http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/05/ndna105.xml
I will start by congratulating this judge for recognising the blindingly obviously ridiculous situation that people who are innocent of any crime are having their DNA stored on a database...
sadly the judge from the Ministry of Truth then goes on to argue that EVERYONE should have their DNA taken and stored on a database...
will stop here, or will end up ranting...
some background:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/87948.stm (1998)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3088920.stm (2003)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/24/ndna24.xml (2006)
I will start by congratulating this judge for recognising the blindingly obviously ridiculous situation that people who are innocent of any crime are having their DNA stored on a database...
sadly the judge from the Ministry of Truth then goes on to argue that EVERYONE should have their DNA taken and stored on a database...
will stop here, or will end up ranting...
some background:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/87948.stm (1998)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3088920.stm (2003)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/10/24/ndna24.xml (2006)