• Welcome to Christian Forums
  1. Welcome to Christian Forums, a forum to discuss Christianity in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to be able to join in fellowship with Christians all over the world.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon and God Bless!

  2. The forums in the Christian Congregations category are now open only to Christian members. Please review our current Faith Groups list for information on which faith groups are considered to be Christian faiths. Christian members please remember to read the Statement of Purpose threads for each forum within Christian Congregations before posting in the forum.
  3. Please note there is a new rule regarding the posting of videos. It reads, "Post a summary of the videos you post . An exception can be made for music videos.". Unless you are simply sharing music, please post a summary, or the gist, of the video you wish to share.
  4. There have been some changes in the Life Stages section involving the following forums: Roaring 20s, Terrific Thirties, Fabulous Forties, and Golden Eagles. They are changed to Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X, and Golden Eagles will have a slight change.
  5. CF Staff, Angels and Ambassadors; ask that you join us in praying for the world in this difficult time, asking our Holy Father to stop the spread of the virus, and for healing of all affected.
  6. We are no longer allowing posts or threads that deny the existence of Covid-19. Members have lost loved ones to this virus and are grieving. As a Christian site, we do not need to add to the pain of the loss by allowing posts that deny the existence of the virus that killed their loved one. Future post denying the Covid-19 existence, calling it a hoax, will be addressed via the warning system.

Politifact: 93% of Rush Limbaugh's Claims are Half-True, Mostly False, False or Worse

Discussion in 'American Politics' started by Dale, Jan 11, 2015.

  1. Dale

    Dale Senior Veteran Supporter

    +1,038
    Protestant
    Single
    US-Democrat
    According to Politifact, an incredible 82% of Rush Limbaugh's claims fall into the categories of Mostly False, False or Pants on Fire. Atrocious lies are rated “Pants on Fire.” If you add in claims that are Half True, the figure goes up to 93%.


    In other words, Politifact finds that about 7% of what Rush Limbaugh says is true. That's not very much.






    Link:
    http://www.politifact.com/personalities/rush-limbaugh/


    *


    *
     
    We teamed up with Faith Counseling. Can they help you today?
  2. iluvatar5150

    iluvatar5150 Well-Known Member

    +18,358
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Democrat

    Rush is a dishonest fear-peddler, but no, that's not what the Politifact numbers say. What the numbers say is that OF THE CLAIMS THAT THEY CHOOSE TO ANALYZE, those percentages are true/false. I'm not aware of any place that Politifact claims that their selection is statistically representative of the whole of Limbaugh's statements.
     
  3. variant

    variant Happy Cat

    +5,561
    Agnostic
    Single
    I don't care for Limbaugh but this is misleading.

    You mean 93% of the statements they made a ruling on.

    Do you think Politifiact spends a lot of their time looking for statements made by Rush Limbaugh that are true?
     
  4. Dale

    Dale Senior Veteran Supporter

    +1,038
    Protestant
    Single
    US-Democrat
    Perhaps Limbaugh's biggest lie of 2014 is the claim that the Obama Administration planned the influx of children over the border with Mexico. Politifact rated this claim as “Pants on Fire,” in other words, an atrocious lie.


    This rating is informed by the views of members of the Border Patrol and other people with direct experience of the situation. There is a difference between planning for a predictable crisis and causing the crisis, Politifact explains.


    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]*[/FONT]


    [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]*[/FONT]
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2015
  5. Avid

    Avid A Pilgrim and a Sojourner...

    +659
    Baptist
    Married
    Rush Limbaugh's opinions are independently audited, and certified to be 98.7% right. (That number may be more or less, as it is audited regularly.)
     
  6. iluvatar5150

    iluvatar5150 Well-Known Member

    +18,358
    United States
    Christian
    Married
    US-Democrat
    You know that's just a long-running joke, right? There is no "opinion audit."
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/07/07/992231/-Limbaugh-Lies-to-13-Year-Old-Girl

    The Sullivan Group:
    Sullivan Group


    Only his opinions are allegedly audited, not his misstatements of fact:
    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2009/08/14/eib_accuracy_rating_methodology

    And when he gets something wrong, it's his staff's fault (which is part of the joke):
    http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2009/04/22/why_not_a_100_accuracy_rating
     
  7. NightHawkeye

    NightHawkeye Work-in-progress Supporter

    +9,666
    Methodist
    Married
    ^^^ this ^^^
     
  8. FreeinChrist

    FreeinChrist CF Advisory team Staff Member Site Advisor Supporter

    +13,110
    United States
    Baptist
    Married
    US-Democrat
    True. But he does make a lot of false statements.
     
