That's a fail. You said you had evidence of thousands. You have given none. That's zero. A big fat nought. Just one or two might have done to further the discussion (and I could have given you those myself - though correlation and causation aren't the same thing). But you have nothing whatsoever.
You made the figure up. And you have no evidence. All you are saying is that people have died after receiving it and you think that's evidence! Where are you getting this nonsense from? You are constantly being called to task on producing anything at all to back up what you say and you never come up with anything whatsoever.
Maybe you think it just gets lost in the flurry of posts. But that ain't so. You are developing a reputation. Someone used a good term in another thread to describe people who keep coming up empty. All hat and no cattle.
Very applicable in this case.
Thousands are those with VAERS reports indicating a death after receiving the vaccine. That being said, VAERS reports, in of themselves, are evidence of very little.
However, with the articles posted, you can see a trend. The trend is that regardless of people dying right after getting the vaccine, and medical professionals attesting that the side effects of the vaccine contributed to that persons death, the official conclusion is "there was no connection to the death", hence the official numbers of deaths from the vaccine remain at close to nil.
If one wants to vouch for the reliability of data provided by pharmaceutical companies, and the government agencies which approve their products, one only need look to the opioid epidemic to see the same players making false representations about their products, letting vast amounts of human suffering ensue, and settling up with a large cash fine after raking in the dough on a dangerous product. After the damage is done, a mea culpa and a cash settlement always absolves one from responsibility of any harmful consequences, right?
Upvote
0