If there is only one kingdom (ridiculous statement), and Christ's kingdom is not of this world and not of this realm, then your universe has no kingdoms at all. Paul speaks of "His heavenly kingdom" in 2Tim. 4:18. Scripture says: [2 Tim. 4:18][/indent]
His kingdom not being of this world does not mean it does not include the earth. You've got a false equivalency error going there, Terral.
No, an appeal to 1 Kings 12 does not trump what God inspired Peter to say. Acts 2 trumps Hosea, Joel, and 1 Kings. What was veiled in the OT has been revealed in the NT. The OT informs the NT and the NT interprets the OT.1. His Heavenly Kingdom.
2. David's kingdom.
Already your "one kingdom" theory (nothing to do with this topic) is shown to be false. This is how you "quote >>" from the OP to show something false using Scripture, if you ever want to write on this topic.
You've got to learn some basics of proper hermeneutics.
Peter informed the Pentecost audience the prophesies about David's throne were fulfilled with Christ's resurrection and ascension.
Acts 2:22-37
“Men of Israel, hear these words: Jesus of Nazareth, a man attested to you by God with mighty works and wonders and signs that God did through him in your midst, as you yourselves know— this Jesus, delivered up according to the definite plan and foreknowledge of God, you crucified and killed by the hands of lawless men. God raised him up, loosing the pangs of death, because it was not possible for him to be held by it. For David says concerning him, ‘I saw the Lord always before me, for he is at my right hand that I may not be shaken; therefore my heart was glad, and my tongue rejoiced; my flesh also will dwell in hope. For you will not abandon my soul to Hades, or let your Holy One see corruption. You have made known to me the paths of life; you will make me full of gladness with your presence.’ Brothers, I may say to you with confidence about the patriarch David that he both died and was buried, and his tomb is with us to this day. Being therefore a prophet, and knowing that God had sworn with an oath to him that he would set one of his descendants on his throne, he foresaw and spoke about the resurrection of the Christ, that he was not abandoned to Hades, nor did his flesh see corruption. This Jesus God raised up, and of that we all are witnesses. Being therefore exalted at the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, he has poured out this that you yourselves are seeing and hearing. For David did not ascend into the heavens, but he himself says, ‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.’ Let all the house of Israel therefore know for certain that God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified.” Now when they heard this they were cut to the heart...."
Read it through a couple of times until the significance of what Peter is saying is fully understood.
The matter is plainly stated: David spoke about the resurrection of Christ.
That's what the text states, not what I made it say.
Go take a look at 2 Samuel 7. There you will note God asks David rhetorically when has He ever lived in a house built by human hands? Surely you know of the many places in scripture where it is stated, "God does not live in houses built by human hands" (see Isaiah 66:1, Acts 7:48, and Acts 17:24). God tells David three persons will build His house: 1) God Himself would build that house, 2) God's son would build that house, and 3) David's son would build that house.
Look it up.
In other words, three people would build David's house. Or it would be one person who fulfilled all three criteria! David was told the person would be a descendant of David's, that person's rule would last forever, and he would be a man of peace.
Look it up.
David, thinking his next child would be the one to fulfill that prophesy named his next son "Solomon," because Solomon" means peace. It is true Israel did eventually enjoy a period of peace under Solomon but it was only after a few executions and wars solidified his rule and in the end Solomon, like all the other kings was an adulterous and idolatrous king who declared all of life "Vanity! Vanity!" "Meaningless! Meaningless!" Why was David prohibited from building God's house? Because he had blood on his hands! So did Solomon. Note not only was he not a man of peace but Solomon was eighth or ninth in line for the throne. He was not the heir. God named the boy Jedidiah (2 Sam. 12:25) but David named him Peace in a fleshly effort to fulfill the prophesies he'd learned from God. Lastly, when David is on his death bed and he recounts what God told him.... he changes what God said (1 Chr. 22).
Look it all up, Terral. See that what I have posted is correct.
Jesus is the three-in-one temple builder whose reign will never end. Jesus is the man, the Prince of Peace. David could not fathom that God Himself would come to earth, that he would die and resurrect defeating death, and God Himself would come live in humans. The New Testament tells us all these things are true. We are the temple of God (1 Cor. 3:16)! We are the co-heirs of Christ who will be seated with Christ on his throne (Rev. 3:21). We are the royal priesthood - the recombining of the civil and religious rule into one role, just as it was in Eden, in Salem, in the Judges, in Christ, and now with the converts to Christ where there is neither Jew nor Greek, male nor female, slave nor free.
You already know these things to be correct.
In other words, the heavenly kingdom and the Davidic throne are ot mutually exclusive conditions. Peter stated it quite plainly in Acts 2:30-31. The prophesies about the Davidic throne must be understood through what God told everyone on the day of Pentecost:
David was speaking of Christ's resurrection.
God was speaking of Christ's resurrection.
Adjust thinking, doctrine, and practice accordingly.
Upvote
0