Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The bible was tested. You have never tested squat in the far past or future or spiritual, or distant universe.
My claim is that science assumes and believes certain things and the thread illustrates that. Get with the plan.
If science has Jesus in it. you should be able to show us where! You can't. It is devoid of Christ and truth! Of course it is limited. Ask any scientist. They all know that they do not know it all.You are begging the question here. You are assuming that since science is "godless" then it's by nature limited... but quite the opposite seems to be true.
You have a means of empty blab and boasting. No connection to reality.Since we developed better scientific framework, we have a lot more reliable means of navigating reality.
Name any aspect of medicine that depends on same state past belief? Otherwise what we have here is a dishonest attempt to claim glory for the religion of science.For example, all of your religious testing couldn't save millions of children who died prematurely simply because people didn't understand basics of medicine.
History was tested. Nothing better exists in the little realm of demon scienceSo, you have claims that it was tested then and "fulfilled"? Do you have anything better we can use and test now?
Try to post coherently.I agree completely, you are absolutely right.
This thread DOES illustrate that you have claimed that science assumes and believes certain things.
Unfortunately, nothing you have posted in this thread or any other thread has shown that your claims and criticisms of science are valid in any way whatsoever.
The verification of history and the record of God's people is far beyond the realm of little science. It is wishful thinking to think otherwise.Fine. If we have such verification, then put it up. All you have is wishful thinking.
Great. So who claims numbers? Focus.There are "no numbers to prove" that you're a real human being on the other side of this Internet connection, and not just a very advanced learning robot undergoing a long training session to pass the Turing test.
Well done.Based off of experience and common sense, though, I'm able to figure out that you're almost definitely a person.
Try not to say anything until you know. Give us all a break.Same thing for figuring out what happened in the past. Technically, it's possible that the laws of physics as they are now literally just kicked in a few seconds ago, or that absolutely nothing existed before then.
Newsflash: we do not live in the world of the former nature and Noah! Not now. We live in the present world.We can't live in that world, though, and if we tried, it wouldn't be too healthy.
It's perfectly reasonable for a person to ask for proof if you're going to assert that the Universe used to be the same!It's perfectly reasonable for a person to ask for proof if you're going to assert that the Universe used to be radically different (to the point where a fully formed DNA molecule could easily just pop out of the void).
The so called science religion never sleeps.The irony!
The verification of history and the record of God's people is far beyond the realm of little science. It is wishful thinking to think otherwise.
Not a good attitude."I don't need no stinking verification!"
They need to read them first. Maybe if they did they could support your wild claims of a certain state in the past. You sure can't.I do. Notice that no one else complains that my posts lack coherence.
They need to read them first. Maybe if they did they could support your wild claims of a certain state in the past. You sure can't.
Misrepresentation is not cool.Notice the quote marks? I was summing up your point of view, not issuing a viewpoint of my own.
No. But I suggest that more people would read them and get something out of them if they were pregnant with content.Wow. So you think that you are the only person on here to read my posts? My goodness.
Only by faith, and that doesn't count on a science forum.And my claims of a same state past have been supported, by both myself and others.
You are incapable of producing any at all for your pagan dream state past.The fact that you are 1) incapable of understanding the evidence,
Misuse of the word reality does not help your empty posts.and 2) blinded by your beliefs does not change the fact that I have reality on my side and you do not.
No science or rationality supports that anti God anti creation anti Creator, anti Christ dream state you preach.(Now you are, no doubt, going to tell me that I'm not allowed to use the word reality, or that reality is your thing, or something like that, as you have done before - it seems that the only response to my arguments is to try to belittle science and rationality.)
Science is about the same thing on creation issues. No news there.But the HI Theory is all about misrepresentation. The first law is "It's easy to make things up." I envy a dad who can embrace his uncoolness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?