My posts were IN THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE PERSON WAS IN FACT GUILTY. Like, the person had even truthfully admitted it.
I think that going off on a tangent about whether or not the person is guilty is in the effort of empathizing with the pedophile. Again, I was speaking HYPOTHETICALLY ABOUT THE ASSUMPTION THAT THE PERSON IS GUILTY. It is off-topic from the point that pedophiles deserve punishment, and was intentionally thrown in to sway and confuse people replying to the post, thereby they assert no opinion because they don't know what the purpose of the thread is. Just my opinion.
So tell me. What do you do with a person that is beyond reasonable doubt a pedophile? What if you could get into their minds, see their thoughts, and you realize that they were pedophiles indeed, as they have memories of raping children? What do you do with them? Do you then cast doubt on the person's memory to keep them from having to be accountable???
kiwimac, are you sure you're not Cephalic Carnage? If so, that is sad, inventing people to back up your own claims.