Yep he is still connected. The life support was supposed to be disconnected Friday June 30th, but thankfully it was extended. In that time more doctors backed up the previous doctors that there were options. So hopefully the time bought will help. My guess is that the register article was written to go live when disconnection date was set and they did not change that line when the hospital asked for a new look from the court. The wording makes it seem like the author wrote it for June 30th and it was published late with some added info but not full editing. They should have paid better attention.
It remains the hospital should never have interfered with parental rights to begin with. I have long opposed these cases in the United States. There was one in Texas awhile ago where a child was taken off of life support against the parents wishes. Here it has only been the parents constant efforts and international outrage that changed the initial disconnection date and brought about the new move by the hospital when data was represented, which seems to have already been presented at different times.
All we can do is wait an pray. But I strongly support that parents and only the parents should be allowed to make end of life decisions for their children unless the parents are fairly judged incapable.
But for now, prayers for all.
