- Feb 5, 2002
- 166,476
- 56,164
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
'The Guardian published an article on 'what a pregnancy actually looks like at nine weeks' and literally removed the embryo and they think we are the ones promoting misinformation.'
The only problem? The embryos were actually removed before the photos were taken. As ethicist Charles Camosy put it: “So, Poppy Noor and the Guardian managed to do a story on what a pregnancy looks like (takeaway: “it doesn’t look like what you think”) and in the nine week photo, for instance, they removed the baby from the photo. This is not a joke! Amniotic sac only. This story should be flagged for misinformation everywhere.” Dr. Calum Miller had the same reaction: “The Guardian published an article on ‘what a pregnancy actually looks like at nine weeks’ and literally removed the embryo and they think we are the ones promoting misinformation.”
To sum up: A pro-abortion journalist, working with abortion activists, quite literally erased the human being that is the focal point of the abortion conversation and blatantly lied to make people more comfortable with killing pre-born children. This is insidious and disingenuous. For the record, here is embryoscopy footage showing what the child looks like at six weeks from the Endowment for Human Development; here, if you prefer, is how the Mayo Clinic portrays the child. From National Geographic’s Inside the Womb to any embryology textbook you can lay your hands on, the evidence is overwhelming and insurmountable: the Guardian is lying.
Continued below.
Pro-abortion extremists have no problem murdering the truth - LifeSite
The only problem? The embryos were actually removed before the photos were taken. As ethicist Charles Camosy put it: “So, Poppy Noor and the Guardian managed to do a story on what a pregnancy looks like (takeaway: “it doesn’t look like what you think”) and in the nine week photo, for instance, they removed the baby from the photo. This is not a joke! Amniotic sac only. This story should be flagged for misinformation everywhere.” Dr. Calum Miller had the same reaction: “The Guardian published an article on ‘what a pregnancy actually looks like at nine weeks’ and literally removed the embryo and they think we are the ones promoting misinformation.”
To sum up: A pro-abortion journalist, working with abortion activists, quite literally erased the human being that is the focal point of the abortion conversation and blatantly lied to make people more comfortable with killing pre-born children. This is insidious and disingenuous. For the record, here is embryoscopy footage showing what the child looks like at six weeks from the Endowment for Human Development; here, if you prefer, is how the Mayo Clinic portrays the child. From National Geographic’s Inside the Womb to any embryology textbook you can lay your hands on, the evidence is overwhelming and insurmountable: the Guardian is lying.
Continued below.
Pro-abortion extremists have no problem murdering the truth - LifeSite
