http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...-use-forensics-reveal-Christ-looked-like.html
Science thinks that the face of Jesus looks like this...
Science thinks that the face of Jesus looks like this...
We all know Jesus had blonde hair, blue eyes and spoke with an English accent. Silly science!http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...-use-forensics-reveal-Christ-looked-like.html
Science thinks that the face of Jesus looks like this...
I believe that the shroud of Turin is closest!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...-use-forensics-reveal-Christ-looked-like.html
Science thinks that the face of Jesus looks like this...
"Science" does not. Forensic anthropologists do. There is a difference.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...-use-forensics-reveal-Christ-looked-like.html
Science thinks that the face of Jesus looks like this...
Well he definitely ain't blonde!This is considered to be the oldest surviving icon of Christ. It's at St. Catherine's Monastery on Mt. Sinai.
You're right, Jesus probably didn't look like this. This picture portrays someone who seems quite kept in appearance. Jesus would certainly not have had the wealth to be this groomed. Jesus would likely have been simply unshaven, this figure looks far too neat for an itinerant apocalypticist wandering the desert.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...-use-forensics-reveal-Christ-looked-like.html
Science thinks that the face of Jesus looks like this...
Agree. Do we really need to get bunched up over evvvvverything out there? It's an opinion. It's speculation. If it perhaps varies from our image or perception, must it therefore be an insulting attack?Someone beat me to it, but sometimes a point need repeating:
How is that "insulting"? I think that is either a poor choice of wording, or...
I don't really buy the Shroud of Turin, I've heard some dating for it places it within the medieval period.the shroud of Turin
I don't really buy the Shroud of Turin, I've heard some dating for it places it within the medieval period.