- Jun 5, 2020
- 1,412
- 653
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Originally when we began posting our studies on Revelation here it was to answer the questions “Is Christ coming in our time” and “was this past history.”
When we began posting we both felt it was not sufficient enough to show Revelation is making sense to us (and other Jews and Ephraimites), so we decided to publish the entire first chapter which is now on this site.
We hope our perspective that we presented makes sense and answers it’s not past history but rather points to Christ’s second coming.
To recap some points to keep in mind, the original language is important, such as the Seven Visible Sephroth and the Four Living Creatures. Much can be found online; however, we strongly suggest to search Strong’s interpretations because it gives even less common potential (though) valid interpretations, such as those for “read” and “hear”, which makes more sense in context if interpreted, “read with understanding” and “to report what is heard” rather than their more common interpretation.
Also, some texts may point to the “future” but also echoes the past. For example, the letters that are written to the churches the Lord is trying to reach us with truth, but there’s an echo of the church’s past. One even echoes back to a story in Acts that forms a parable, Thyati’ra, Rev.18 cf Acts 16, where Paul met a prophetess.
Only when the letters are more clearly and correctly interpreted do the connections of the Seven Sephroth to the churches are made.
Another problem we find is that the Nicha’itians are often linked to Nichola’us, a proselyte of Anitioch (according to the footnotes of many Bibles). Yet he was a righteous deacon according to Acts, and there was no supporting information to make that common link.
Furthermore, those footnotes often link Nichola’us, Acts.6.5 to the sin of, Rev.2.14, and 20. Yet the church of Per’gamum also has that same sin mentioned in the very next verse! Therefore they cannot be the same sin!
We could not find the Nichaitians in history, but the meaning of that name is “Victory over the people” and the sin of the assembly of E’phrasus is judging people wrongly.
Another name that requires interpreting is An’tipas, which seems best defined as “substitute Father.” This could reference the pope or another possible meaning is the Authority of the the Church, infallibility, Jn.16.12-15. Also, the ten days of tribulation, Rev.2.10, harken to the Days of Awe a Hebrew Holday that comes in the fall.
We already gave an example of how to interpret the first four seals. As said, if one of the Four Living Creatures says “Come!” there must be words linking that Creature to that interpretation, as we linked Christ’s words to the Zier Apin/ Christ calling “Come!” and the going forth of the Gospel.
The only other clue that may help for the seals: Rev.6.12-14, is look to Jl.2.10, 30, and Jude 13, to understand the opening of the sixth seal, its symbolic language of judgment on one of the houses of Israel.
For winds of Rev.7, see Ez.37.9 and the seal, see Ez.9.4, for an explanation. As the tribes, Brit-Am can help locate them. With these clues one should be able to read much of Revelation leading up to chapter 10.
We are not certain how to handle chapter 10. Should we publish the entire chapter or only the part that’s written in Kabbalah, 10.1 or tied to a difficult interpretation, 4, (ex: grapho means not only “write” but “to describe”). Clearly, John physically wrote Revelation down, so what can “do not write it down”/”do not describe it” mean?
We can come up with an answer; however, it’s seems complex and likely will be as controversial as Rev.1.3. Therefore, we have decided to consider doing so at a later time. Also, we are also curious to know what others see in Chapters 1-9 before we publish any more of this book.
When we began posting we both felt it was not sufficient enough to show Revelation is making sense to us (and other Jews and Ephraimites), so we decided to publish the entire first chapter which is now on this site.
We hope our perspective that we presented makes sense and answers it’s not past history but rather points to Christ’s second coming.
To recap some points to keep in mind, the original language is important, such as the Seven Visible Sephroth and the Four Living Creatures. Much can be found online; however, we strongly suggest to search Strong’s interpretations because it gives even less common potential (though) valid interpretations, such as those for “read” and “hear”, which makes more sense in context if interpreted, “read with understanding” and “to report what is heard” rather than their more common interpretation.
Also, some texts may point to the “future” but also echoes the past. For example, the letters that are written to the churches the Lord is trying to reach us with truth, but there’s an echo of the church’s past. One even echoes back to a story in Acts that forms a parable, Thyati’ra, Rev.18 cf Acts 16, where Paul met a prophetess.
Only when the letters are more clearly and correctly interpreted do the connections of the Seven Sephroth to the churches are made.
Another problem we find is that the Nicha’itians are often linked to Nichola’us, a proselyte of Anitioch (according to the footnotes of many Bibles). Yet he was a righteous deacon according to Acts, and there was no supporting information to make that common link.
Furthermore, those footnotes often link Nichola’us, Acts.6.5 to the sin of, Rev.2.14, and 20. Yet the church of Per’gamum also has that same sin mentioned in the very next verse! Therefore they cannot be the same sin!
We could not find the Nichaitians in history, but the meaning of that name is “Victory over the people” and the sin of the assembly of E’phrasus is judging people wrongly.
Another name that requires interpreting is An’tipas, which seems best defined as “substitute Father.” This could reference the pope or another possible meaning is the Authority of the the Church, infallibility, Jn.16.12-15. Also, the ten days of tribulation, Rev.2.10, harken to the Days of Awe a Hebrew Holday that comes in the fall.
We already gave an example of how to interpret the first four seals. As said, if one of the Four Living Creatures says “Come!” there must be words linking that Creature to that interpretation, as we linked Christ’s words to the Zier Apin/ Christ calling “Come!” and the going forth of the Gospel.
The only other clue that may help for the seals: Rev.6.12-14, is look to Jl.2.10, 30, and Jude 13, to understand the opening of the sixth seal, its symbolic language of judgment on one of the houses of Israel.
For winds of Rev.7, see Ez.37.9 and the seal, see Ez.9.4, for an explanation. As the tribes, Brit-Am can help locate them. With these clues one should be able to read much of Revelation leading up to chapter 10.
We are not certain how to handle chapter 10. Should we publish the entire chapter or only the part that’s written in Kabbalah, 10.1 or tied to a difficult interpretation, 4, (ex: grapho means not only “write” but “to describe”). Clearly, John physically wrote Revelation down, so what can “do not write it down”/”do not describe it” mean?
We can come up with an answer; however, it’s seems complex and likely will be as controversial as Rev.1.3. Therefore, we have decided to consider doing so at a later time. Also, we are also curious to know what others see in Chapters 1-9 before we publish any more of this book.
