to be arrested is to be arrested. one is always arrested before any proceedings with the judicial branch begin.Limbaugh wasn't "arrested" in the sense that most people think of arrest.
it does appear that 2 of the 3 conditions for 'arrest' necessarily followed in this instance. i would say that he was definately arrested in sense that most people think of it.1. To stop; check: a brake that automatically arrests motion; arrested the growth of the tumor.
2. To seize and hold under the authority of law.
3. To capture and hold briefly (the attention, for example); engage.
to be arrested is to be arrested. one is always arrested before any proceedings with the judicial branch begin.
it seems that some people will go to any lengths, inlcuding dishonesty, to cover for those who have blatanly violated their own ethical standards.
there was absolutely no bias. just a simple reporting of the facts. though i'm sure someone will come up with some euphamism for his arrest.
given his track record of speaking against those addicted as the lowest common denominator, i find it appalling that his ditto-heads, who have mindlessly regurditated his every word, are going to let him off so easily.
george78 said:Here is a PERFECT EXAMPLE of Bias being demonstrated.
http://www.wesh.com/news/8594957/detail.html
Notice how when it's a Democrat, it's "Turn's himself in" rather than "Arrested".
SAME STATE, (FL) Similar circumstances, Different Parties, Different Headlines.
There is no dishonesty. Accusing one of such without it existing is dishonest.
Their absolutely was bias. That went way beyond "a simple reporting of facts" I showed how a true NPOV headline would read.
your providing one example of a difference in wording is by no means evidence of bias.
the simple fact is, rush limbaugh was arrested on drug charges. plain and simple.
That is all very interesting about bias and all, but it doesn't have jack to do with the thread.
He was charged with a crime,
turned himself in,
bail was placed for a release, and conditions were placed upon that release.
One can quibble about whether he was arrested, but it shares the same process of someone who was indeed arrested.
I hope he thinks twice before lambasting those "other people" who are drug addicts just like him.InnerPhyre said:I hope he stays clean
Doctrine1st said:I hope he thinks twice before lambasting those "other people" who are drug addicts just like him.
he has not felt the need to ever make the distinction.but there is less of a moral failing there than someone who begins taking drugs for recreational purposes.
george78 said:More Bias from the AP
------------------.
ar·rest ([FONT=verdana,sans-serif] P [/FONT]) Pronunciation Key (-rst)
v. ar·rest·ed, ar·rest·ing, ar·rests
v. tr.
-----------------
- To stop; check: a brake that automatically arrests motion; arrested the growth of the tumor.
- To seize and hold under the authority of law.
- To capture and hold briefly (the attention, for example); engage.
A NPOV Headline/Article would have read: "Limbaugh reaches Settlement with DA" or "Limbaugh turns himself in, after accepting Settlement."
Limbaugh wasn't "arrested" in the sense that most people think of arrest. (Hunted down and put in cuffs) he turned himself in on a pre-arraigned settlement. The AP just hates him so bad, the wrote the story to smear him as best they could.