No, but one set of anecdotal experiences does not trump statistical analysis.
There is more to life than #! However, I bet I could come up with some #s, if I were interested, which I'm not.
I know and understood what I saw .....
Upvote
0
No, but one set of anecdotal experiences does not trump statistical analysis.
There is more to life than #! However, I bet I could come up with some #s, if I were interested, which I'm not.
I know and understood what I saw .....
Well, I know and understand the opposite.
Now what?
See, anyone can make silly meaningless assertions like that.
Which representatives or senators specifically?
Ok, I assume u lived in military housing, and on base and were really not exposed to societal standards? Living on base in another country is not the same thing as living in another country, in their society. U were not living and working under their jurisdiction and ways of living.
Even though u were probably working under the harshest conditions, and I respect u for that, it can not be compared to living under their rule and doing things their way.
I'm sorry I didn't get back to you. I've been up on the Christian Current Events. Here is a link. If it doesn't work just look up "members of Congress in Communist Party".
SOCIALIST PARTY OF AMERICA IDENTIFIES 70 MEMBERS OF CONGRESS WHO ARE MEMBERS OF THEIR CONGRESSIONAL CAUCUS
Hey, I don't consider them silly and meaningless. I might not be able to talk the jargon, but I still know what works and what doesn't!
Ok, I assume u lived in military housing, and on base and were really not exposed to societal standards? Living on base in another country is not the same thing as living in another country, in their society. U were not living and working under their jurisdiction and ways of living.
Even though u were probably working under the harshest conditions, and I respect u for that, it can not be compared to living under their rule and doing things their way.
What is "libertynewsonline"? Sounds like some John Birtch Society website.
Wrong. I'm on my fourth year living out in the untamed wilds of the UK economy. I'm a contractor now, a civvie. I work on base, but I get my healthcare from NHS and I rent a house from a kind old British couple.
You seem to do a lot of assuming about things you really don't know anything about.
The point is that anyone can make an assertion about what works.
You assert one thing, I just asserted the opposite.
Now how is one supposed to tell the difference between the two?
This is why your method is silly and meaningless. You need to look beyond one person's viewpoint to get a better idea of what is going on, and disparaging facts and terminology as numbers and jargon isn't helping you.
Ok, lets go back to the cutsy analogy of "If it what walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....then it must be duck.....and NOT a turkey."
President Barack Obama is preparing to invoke the powers given to him under 50 USC Chapter 13 to hold that various American States are now in a state of insurrection thus allowing him to invoke the National Emergencies Act under 50 USC § 1621 and invoke the highly controversial continuity of government plan for the United States allowing him, in essence, to rule with supreme powers.
Specifically, this bulletin says, Obama will invoke 50 USC § 212 that states: the President shall have declared by proclamation that the laws of the United States are opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.
Obama will outline in his reasonings for declaring a state of emergency, this bulletin continues, are the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), otherwise known as Obamacare.
Preparing to oppose Obama, should he, in fact, declare a National State of Emergency is the US military who themselves are preparing to invoke 50 USC § 842 which allows them to protect America from The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof
The Total Collapse
Paxton25 said:President Barack Obama is preparing to invoke the powers given to him under 50 USC Chapter 13 to hold that various American States are now in a state of insurrection thus allowing him to invoke the National Emergencies Act under 50 USC § 1621 and invoke the highly controversial continuity of government plan for the United States allowing him, in essence, to rule with supreme powers. Specifically, this bulletin says, Obama will invoke 50 USC § 212 that states: the President shall have declared by proclamation that the laws of the United States are opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings. Obama will outline in his reasonings for declaring a state of emergency, this bulletin continues, are the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), otherwise known as Obamacare. Preparing to oppose Obama, should he, in fact, declare a National State of Emergency is the US military who themselves are preparing to invoke 50 USC § 842 which allows them to protect America from The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof The Total Collapse
Right back at u....I know more than u think.
President Barack Obama is preparing to invoke the powers given to him under 50 USC Chapter 13 to hold that various American States are now in a state of insurrection thus allowing him to invoke the National Emergencies Act under 50 USC § 1621 and invoke the highly controversial continuity of government plan for the United States allowing him, in essence, to rule with supreme powers.
Specifically, this bulletin says, Obama will invoke 50 USC § 212 that states: the President shall have declared by proclamation that the laws of the United States are opposed, and the execution thereof obstructed, by combinations too powerful to be suppressed by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.
Obama will outline in his reasonings for declaring a state of emergency, this bulletin continues, are the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) and Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), otherwise known as Obamacare.
Preparing to oppose Obama, should he, in fact, declare a National State of Emergency is the US military who themselves are preparing to invoke 50 USC § 842 which allows them to protect America from The Communist Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to overthrow the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof
The Total Collapse
So, I mean, Paxton.
This didn't happen. It didn't come close to happening.
So, what's the rub? Are you gonna be more critical of crazy allegations like this in the future? Can we expect more of the same from you?
Because let's be real. Your source lied to you. There was no bulletin. No plans existed to take unusual actions.
When is this supposed to take place? Unless I missed it, your posting doesn't say when.
Lol. No seriously guys, the sky is falling!!