ArmenianJohn
Politically Liberal Christian Fundamentalist
- Jan 30, 2013
- 8,962
- 5,550
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
There's video of this case so it's clear to me what happened. Do you have video of the case in the OP? I didn't think so.Well forgive me for doubting your judgment in this case....
Father, son arrested and charged in killing of Ahmaud Arbery, GBI says
Here's a recent case where you were certain that the motive was racism. You didn't have any evidence for it. You didn't have the story from the shooter's point of view. You had a bunch of evidence that it was about a potential robbery....but you ignored all that because the shooter was white and the victim was black. You go on to repeat this assertion for several pages....
Now in this new case, you have an eyewitness who is claiming to have been at the scene and says it was racially motivated (and I'll admit, he could be biased, he could be wrong) and you won't even entertain the possibility that this was a racist hate crime.
Why the double standard? Is it just because the victim is white? Why do you automatically assume racism when the victim is black (in spite of evidence) but automatically deny racism when the victim is white (in spite of evidence)?
Upvote
0