UPDATE III: Canon lawyer Ed Peters a frequent commenter on this post has weighed in on
his own blog: This is what happens when bizarre events (like an admitted practicing lesbian presenting herself for holy Communion in the first place), happen on the watch of priests whose love for the Eucharist probably exceeds their knowledge of the law on reception of holy Communion (through no fault of their own, doubtless), before a well-wired-world that can broadcast misinformation and even flatly wrong interpretations of an event with nary a care for correcting itself later. No matter who gets hurt along the way. And plenty of people have been hurt in this one.
I have expended
no little effort over many years (
like about 22) trying to get Canon 915 correctly understood and properly applied in ecclesiastical life. In the last few years, some signs of progress have appeared. Now, out of nowhere, Canon 915 is being invoked by some as justification for an action that, reading the facts as alleged in the light most favorable to the minister, would
not have justified his withholding holy Communion from the woman in question. Specifically, a few minutes conversation (if thats what happened), mostly with a third party (if thats what happened), would not suffice, in the face of numerous canons protecting the right of the faithful to receive the sacraments, to verify either the
notoriety of the (objectively) sinful situation, or to verify the
obstinacy of the would-be recipient,
both of which elements, among others in Canon 915,
mustbe demonstrated before withholding holy Communion.
RELATED:In the e-mail: I wanted you to know there is more to this story
Archdiocese of Washington sends apology to lesbian who was denied communion