How do you link her forgiveness of her attacker and the changed life of the attacker to a miracle? People can forgive others for grievous things and people can have life transformation without a God.
From a Christian POV, God is the Source of all good in all things that are not-God. Including all the good experienced, said, thought, done, found, enjoyed by or known to atheists. God (in that POV) does not need permission to be the Good God that (so Christians believe) God is. So on the Christian “hypothesis”, the good things you mention are good gifts of the unrecognised God to and through people who may very well be sure that God does not exist. That they are not recognised as gifts of God, does not make them any less good or any less life-enhancing. From a Christian POV, such things, however non-miraculous & ordinary they may be, are as genuinely works of God as any miracle has been said to be.
And the fact that people do not recognise the Goodness of God in the good things they receive from others, in no ways means that nobody recognises the Goodness of God in these things. An old woman may be seen by some people as an ugly old hag of no importance - but by one man, she is seen as his wife whom he has known and loved for many years; whon he, therefore, because he knows and loves her, sees as beautiful. One woman, two sets of people to see her, two ways in which to see her. One of the properties of love is, that it opens the eyes and hearts of those who love, so that what may be of no importance in the eyes of others, is seen as beautiful and valuable in the eyes of those who love it.
Recognising the action of God is a bit like that. Those who love God best, have more of a capacity to recognise Him than the rest of us do. From a purely rationalistic POV, the love of an old man for his old wife may seem incongruous, morbid, or inexplicable - but no rational calculation or scientific analysis can reduce the experienced reality of the love between the two.
They know they love one another, even if their love cannot be “transposed”, from their experience, into a convincing rational proof of that love’s reality.
And in a similar way, the reality of the Love of God can be known by being experienced, even if the reality of it cannot be “decanted” into a proof of its reality that would persuade a sceptic. The Love of God that invites creatures to love God can be talked about endlessly - but that is a “third person” activity; the serious business of being Loved by God, and of responding to that Love with love, is a “second person” activity: a dialogue between God the Creator and the created thing. This “second person” activity cannot be transposed into a “third person” activity, so it cannot be turned from an encounter
with God into an argument
about God.