- May 28, 2018
- 13,173
- 5,690
- 68
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Widowed
Many times, in many threads concerning, in particular, the question of whether God deciding all things makes him the one to blame for sin, and turns erstwhile free-willing agents into robots programmed to 'choose' what they do, and makes their choices mere illusion. In these threads, I have tried many times to explain what I do not myself understand in full (and still I happily admit that I do not) that God's economy is not ours, and that he is as much beyond us as the heavens are beyond the earth. I have tried to point out what a striking difference it is, and how our thinking is always based on false premises. There are doubtless better arguments for the purpose of showing the worthiness of the doctrine of predestination, but for the most part they seem ineffective in convincing anyone who doesn't want to see it.
Today, it occurs to me, that the following notion (which may well be misleading, so I leave it as speculation only, though I think it could be well supported by scripture), could be a useful way to get my point across. I point it out because I hope some will see that our anthropomorphic logic concerning "the way of things" concerning the work and person of God, simply does not apply to God in everything.
Some time back some of us participated in a thread where the difference between a possible Heavenly Language and any other language(s) was discussed. Today I was thinking about the way that God speaking caused things to happen:
It may well be, that what God speaks, IS the thing that came to pass.
IF the language of God is that different from human language, where our words are like containers in which to carry mere concepts poorly understood, then where is the consideration that his planning something to happen (which therefore will certainly happen), with every smallest detail planned, takes away actual choice? Or to look at it from the other direction, how do the many actions and reactions, choices and consequences, causes and effects that we commonly see and consider, all things that we might even consider as naturalism, were we atheists —how do these things compare with how he does things?
God, from a philosophical point of view, does no more and no less plan every detail, than that he spoke every fact, past, present and future, into existence. He need not plan, and then when his plan seems good, execute the plan. He need only speak. Other posters commenting here have said that to God, it is all the present. I believe he spoke his dwelling place into being, and the redeemed, the elect, are that place. He sees it as already done. He spoke it, and it is fact. How can anyone rate, then, whether every detail is also predestined to happen? The question does not show up on the scale of God's economy. That fact that we must line up cause and effect in a way that makes sense to us, is no measure of the validity of our thinking.
Today, it occurs to me, that the following notion (which may well be misleading, so I leave it as speculation only, though I think it could be well supported by scripture), could be a useful way to get my point across. I point it out because I hope some will see that our anthropomorphic logic concerning "the way of things" concerning the work and person of God, simply does not apply to God in everything.
Some time back some of us participated in a thread where the difference between a possible Heavenly Language and any other language(s) was discussed. Today I was thinking about the way that God speaking caused things to happen:
It may well be, that what God speaks, IS the thing that came to pass.
IF the language of God is that different from human language, where our words are like containers in which to carry mere concepts poorly understood, then where is the consideration that his planning something to happen (which therefore will certainly happen), with every smallest detail planned, takes away actual choice? Or to look at it from the other direction, how do the many actions and reactions, choices and consequences, causes and effects that we commonly see and consider, all things that we might even consider as naturalism, were we atheists —how do these things compare with how he does things?
God, from a philosophical point of view, does no more and no less plan every detail, than that he spoke every fact, past, present and future, into existence. He need not plan, and then when his plan seems good, execute the plan. He need only speak. Other posters commenting here have said that to God, it is all the present. I believe he spoke his dwelling place into being, and the redeemed, the elect, are that place. He sees it as already done. He spoke it, and it is fact. How can anyone rate, then, whether every detail is also predestined to happen? The question does not show up on the scale of God's economy. That fact that we must line up cause and effect in a way that makes sense to us, is no measure of the validity of our thinking.
Last edited: