Roger Stone arrested

[disciple Clint]

Okay, post me a Linkie-poo

It was in the post: DOJ Opens Investigation Into FISA Abuse, FBI Contacts With ‘Confidential Source’

 

[Pommer]

It was in the post: DOJ Opens Investigation Into FISA Abuse, FBI Contacts With ‘Confidential Source’

Huh.
And my link said that Horowitz delivered the report in June 2018...is there a NEW DOJ investigation that you’re talking about?
The long-awaited inspector general report on the FBI, Comey, Clinton, and 2016, explained

 

[disciple Clint]

Huh.
And my link said that Horowitz delivered the report in June 2018...is there a NEW DOJ investigation that you’re talking about?
The long-awaited inspector general report on the FBI, Comey, Clinton, and 2016, explained

YES that would be the one that I have provided a link to twice now and it is not the Comey, Clinton investigation.

 

[DaisyDay]

I have no idea why it is on me that you do not watch the news shows on tv, seems that that is personal decision that you made and I had nothing to do with.

I'm sorry, but I can't tell if that's your idea of humor or if you're genuinely having trouble following the conversation...On the off chance that it's the latter, it's on you that you believe the tv news you watch.

Regarding the evidence seized, that is news to me but I have to ask, how many agents would it take to search a house? Do you think that it would require 27+?

Evidently.

They may find things that they did not ask for but that would not be Stone's fault since he provided what they requested. He has had plenty of time to dispose of anything that would incriminate him if that is what he wanted to do.

And they may find things they did ask for that he didn't dispose of. We just don't know.

I provided that information in answer to another post. Here it is again.
READ: Jerome Corsi’s complaint against Special Counsel Robert Mueller

Can you please give synopsis, and Jerome "Swiftboat Birther" Corsi?

 

[Pommer]

YES that would be the one that I have provided a link to twice now and it is not the Comey, Clinton investigation.

Oh okay, sorry .

 

[DaisyDay]

Repeating the joke doesn't make it funnier.

Seriously, have you even looked at this guy?

You think he's a showboating publicity hound, check out his lawyer on the suit, Larry Klayman. He not only file 18 separate suits against the Clintons, he also filed a birther suit against Obama as well as a petition to the Dept. of Homeland Security to deport the president in 2014

The court noted, "Klayman accused this Court of being ‘coopted by the so called ‘Deep State’’ into ruling against him. Unfortunately for plaintiffs, such baseless accusations are no substitute for a well-pleaded complaint."

 

[disciple Clint]

I'm sorry, but I can't tell if that's your idea of humor or if you're genuinely having trouble following the conversation...On the off chance that it's the latter, it's on you that you believe the tv news you watch.
Evidently.

And they may find things they did ask for that he didn't dispose of. We just don't know.
Can you please give synopsis, and Jerome "Swiftboat Birther" Corsi?

It was my error I thought you were talking about the statement you made earlier indicating that you did not watch tv news. I watch most of the major networks including CNN MSNBC and FOX

 

[TLK Valentine]

You think he's a showboating publicity hound, check out his lawyer on the suit, Larry Klayman. He not only file 18 separate suits against the Clintons, he also filed a birther suit against Obama as well as a petition to the Dept. of Homeland Security to deport the president in 2014

And remember, boys and girls -- this is the face of Mueller's opposition.

 

[TLK Valentine]

Just because you do not agree with the man's political positions does not mean that his charges against Mueller have no basis in fact.

It's not his "political" position -- it's his consistent refusal of reality that's troublesome... to those who don't share it.

Jut for the record, what what country do you think Obama was born in?

 

[KCfromNC]

Charged is a long way from convicted.

And even further from your claim that there's "nothing illegal about what Stone did other than the fact that they believe that he lied". They "believe" he did a lot more, given the charges against him.

 

[KCfromNC]

The inspector generals investigation will provide plenty of proof of who has been telling lies.

Nah, all I have do to is scroll back and see what you wrote and compare it against actual legal documents to see which is the truth.

 

[KCfromNC]

This “news” is ten months old.

That, plus complaining that too many people were there when he was arrested seem to be the best defense they can muster for this guy. Kinda makes you wonder why they're so sure he's innocent. Especially since they're also asserting that there's no connection to Trump. Feels to me like if they really believed that then who cares what some random employee did. Maybe the need to vigorously defend someone like that indicates how worried they are about their guy? I don't know, doesn't seem to make much sense.

 

[KCfromNC]

Then it shouldn't be too hard for you to find them so we can all see.

Already done. Any time people want to start talking about the details from, say, the link in post #2, feel free. For some reason, though, it seems that I'm responding to posts which talk about everything but them. Kinda makes it feel like those facts are intentionally being ignored.

 

[KCfromNC]

I am pointing out that any crimes that they may have committed have nothing to do with proving that Trump is guilty of any crime.

Has anyone said he did? Weird you'd jump right to defending a guy not accused of anything - unless you too agree that the various indictments and convictions of his campaign staff and administration is certainly very suspicious.

 

[KCfromNC]

Not the same investigation and yes I am quite certain.

Yeah, but you also wrote that the Stone indictment didn't mention anything other than lying to investigators, and we all know how that turned out.

 

[camille70]

That, plus complaining that too many people were there when he was arrested seem to be the best defense they can muster for this guy. Kinda makes you wonder why they're so sure he's innocent. Especially since they're also asserting that there's no connection to Trump. Feels to me like if they really believed that then who cares what some random employee did. Maybe the need to vigorously defend someone like that indicates how worried they are about their guy? I don't know, doesn't seem to make much sense.

I wonder how much pushback they'd get if NFL players took a knee to protest the arrest of Roger Stone.

 

[Gigimo]

Donald's hand-picked cronies, one and all. Why do you want other people punished for his bad decisions?



Silly you, indeed -- remember what we said about GOP law enforcement? (hint: after ten years and no dirt on Hillary, think "incompetent.")

But I'll humor you -- what, aside from associating with known Clintons, would you have Podesta charged with?

For some reason certain people want to forget that the actions they were indicted for happened way before they worked for Trump. The last administration knew about them and chose to do nothing, so why is that?

Is it because it blows up the "popular rhetoric" some people are wanting to push?

(Pssst: The Podestas did some of the same thing/s as Manafort and the others and are being ignored. Could that be because they are associates of the Clintons? Shhhhhh)...

 

[cow451]

For some reason certain people want to forget that the actions they were indicted for happened way before they worked for Trump. The last administration knew about them and chose to do nothing, so why is that?

Is it because it blows up the "popular rhetoric" some people are wanting to push?

(Pssst: The Podestas did some of the same thing/s as Manafort and the others and are being ignored. Could that be because they are associates of the Clintons? Shhhhhh)...

If they were ignored you need to complain to your President, his appointees and the Republicans that controlled Congress for two years.

 

[Gigimo]

If they were ignored you need to complain to your President, his appointees and the Republicans that controlled Congress for two years.

Why, what they did was under Obama's watch, just like those that were indicted.

Besides this is what Mueller is supposed to be doing, right? Looking for any crime (not a specific one) or making up a crime that might have to do with Russia?

 

[cow451]

Why, what they did was under Obama's watch, just like those that were indicted.

Besides this is what Mueller is supposed to be doing, right? Looking for any crime (not a specific one) or making up a crime that might have to do with Russia?

So why not address those that would have the power to do something instead of whining about the media and Democrats????

Rosenstein letter appointing Mueller special counsel