- Aug 7, 2016
- 3,762
- 1,943
- 100
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
BABerean2 wrote:
"You are attempting to force the text to fit the system of interpretation that John Nelson Darby brought to America about the time of the Civil War. Since that time it has spread like a virus through much of the evangelical Church. Many now promoting the doctrine have no idea where it came from.
The New Covenant was promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34.
It is found fulfilled in Hebrews 8:6-13. It is specifically applied to the Church in Hebrews 12:18-24, and 2 Corinthians 3:6-8.
The Church and Israel cannot be separated within Hebrews 8:6-13.
We find in Hebrews 13:20 that the New Covenant is "everlasting". God will not go back and deal with the modern nation of Israel under the now "obsolete" Old Covenant system with Moses as the mediator, instead of Christ.
Therefore, John Darby's Two Peoples of God doctrine cannot be correct and must be rejected.
There is no pretrib removal of the Church so that God can go back and deal with the modern nation of Israel during a future time of 7 years.
In Hebrews 13:20 the New Covenant is "everlasting".
Therefore, the "Church Age" does not end before the Second Coming of Christ, as pretrib proponents claim."
.
You are the one who is forcing the Scriptures to say things it most certainly is not. It is full of eisegesis and faulty hermeneutics. There is nothing faulty with the covenants, but your understanding of them most certainly is. The everlasting New Covenant of Grace was first predicted/prophecied to Israel, in Jer.31:31-34. It was fulfilled/delivered by Jesus in Lk.20:22, to His disciples, made manifest at His death, in Lk.23:46. Beginning at the founding of His Church at Pentecost, in Acts 2:1-3.
From that point on, both Jews and Gentiles alike, who have believed/received Jess as their Lord and Savior, have also been baptised into the Church Jesus founded, by the Holy Spirit, in 1 Cor.12:12-13. While Israel rejected Jesus as their Messiahand have not yet participated in the New Covenant of Grace. Nor will they participate in it until the second coming of Christ, at the end of the seven years of tribulation, in Zech.12:10 and Zech.14:4-5. Those are the Scriptura facts and whyIsrael and the Church are two separate entities at this time.
As I have told you previously, Margaret MacDonald and Joh Darby DID NOT invent he pre-trib rapture of the Church. But rather, they RESTORED the teachings of it from being swept under the carpet by the RCC for more than 1,600 years, due to their teachings of Amillennialism that rejects both the 1,000 year reign of Jesus on earth as well as the pre-trib rapture of the Church. Go to the following link, consisting of four consecutive posts that reveal the BIBLICAL TEACHING OF THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE OF THE CHURCH, at my website below:
http://deeperwalk.lefora.com/topic/...he-pretrib-rapture-of-the-Church#.WOEMhaL_oa4
After you have read it all, either prove there is a single Scriptural fact you find to be false, with Scriptural support for it, or they are the true facts, as taught by Jesus, Matthew, Luke, John and Paul, and your views are false. One of the problems you have, is your mixing of the prophetic timing, such as the New Jerusalem, which will not come into existence until in the next age, after God provides a New Heaven and Earth, in Rev.21:1-3. It does not take place in the present age. Another factor that refutes your views, is in the second coming of Jesus from His marriage to the Bride/Church in Heaven, it will be WITH His Church He caught up to be with Him forever, seven years before, recorded in Rev.19:7-8, 14; Jn.14:2-3, 28; 1 Thess.4:16-17 and 2 Thess.2:3 and 7-8.
Quasar92
"You are attempting to force the text to fit the system of interpretation that John Nelson Darby brought to America about the time of the Civil War. Since that time it has spread like a virus through much of the evangelical Church. Many now promoting the doctrine have no idea where it came from.
The New Covenant was promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34.
It is found fulfilled in Hebrews 8:6-13. It is specifically applied to the Church in Hebrews 12:18-24, and 2 Corinthians 3:6-8.
The Church and Israel cannot be separated within Hebrews 8:6-13.
We find in Hebrews 13:20 that the New Covenant is "everlasting". God will not go back and deal with the modern nation of Israel under the now "obsolete" Old Covenant system with Moses as the mediator, instead of Christ.
Therefore, John Darby's Two Peoples of God doctrine cannot be correct and must be rejected.
There is no pretrib removal of the Church so that God can go back and deal with the modern nation of Israel during a future time of 7 years.
In Hebrews 13:20 the New Covenant is "everlasting".
Therefore, the "Church Age" does not end before the Second Coming of Christ, as pretrib proponents claim."
.
You are the one who is forcing the Scriptures to say things it most certainly is not. It is full of eisegesis and faulty hermeneutics. There is nothing faulty with the covenants, but your understanding of them most certainly is. The everlasting New Covenant of Grace was first predicted/prophecied to Israel, in Jer.31:31-34. It was fulfilled/delivered by Jesus in Lk.20:22, to His disciples, made manifest at His death, in Lk.23:46. Beginning at the founding of His Church at Pentecost, in Acts 2:1-3.
From that point on, both Jews and Gentiles alike, who have believed/received Jess as their Lord and Savior, have also been baptised into the Church Jesus founded, by the Holy Spirit, in 1 Cor.12:12-13. While Israel rejected Jesus as their Messiahand have not yet participated in the New Covenant of Grace. Nor will they participate in it until the second coming of Christ, at the end of the seven years of tribulation, in Zech.12:10 and Zech.14:4-5. Those are the Scriptura facts and whyIsrael and the Church are two separate entities at this time.
As I have told you previously, Margaret MacDonald and Joh Darby DID NOT invent he pre-trib rapture of the Church. But rather, they RESTORED the teachings of it from being swept under the carpet by the RCC for more than 1,600 years, due to their teachings of Amillennialism that rejects both the 1,000 year reign of Jesus on earth as well as the pre-trib rapture of the Church. Go to the following link, consisting of four consecutive posts that reveal the BIBLICAL TEACHING OF THE PRE-TRIB RAPTURE OF THE CHURCH, at my website below:
http://deeperwalk.lefora.com/topic/...he-pretrib-rapture-of-the-Church#.WOEMhaL_oa4
After you have read it all, either prove there is a single Scriptural fact you find to be false, with Scriptural support for it, or they are the true facts, as taught by Jesus, Matthew, Luke, John and Paul, and your views are false. One of the problems you have, is your mixing of the prophetic timing, such as the New Jerusalem, which will not come into existence until in the next age, after God provides a New Heaven and Earth, in Rev.21:1-3. It does not take place in the present age. Another factor that refutes your views, is in the second coming of Jesus from His marriage to the Bride/Church in Heaven, it will be WITH His Church He caught up to be with Him forever, seven years before, recorded in Rev.19:7-8, 14; Jn.14:2-3, 28; 1 Thess.4:16-17 and 2 Thess.2:3 and 7-8.
Quasar92
Upvote
0