• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  2. The forums in the Christian Congregations category are now open only to Christian members. Please review our current Faith Groups list for information on which faith groups are considered to be Christian faiths. Christian members please remember to read the Statement of Purpose threads for each forum within Christian Congregations before posting in the forum.

Professional Climbers Are Laughing at Trump’s ‘Impenetrable’ Wall Claims

Discussion in 'The Kitchen Sink' started by tulc, Sep 22, 2019.

  1. tulc

    tulc loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!

    +13,810
    Christian
    Married
    Professional Climbers Are Laughing at Trump’s ‘Impenetrable’ Wall Claims
    I was reminded of something I recently saw proving no one could climb the wall:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    well...as long as someone has a sharpie handy any way. :sorry:
    tulc(is just sayn') :cool:
     
    We teamed up with Faith Counseling. Can they help you today?
  2. Monk Brendan

    Monk Brendan Well-Known Member Supporter

    +2,762
    United States
    Melkite Catholic
    Private
    US-Others
  3. Sketcher

    Sketcher Born Imperishable

    +5,164
    Non-Denom
    Single
    US-Republican
    Well, even if he decided to upgrade it with razor wire, electrical currents, or enchantment, there's always tunnels to go under and boats to go around.
     
  4. Albion

    Albion Facilitator

    +21,486
    Anglican
    Married
    And he knows that as well as anyone else. But the argument itself is phony since it is also true that a good wall will reduce illegal crossings, make it easier for the Border Patrol to do its job, and so on.

    The "walls don't work" argument is entirely bogus, therefore, and especially since the Congressional leaders who use that argument themselves support a raft of public policies that they and everyone else know will not eliminate--absolutely--100%--whatever the problem is.

    But they still favor welfare laws, housing developments for the homeless, increased expenditures on education, "motor voter" registration, and so on. None of them will solve the respective problem 100%, so should we ask why the sponsors are interested in passing those laws and appropriating those funds?
     
  5. Tigger45

    Tigger45 St Francis Supporter

    +7,535
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Constitution
    That statement may be laughable but this one not so much. In fact it’s down right scary when you consider the more highly delicate top secret information he’s able to nonchalantly disseminate.

     
  6. ToBeLoved

    ToBeLoved Well-Known Member Supporter

    +5,668
    Non-Denom
    Private
  7. ToBeLoved

    ToBeLoved Well-Known Member Supporter

    +5,668
    Non-Denom
    Private
    Which is the top secret information?
     
  8. jayem

    jayem Naturalist

    +3,939
    Atheist
    Married
    Personally, I'm willing to give Trump his wall/fence if the REAL immigration problem is addressed. Which is the 11 million or so illegal immigrants already here. Many of who have lived here for years, and are working and paying taxes under assumed SSNs. The 2013 S.744 dealt exactly with this issue. It authorized 700 miles of physical barrier construction, along with more Border Patrol agents and electronic surveillance. And it provided a rational and humane pathway for otherwise law-abiding and gainfully employed undocumented immigrants to receive provisional legal alien status and eventually become citizens. The link has more details. Unfortunately, it wasn't even considered in the House.

    Someone please tell me what is wrong with this

    A Guide to S.744: Understanding the 2013 Senate Immigration Bill
     
  9. Albion

    Albion Facilitator

    +21,486
    Anglican
    Married
    Make that about 26 million instead. The Democratic Party line has been that it's only 11 million...for quite a few years now.

    Anyway, you are to be congratulated for saying you are willing to have the "REAL" immigration problem addressed. Too many politicians are of the opinion that since solving that problem would seem like an accomplishment of the President--and they cannot abide such a turn of events--they will oppose any steps in the direction of solving the problem in any way.
     
  10. jayem

    jayem Naturalist

    +3,939
    Atheist
    Married
    What you say applies to both sides. It's the pernicious effect of our politics being hijacked by these accursed "bases." The liberal base will fight tooth and nail against a wall. And the conservative base will do the same against anything resembling an amnesty. The tails wag the dogs so that neither side will compromise. And nothing substantive is ever accomplished. It's the most malignant aspect of modern American politics. But this is off-topic.
     
  11. Sketcher

    Sketcher Born Imperishable

    +5,164
    Non-Denom
    Single
    US-Republican
    I'm not an advocate for any of those positions, you'd have to ask one.

    I was in favor of what Trump proposed but the Democrats rejected - build/upgrade/repair walls where the Border Patrol actually wanted it, while increasing the courts and caseworkers for dealing with immigration fraud. But as the tunnels under San Diego's fence demonstrated, I am under no illusion that a massive wall will be circumvented, and I am not in favor of wasting the kind of money Trump wanted to spend on it.
     
  12. Albion

    Albion Facilitator

    +21,486
    Anglican
    Married
    I was simply calling these people and their arguments to mind.

    Well, consider that we have spent, this year, many times more dollars on dealing with illegal immigrants than the comparatively small appropriation requested for the wall. If even a limited extension of the wall had been erected, it would have paid for itself.
     
  13. Sketcher

    Sketcher Born Imperishable

    +5,164
    Non-Denom
    Single
    US-Republican
    It's an expensive problem in multiple ways, but how do we know that "a limited extension of the wall" would have paid for itself, and what size of extension are we talking about? Duncan Hunter wanted a $1 million wall, IIRC. How much does Trump want to spend?
     
  14. OldWiseGuy

    OldWiseGuy Wake me when it's soup. Supporter

    +6,727
    United States
    Protestant
    Single
    US-Others
    Mexican men and boys are good climbers. Women and kids not so much. If you look at our overtaxed schools and emergency departments all you see is...women and kids.

    Regarding working illegals paying into SS, let them fatten up the fund, then deport them.
     
  15. ToBeLoved

    ToBeLoved Well-Known Member Supporter

    +5,668
    Non-Denom
    Private
    How much does it cost us only in court costs to process claims.
     
Loading...