in the garden of Eden as soon as humans began investigating the world around them. Even before Eve's creation, Adam was commissioned to give the animals names. To assign them appropriate names required that he carefully study their characteristics and their habits. Today, we call this the science of zoology. Genesis 2:19.

    Adam and Eve's first child, Cain, "engaged in building a city," so he must have had sufficient scientific knowledge to develop necessary tools. Later, one of his descendants, Tubal-cain, was called "the forger of every sort of tool of copper and iron." By then scientific knowledge and technology had obviously increased. Genesis 4:17-22.

    By the time Egypt became a world power-the first mentioned in the Bible-scientific knowledge had progressed to the point that the Egyptians were able to construct giant pyramids. The design of these pyramids, says The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, "was successfully achieved only after much experimentation, in which great engineering problems were solved." Solving these problems required a substantial knowledge of mathematics and indicated the existence of certain related scientific skills.

    Of course, scientific curiosity was not limited to just the Egyptians. The Babylonians, besides developing a calendar, set up numbering and measuring systems. In the Far East, the Chinese civilization made valuable scientific contributions. And the early forefathers of the Incas and the Mayas in the Americas developed an advanced civilization that later surprised European explorers, who hardly expected such achievements by "backward natives."

    Not everything these ancient peoples originally viewed as scientific truth, however, turned out to be scientifically correct. The World Book Encyclopedia tells us that alongside the useful tools the Babylonians produced for scientific research, "they also developed the pseudoscience of astrology."

    Babylon Is Everywhere

    To Bible students ancient Babylon is synonymous with false worship. In the astrology that was practiced there, a different god was believed to rule over each section of the heavens. The Bible, which teaches that there is but one true God, is scientifically correct when it rejects the pseudoscience known as astrology. Deuteronomy 18:10-12; 1 Corinthians 8:6; 12:6; Ephesians 4:6.

    Religion was an integral part of the life of early man. So it is understandable that scientific knowledge did not develop apart from religious beliefs and ideas. This can particularly be seen in the realm of medical science.

    "Ancient documents illustrating Egyptian society and medicine during the Old Kingdom," says The New Encyclopaedia Britannica, "show that magic and religion were integrally associated with empiricorational medical practice and that the chief magician of the pharaoh's court also frequently served as the nation's chief physician."

    During the third Egyptian dynasty, a noted architect named Imhotep gained prominence as a physician of no small skill. Less than a century after his death, he was worshiped as Egypt's god of medicine. By the end of the sixth century B.C.E., he had been elevated to the position of a major deity. The Britannica says that temples dedicated to him were "often crowded with sufferers who prayed and slept there with the conviction that the god would reveal remedies to them in their dreams."

    Egyptian and Babylonian healers were greatly influenced by religious ideas. "The prevailing theory of disease at that time, and for generations to come," says The Book of Popular Science, "was that fevers, infections, aches and pains were caused by evil spirits, or demons, invading the body." For that reason medical treatment generally involved religious offerings, spells, or incantations.

    In time, during the fourth and fifth centuries B.C.E., a Greek physician named Hippocrates challenged this view. He is particularly well-known because of the Hippocratic oath, still generally viewed as embodying the medical code of conduct. The book Moments of Discovery-The Origins of Science notes that Hippocrates was also "among the first to compete with the priests in finding explanation of man's sicknesses." Practicing medicine in the spirit of science, he sought natural causes for diseases. Reason and experience began to take the place of religious superstition and guesswork.

    In separating medicine from religious dogma, Hippocrates took a step in the right direction. Nevertheless, even today we are reminded of medicine's religious background. Its very symbol, the snake-entwined staff of Asclepius, the Greek god of medicine, can be traced back to the ancient temples of healing where sacred snakes were kept. According to The Encyclopedia of Religion, these snakes embodied "the capacity for renewal of life and rebirth in health."

    Hippocrates later became known as the father of medicine. But this did not prevent him from at times being scientifically incorrect. The Book of Popular Science tells us that some of his unsound notions "seem quite fantastic to us today" but cautions against medical arrogance, saying: "Some of the medical theories that are now most firmly established will probably seem just as fantastic to men of a future generation."

    Advancing Step-by-Step

    Thus, the discovery of scientific truth has been a gradual process, entailing the culling of facts from mistaken theories over centuries of time. But for this to be possible, the findings of one generation had to be accurately passed on to the next. One way of doing this, obviously, was by word of mouth, since humans were created with the power of speech. Compare Genesis 2:23.

    This method of passing on observations, however, would never have been reliable enough to provide the accuracy that scientific and technological advancement demand. There was clearly a need for preserving information in written form.

    Just when humans began to write is unknown. But once they did, they had at their disposal a marvelous process by which to pass on information upon which others could build. Before paper was invented-probably in China about 105 C.E.-writing was done on such things as clay tablets, papyrus, and parchment.

    Substantial scientific advancement would have been impossible without numbering and measuring systems. The importance of their development can hardly be exaggerated. Calling the applications of mathematics "universal in scope," The Book of Popular Science reminds us that "its analyses have led to many all-important scientific advances." Mathematics also serves "as an invaluable tool for the chemist, the physicist, the astronomer, the engineer and others."

