If you're trying to point out the hypocrisy in Christians sinning and not feeling guilty which would mean to neglect the sacrifice of Christ, I am not sure I understand.
There is a lot of hypocrisy in the Christian community, but I wasn't intentionally trying to point that out.
Like I said in my earlier post, most Christians feel bad when they do something wrong, but what I was getting at is that it's not the type of conviction of sin that would drive people away from sinning. It's like seeing a dead animal in the road: "Wow, that's horrible. Too bad. Oh, look, a Wendy's. PULL OVER!!!" You feel bad for a split moment, but then you sin the same sin yet again - in many instances, the very next day.
It goes back to the whole genuinely repenting thing. We repent because we really feel as if we violated God's love, not because of our own personal gain.
Yea', exactly.
And I'm not sure if you're making a random statement or if that was directed towards something I wrote, but for the record, I never implied it was for our own gain.
As with your analogy to which I tweaked, the father would not begin to apologize to his son for his own advantage but if he really is human and feels sorry he would do so because he honestly felt bad.
Yea', that's exactly what I've been saying. Where are you getting this "own advantage" stuff from?
The point still stands that if you hurt someone you love, you feel bad. The reason I chose to use the son as an example, instead of father, was because it's totally synonymous with us and God. We are the children of God. And we (the children/"the son") sin against the Father, and as a result caused His son (God) to be tortured and killed because of us, to -save- us. Same as my earlier example, the child caused indirect harm to his father, not the father (or Father) caused harm to h(H)is children.
A Christian does not habitually sin because of Christ's sacrifice
Who said they did?
when we do sin I would say most Christians realize they're wrong and begin to feel shame.
But yet there we go, right back into those muddy waters the very next day.
The -level- of shame is but a mere speck on the surface of what I believe genuine repentance is about.
You used the word "hate" in one of your earlier posts - such a strong, strong word. Does anyone "HATE" sin? Man, NO WAY! NO. WAY. We (I'll use the word "we", as I'm a somewhat luke-cold Christian) feel bad, but that really about sums it up.
Lying, for example. There was a Saint named Teresa (St. Teresa of Avila), and she said that she would rather die a 1,000 deaths than to lie even once. Yet it's almost as if you have to pull out a magnifying glass to catch the brief glimpse of a truth certain Christians speak.
I mean it just boggles my mind that God could have chosen 50 billion things to have us NOT do, and yet he simply chose TEN. One of which? Don't lie. I mean if the creator of all there was, is and all there will be - the creator of both you and me, and all we see, says DON'T LIE, there has to be an INCREDIBLY deep meaning and reason behind saying such a thing. Why then, do we not get that DEEP DOWN? The way Teresa seemed to "get it?" It seems as if everyone lies. People only need do (or not do) TEN THINGS, and hating/not loving and lying is what we do best. Yet every Tom, Dick and Harry considers themselves a Christian.
You said in one of your earlier posts that repentance would be, "hate toward our sin." Think about the word hate for a second. If someone HATED their job with a very, very deeply rooted passion, would they continue working if they didn't absolutely HAVE to? If every single day, seven days a week, they walked into a factory and their "greet and smile" was a stench so disturbing it would nauseate anyone upon contact, and once inside, they walk into an atmosphere that's so loud they have no choice but to wear ear plugs. They then begin their excruciatingly labor-intensive tasks, all the while being harassed by coworkers 6 of the 12 hour shift they work. They then take their 10 minute break, and back into that shower of soul shattering they go. Punch out, and repeat the next day. Tell me: if they (them, their family, and their children) didn't highly, highly depend on that job, would they continue working there? To answer the question, no. They wouldn't. No one in their right mind would. So why then do most Christians continue to sin if it truly is "hate" they have for sin? I think if we hated sin, we would stop sinning. I mean, really. Does such a statement need to be analyzed?
What I think, though, is that an even HIGHER (non-worldly, but rather GODLY) level of hate towards sin is what MANY (including myself) need in order to truly have a great chance of turning away. It seems pretty obvious to me that feeling "bad" is just not enough. I don't really know if the shame many of us feel is even genuine - I mean how in the world could it be? It may just be what I believe is an (I'll use your word) "act." I don't think it's a sorrow that stems from guidance of the Holy Spirit, but rather what I believe is from a world view that says, "GOD SAID THIS IS BAD. SO DON'T DO IT." And thus people feel bad doing "it" because they've been led to believe that "it" is bad, and not because they have a genuine remorse in their heart of hearts that such a thing is just down right detestable.
Abraham knew the law in his heart before it even existed. That's what I'm starting to think many of us need. We need whatever caused him to KNOW God's law from a place of Spirit, and not a place of intellectuality (which is where I believe many, including myself, are operating from), so that we can repent in the absolute truest form, as God had originally intended.
Upvote
0