- Jun 26, 2004
- 17,337
- 3,604
- Country
- Canada
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Others
Upvote
0
None, hopefully. They can only post in Controversial Christian Theology.Who on here are full-preterists?
I ask this as I truly do not know the answer at this point…as I see the first several chapters of Revelation being fulfilled in AD 70, where is Revelation not fulfilled? Where do we see a change in fulfilled prophecy to unfulfilled prophecy?None, hopefully. They can only post in Controversial Christian Theology.
I think JM addressed that.I ask this as I truly do not know the answer at this point…as I see the first several chapters of Revelation being fulfilled in AD 70, where is Revelation not fulfilled? Where do we see a change in fulfilled prophecy to unfulfilled prophecy?
I think they dovetail.“The civil magistrate cannot function without some ethical guidance, without some standard of good and evil. If that standard is not to be the revealed law of God… then what will it be? In some form or expression it will have to be the law of man (or men) - the standard of self-law or autonomy. And when autonomous laws come to govern a commonwealth, the sword is certainly wielded in vain, for it represents simply the brute force of some men’s will against the will of other men.” - Greg Bahnsen
Sorry, wrong forum, still a good quote.
It’s on my list at some point.I started The Mission of God by Joe Boot and it's deep but very encouraging.
I’ve watched it twice.Mandatory vax and passports got you down? Watch this for the first time or again.
It was just a joke.
Are you into theonomy as well?
I’m not decided. But right now, I lean to the “no” side.