I'm asking you to support your claim.(surprising answer even to me) Perhaps YOU can tell me who tests everything before accepting it ?
Upvote
0
I'm asking you to support your claim.(surprising answer even to me) Perhaps YOU can tell me who tests everything before accepting it ?
I'm still waiting for you to support your claim - that should give you a clue.It is a requirement to test everything.
OR
DO YOU BELIEVE every post, or any post, BEFORE you know if it is true or not ?
If you're running away shouldn't you stop posting?I do not accept any post from anyone unless I first test it/ verify it/ prove that it is true, or until I know (verified) that it is true with no contradiction to Scripture, and no contradiction to Yahuweh's Spirit, Plan or Purpose in Christ Jesus. IF it is from any other voice besides Jesus the Shepherd, we (sheep) do not listen to it, but run from it as it is opposed to Jesus.
So if someone posits something you can’t imagine you think they are being dishonest?
Oh, it was controversial in the early to mid-19th century, but the mutability of species and common ancestry became entirely non-controversial within the sciences about 150 years ago. The discovery of DNA and genetics only helped confirm and expand our understanding of evolution.
Here's your postI'm not clear on what you are asking, can you please rephrase it?
hgb
I never thought they were different.
Sure it's controversial, it's as controversial as evolution itself that a higher form of life like man came for a single celled animal in that way, yet you have the nerve to say it's not the slightest bit controversial??
It's reasons like that, among others, I can't trust some of you enough to carry on a debate? See, there has to be at least something that resembles honesty here in order for one party to take the other seriousely.
You are not just accusing Pitabread of being wrong, but being dishonest about it. Essentially, you are accusing her of lying because you disagree with her statement.
It's not the slightest bit controversial except in certain conservative religious circles, and even there not for scientific reasons.
Pitabread's statement is honest and correct.
Do you not see those who argue against evolution right here on these boards daily. Controversy is alive an well in spite of the sheer denial here
Not in the slightest. It's the same process, just over a much longer period of time (from first life to now). The only people who find it controversial are those who feel it contradicts their religious views.
As I said, the only people who find the process of evolution and the idea of the evolution of life from single-celled organisms controversial are those with religious objections to it.
But there is no controversy. Scientists think evolution is uncontroversial. Creationists all think it's wrong, so there's no controversy there, either.