  9. cow451

    cow451 The Most Interesting Poster in the Forum Supporter

    +19,165
    United States
    Baptist
    Married
    US-Others
    Audited by the independent firm Dittohead and Associates......:cool:
     
  10. variant

    variant Happy Cat

    +5,561
    Agnostic
    Single
    To produce so many lies that must mean the man talks endlessly. ;)
     
  11. keith99

    keith99 sola dosis facit venenum

    +5,417
    Atheist
    Single
    Seems it is worse than that. He gave the name of the firm and they are an investment advice firm. As such they would not even have an auditing department.

    Oops.
     
  12. grandvizier1006

    grandvizier1006 Still a human by God's grace Supporter

    +2,477
    United States
    Christian
    Single
    US-Others
    You know who will be happiest about this? Michael Savage! :D

    Until, of course, they go after him... :D
     
    Last edited: Jan 12, 2015
  13. Veritas

    Veritas 1 Lord, 1 Faith, 1 Baptism

    +2,681
    Non-Denom
    Private
    US-Libertarian
    I guess we should all trust MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, NYT, WAPO, etc. for the truth. These outlets never lie and are 100% accurate.

    On the other hand, it's not a very fair comparison. Afterall, Limbaugh is not a news outlet. His is an opinion based, political entertainment radio show. The others claim to be a source of news. And therein lies the difference.
     
  14. Avid

    Avid A Pilgrim and a Sojourner...

    +659
    Baptist
    Married
    When those who oppose him wish to belittle him, they agree that he is JUST AN ENTERTAINER, so as to say no one should take what he says seriously.

    They try to have their cake and eat it , too. If we check, we can probably find some of those among these posters!
     
  15. Dale

    Dale Senior Veteran Supporter

    +1,038
    Protestant
    Single
    US-Democrat

    Where I live, many folks believe that Rush Limbaugh is a source of news.

    As for the other outlets you mention, that would be a different thread, wouldn't it?

    *

    *
     
  16. KWCrazy

    KWCrazy Newbie

    +1,969
    Christian
    Married
    US-Republican
    Politifact writers are liberal liars for hire so nothing they say has any credibility.
    read
    this
     
  17. KWCrazy

    KWCrazy Newbie

    +1,969
    Christian
    Married
    US-Republican
    Sorry but the lie is your denial.
    Here's another source with an actual copy of the government ad.
    Read

    Here is another source citing the government's advertisement.

    Rush was right. Your source is deliberately lying.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 13, 2015
  18. Brandonspapa

    Brandonspapa Newbie

    97
    +1
    Non-Denom
    Married
    US-Others
    People who base their lives and ideals on a talk show host aren't very (I don't want to say educated) sophisticated and are very opinionated without having the ability to discern partial truth from political truth. While most politically conservative talk show hosts, as long as they deal in facts, such as the results of liberal actions and their words, stick to that, they are right on; but when they start to interject their personal conservative and religious view into their commentary, that is where the listener needs to be able to discern between the latter. Liberal talk show fails miserably because everyone who listens, whether conservative or liberal in their politics, know that what they are saying are bold faced lies; while conservative talk shows succeed because the majority of what they say is true as proven by recent historical events. One must learn where to draw the line where it comes to biting into the rhetoric.
     
  19. TerranceL

    TerranceL Sarcasm is kind of an art isn't it?

    +4,549
    Atheist
    Single
    US-Libertarian
    About a decade ago when I was a republican I was listening to him in the car. He was talking about something a reporter said that was amazingly anti-american.

    The biggest mistake he made that day? He made the error of actually playing the reporters comments just before he told us what she "really meant" her words were 180 to what he claimed she actually meant.

    Few years later same thing happened with Hannity, he made the claim that one of the Kennedys made a pretty wild statement. So wild that I had to actually look up what the man had said, it took an amazing amount of stretching and pulling to take what the man had actually said to what Hannity claimed he said.

    If the only way to advance your cause is by deception perhaps you should rethink your cause.
     
  20. KWCrazy

    KWCrazy Newbie

    +1,969
    Christian
    Married
    US-Republican
    If I held to that perception then I would brand all liberals as insane liars and never converse with them at all. Part of what we all bring to any discussion is our own perspective. We use this perspective to interpret things we see and hear. What we see and hear may be interpreted differently depending on our viewpoint. For example, you may hear "share the wealth" and think it's altruism. I hear "share the wealth" and I hear socialist dogma. Perhaps some read disdain for the military into Obama's pronunciation of the word "corpseman."

    For the record, I've never seen Hannity or Limbaugh deliberately lie about a subject, though I admit I don't always see things the way they do. Al Sharpton, however, is a bold faced liar. Funny how you never see any articles about his veracity rating.
     
Loading...