    Over the centuries other factors have added momentum to the search for scientific truth. Travel, for example. The Book of Popular Science explains: "The man who makes his way to foreign lands is likely to find his curiosity sharpened by new sights, sounds, smells and tastes. He will be tempted to ask why things are so different in a strange land; and in his attempt to gratify his curiosity, he will acquire wisdom. So it was with the ancient Greeks."

    Yes, Those Ever-Present Greeks

    Read about the history of religion, politics, or commerce and you will find more than passing mention of the Greeks. And who has not heard of their famous philosophers, a term drawn from the Greek word phi·lo·so·phi'a, meaning "love of wisdom"? The Greeks' love of wisdom and thirst for knowledge was well-known in the first century when the Christian apostle Paul visited their country. He referred to Epicurean and Stoic philosophers, who like "all Athenians and the foreigners sojourning there would spend their leisure time at nothing but telling something or listening to something new."-Acts 17:18-21.

    So it is hardly surprising that of all ancient peoples, the Greeks left science the largest heritage. The New Encyclopaedia Britannica elaborates: "The attempt of Greek philosophy to provide a theory of the universe to replace the cosmologies of myth eventually led to practical scientific discoveries."

    In fact, some of the Greek philosophers made significant contributions to the search for scientific truth. They strove to weed out the erroneous ideas and theories of their predecessors, while at the same time building upon the basis of what they found to be correct. Therefore, the Greek philosophers of yesterday came the closest of any ancient people to thinking like the scientists of today. Incidentally, until relatively recent times, the term "natural philosophy" was used to describe the different branches of science.

    In time philosophy-loving Greece was overshadowed politically by the newly founded Roman Empire. Did this have any effect upon scientific progress? Or would the coming of Christianity make a difference? Part 3 tomorrow will answer.
     
    We teamed up with Faith Counseling. Can they help you today?
  2. lucaspa

    lucaspa Legend

    +373
    Methodist
    Private
    Oh great. A paen to science. From your reference to Adam and naming the animals in the Garden of Eden, I can anticipate the irony that this eulogy to science is going to end with rejecting the most extensively tested and supported theory in science today -- evolution.
     
  3. DNAunion

    DNAunion Active Member

    677
    +0
    DNAunion: To how many digits of precision has evolution been confirmed?


    DNAunion: And are you sure there aren't any theories in science today that are more extensively tested and/or more supported than evolution? What about the cell theory? What about Einstein's special theory of relativity? What about the kinetic theory of matter?
     
  4. seebs

    seebs God Made Me A Skeptic

    +1,462
    Seeker
    Married
    US-Republican
    Most theories that aren't about numbers, and as such, are not confirmed to "digits of precision".
     
  5. alphatronics

    alphatronics Member

    258
    +0
    Humanist
    US-Democrat
    I've heard that quantum mechanics is the most extensively tested, from an old professor of mine that specializes in that field.
     
  6. DNAunion

    DNAunion Active Member

    677
    +0
    DNAunion: Hey, I'm not arguing that evolution is bogus. Just that placing it up upon the highest point of the highest pedastal seems a tad bit sensationalist to me.
     
  7. DNAunion

    DNAunion Active Member

    677
    +0
    DNAunion: Hmmmm... are you suggesting that Lucaspa should have said something along the lines of...

    DNAunion: And of course, even that leaves the problem of Lucaspa's use of the superlatives.
     
  8. Morat

    Morat Untitled One

    +2
    Atheist
    "Digits of precision" is a misleading (and incorrect) notion of how to determine how well tested a theory is.

    Quantum mechanics is precise to about 13 decimal places, yet we know it is wrong (or at least, badly incomplete) because it yields false answers or no answers to certain questions (quantum gravity, anyone?).

    Evolution is heavily tested. Whether it's the most so or not is debatable, but not that it's one of the contenders. It's been subject to rigorous examination for 150 years. Magnitudes more so in the last 20, as DNA technology and biochemistry knowledge has advanced.

    Your personal complaint with Lucaspa notwithstanding.
     
  9. lucaspa

    lucaspa Legend

    +373
    Methodist
    Private
    Originally posted by DNAunion DNAunion: To how many digits of precision has evolution been confirmed?

    Well, from the FOX2P protein paper, 1 part in 6 billion.  The population genetics papers get very precise.

    DNAunion: And are you sure there aren't any theories in science today that are more extensively tested and/or more supported than evolution? What about the cell theory? What about Einstein's special theory of relativity? What about the kinetic theory of matter?

    Yep, I'm sure.  Remember, all the tests on cell theory are also testing evolution. The evolution of the cell.  Do your PubMed search on "evolution".  More papers on it than on special relativity.  And what is the "kinetic theory of matter"? I'm aware of a kinetic theory of gases, but not of all of matter.

    Also remember that all the papers on new drugs or treatments in medicine using animal models are also tests of evolution.
     
Loading...