Don't think so. That episode is followed in chapter 11 by Herod the Great and Octavian conquering the remainder of the Greek Empire. Then chapter 12 which prophecies the destruction of Jerusalem and the abomination that sets up up desolation. In other words there are two abominations.
it is interesting how some of these prophecy can be parallel and perhaps a dual fulfillment. It would be odd for the 70 7's to be speaking of both weeks being 7 year period and then have the middle of a 7 year week be now interpreted as 1290 days now being 1290 years. The 1st half form the order to rebuild Jerusalem and its wall was exact to the time Jesus road in on the foal of the donkey exactly 483 years from the order. The thing that is interesting is that the scope of this is either future and talking about the same thing John saw in Revelation or not. It seems the scope is given in Dan 9The desolation was after Herod and the coming of the Lord Jesus. Dan 12 1. Most people fall down by being taught that its says that the great tribulation in the gospels say there will we a tribulation worse that any other, But it does not say that, it says such as.
Daniel 12 goes on to speak of the sacrifice being taken away
Josephus gives the date of those two events and the time between the two was 1290 days. There were a further 45 days till the destruction of the temple. 1335 in all. It all fits in before Revelation.
- 11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
Are we talking about the same thing here?The desolation was after Herod and the coming of the Lord Jesus. Dan 12 1. Most people fall down by being taught that its says that the great tribulation in the gospels say there will we a tribulation worse that any other, But it does not say that, it says such as.
Daniel 12 goes on to speak of the sacrifice being taken away
Josephus gives the date of those two events and the time between the two was 1290 days. There were a further 45 days till the destruction of the temple. 1335 in all. It all fits in before Revelation.
- 11 And from the time that the daily sacrifice shall be taken away, and the abomination that maketh desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days.
Bit of a misquote there:Jesus Christ told the people then that they would not see His day.
as in--the day of His coming
Don't think so. That episode is followed in chapter 11 by Herod the Great and Octavian conquering the remainder of the Greek Empire. Then chapter 12 which prophecies the destruction of Jerusalem and the abomination that sets up up desolation. In other words there are two abominations.
Are we talking about the same thing here?
Antiochus IV Epiphanes in Daniel 8:
8. Therefore the male goat (Alexander the Great) became very great: and when he was strong, the great horn was broken; and in it's place came up four notable ones toward the four winds of heaven. 9. And out of one of them ( out of the division of Alexanders empire between his generals.) came forth a little horn, which grew exceedingly great, toward the south, and toward the east, and toward the pleasant land. 10. And it grew great, even to the army of heaven; and it cast down some of the army and of the stars to the ground, and stamped upon them. 11. Yes, he magnified himself even to the ruler of the army, and by him the daily sacrifice was taken away, and the place of his sanctuary was cast down. 12. And an army was given him against the daily sacrifice by reason of transgression, and it cast down the truth to the ground; and it practiced, and prospered. 13. Then I heard one holy one speaking, and another holy said to that certain holy one which spoke, How long shall be the vision concerning the daily sacrifice, and the transgression of desolation, to give both the sanctuary and the army to be trodden under foot? 14. And he said to me, Until two thousand and three hundred days; then shall the sanctuary be cleansed.......21. And the rough goat is the king of Greece: and the great horn that is between his eyes is the first king.(Alexander) 22. Now that being broken, whereas four stood in its place, four kingdoms shall stand up out of the nation, but not in his power. 23. AND IN THE LATTER TIME OF THEIR KINGDOM A, when the transgressors are come to the full, a king of fierce expression, skilled in intrigues, shall stand up. 24. And his power shall be mighty, but not by his own power: and he shall destroy wonderfully, and shall prosper, and accomplish, and shall destroy the mighty and the holy people. 25. And through his policy also he shall cause craft to prosper in his hand; and he shall magnify himself in his heart, and by peace shall destroy many: he shall also stand up against the Prince of princes; but he shall be broken without hand.
Antiochus IV Epiphanes Daniel 11:
21. And in his (Seleucus IV Philopater) estate shall stand up a vile person (Antiochus Epiphanes, the little horn of Daniel 8:9-12, 23-25 ) to whom they shall not give the honor of the kingdom: but he shall come in peaceably, and obtain the kingdom by flatteries.
22. And with the arms of a flood shall they be overflown from before him and shall be broken; yea, also the prince (Ptolemy Philometer the son of Ptolemy Epiphanes and Cleopatra) of the covenant. (The covenant between Antiochus III and Ptolemy Epiphanes.)
23. And after the league (between Ptolemy Philometer and Antiochus Epiphanes) made with him he (Antiochus Epiphanes) shall work deceitfully: for he shall come up, and shall become strong with a small people.
24. He (Antiochus Epiphanes) shall enter peaceably even upon the fattest places of the province; and he shall do that which his fathers have not done, nor his fathers' fathers; he shall scatter among them the prey, and spoil, and riches: yea, and he shall forecast his devices against the strong holds, even for a time. Historical account. (Verses 22-24 also fits the rise of Antiochus Epiphanes in Syria rather than his dealings with the Ptolemy Philometer and can even be construed to fit his dealings with Jerusalem.)
