didn’t watch the video (yet) so they might address this, but there is a difference between Rome who fully broke from the Church, and Alexandria who didn’t.
There's a lot of factors for judgment on the topic.
-- For example, northern Italy is clearly Rome's territory per the Ecumenical Councils, whereas subsaharan Africa doesn't belong to Alexandria in the terms of the Ecumenical Councils.
-- Rome and Eastern Catholic appendages claim Rome has the right to interfere anywhere and this caused the Great Schism. The CP claims that it has jurisdiction to interfere anywhere and then recognized schismatics in Ukraine as "the" Church for Ukraine and sent the UOC-MP a letter saying that they are no longer a canonical Church.
-- Then Alexandria's Patriarch backed up the CP decision, saying, "I believe that after my intervention, other Churches will
follow our Ecumenical Patriarchate." Is the CP The Patriarch of the EO Church whom EOs "follow"? He said, “a Church that wants autocephaly should receive it, and everyone else will see that it is no different from them.” (Source:
Patriarch of Alexandria: Decision to commemorate OCU will lead to solution, not a schism) Would Alexandria's Patriarch agree with that in his own case and support the own desires of his African parishes to leave if they wanted to be autocephalous? Since he opposes them leaving to join the MP Exarchate, it seems that the answer would be No.
-- The African clergy want to leave the Alexandrian Patriarchate because they don't want to be part of the Alexandrian Patriarch's decision to be in communion with the OCU. How can we say to them, "No, you must go along with the decision", when most EO Churches consider the OCU to still be schismatic?
-- The MP has been doing Mission Work in Africa for a long time now but the Alexandrian Patriarch decision throws a wrench into it in practical terms. The MP has the options to: (A) keep working under the Alexandrian Patriarch with whom it suspended communion, (B) pack up and leave Africa, (C) accept the African clergy into an Exarchate.
The ideal is for the African clergy to stay under Alexandria, with Alexandria having orderly relations with the MP and not saying to "follow" "our" Ecumenical Patriarchate in recognizing schismatics as the one only EO Church for Ukraine. But we are not in an ideal situation. The ideal situation was before 2018. Personally I don't have a solution, but can see grounds and reasons for either way that the MP would choose to act in this tough tragic situation of conflict in the EO Church. OCA recognizes the Alexandrian Patriarchate, CP, and MP, wants them to get along, and has called for a pan-Orthodox synod on MP-CP relations. Strictly speaking, I don't have a more solid answer.