25. And he (Antiochus Epiphanes) shall stir up his power and his courage against the king of the south (Ptolemy Philometer) with a great army; and the king of the south shall be stirred up to battle with a very great and mighty army; but he (the king of the south) shall not stand: for they (traitors) shall forecast devices against him.
26. Yea, they (Ptolomy's servants) that feed of the portion of his meat shall destroy him, and his army shall overflow: and many shall fall down slain.
27. And both these kings' hearts shall be to do mischief, and they shall speak lies at one table; but it shall not prosper: for yet the end shall be at the time appointed. ( Even though Antiochus Epiphanes has won, yet because of his fear of how the Romans will react if he completely annexes Egypt militarily. He negotiates with his nephew Ptolemy Philometer in guise of taking Egypt deceitfully through accord.)
28. Then shall he (Antiochus Epiphanes) return into his land with great riches; and his heart shall be against the holy covenant; and he shall do exploits, and return to his own land. (Antiochus murdered 40,000 jews, sold more 40,000 (woman and children) into slavery and plundered the temple.)
29. At the time appointed he (Antiochus Epiphanes) shall return, and come toward the south; but it shall not be as the former, or as the latter.
30. For the ships of Chittim (Roman) shall come against him: therefore he shall be grieved, and return, and have indignation against the holy covenant: so shall he do; he shall even return, and have intelligence with them that forsake the holy covenant. (The Romans compelled him to forsake his campaign against Egypt, his army then returned to Jerusalem with the aid of apostate Jews.)
31. And arms shall stand on his part, and they shall pollute the sanctuary of strength, and shall take away the daily sacrifice, and they shall place the abomination that makes desolate. (His army sacked the city with orders to murder all the men and take the women and children captive. offered a pig on the alter, placed an alter to Zeus in the temple, sought to completely exterminate Juda)
Daniel 11:36-45 Herod The Great and Octavian
Daniel 12: The first century.
Daniel 12:11. And from the time that the daily sacrifice is taken away, and the abomination that makes desolate set up, there shall be a thousand two hundred and ninety days. 12. Blessed is he that waits, and cometh to the thousand three-hundred and thirty-five days.
This is a referance to the daily sacrifice for the emperor which Josephus sights as the effective date of the begining of the war. The problem with this is that our knowledge of history can only place this within a 6 month time period. Whcih I mention because you are sighting things meassured by the day which is not really possible for us to do. Its enough that we get the year right.
it is interesting how some of these prophecy can be parallel and perhaps a dual fulfillment. It would be odd for the 70 7's to be speaking of both weeks being 7 year period and then have the middle of a 7 year week be now interpreted as 1290 days now being 1290 years. The 1st half form the order to rebuild Jerusalem and its wall was exact to the time Jesus road in on the foal of the donkey exactly 483 years from the order. The thing that is interesting is that the scope of this is either future and talking about the same thing John saw in Revelation or not. It seems the scope is given in Dan 9
4 “Seventy weeks are determined
For your people and for your holy city,
To finish the transgression,
To make an end of sins,
To make reconciliation for iniquity,
To bring in everlasting righteousness,
To seal up vision and prophecy,
And to anoint the Most Holy.
The scope is very Israel and Jerusalem centered. The anointing of the Most Holy sounds like the anointing of a king. Jesus is coming as King of Kings at the end of the 7 year tribulation. I believe Daniels 70th week and John's 7 years tribulation are speaking of the same thing. Hosea said this about Israel in Ch 3 For the children of Israel shall abide many days without king or prince, without sacrifice or sacred pillar, without ephod or teraphim. 5 Afterward the children of Israel shall return and seek the LORD their God and David their king. They shall fear the LORD and His goodness in the latter days
The abomination of desolation Jesus refered to can only be this:Matthew, Mark and Luke also describe the Destruction Of Jerusalem which happened in AD 70. It is the same destruction and the same abomination spoken by Daniel.
Mark 13:14 But when ye shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet,
Daniel 11 tells us who will place the A of D, those of the ships of Chittim, the Romans. Dan 12 tells us when it will be, after Herod, and after the Messiah came.
I agree with most of this except the daily sacrifice. The daily sacrifice was the Jewish sacrifice which failed 45 days before the temple was destroyed by fire, and 1290 days after the city was surrounded by the Roman armies under Cestius. Josephus tells how Titus pleaded for the sacrifice to continue.and how the temple was set on fire against his orders.
Antochius took took the sacrifice away but is was restored exactly a year to the day later.
You mis-quoted it. Paraphrased it in such a way as to make it conflict with all the other statements Jesus made on the matter of his coming at the end of the first covenant age. By the way. You not not totally wrong about Revelation 6:12-7:8. They are in fact talking about the end of the Old Covenant age and destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. Immediately after Revelation 7:12 though the prophecy turns its attention to the Roman empire and its persecution of the saints.A person needs to correct an error =as I did not misquote - I did not even give a reference. Just made a statement.
You can't just pull what is in Daniel 11 out of its context and make that the abomination of desolation Jesus spoke of as future. The one in Daniel 11 occurs before Herod the Great and the Octavian's conquering of the remainder of the Greek empire. (If that is what you are doing. I might not be understanding what you are trying to say.)