Officers shouldn’t have fired into Breonna Taylor’s home, internal Louisville police report says

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,237
36,550
Los Angeles Area
✟829,243.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
LINK

Newly released documents from an internal probe into the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor shows two investigators determined that none of the officers involved in serving a 2020 narcotics warrant at the 26-year-old's apartment should have fired their gun, but the findings were contradicted by senior officials in the Louisville Metro Police Department, according to a new report from two investigators.

Sgt. Andrew Meyer of the police department's Professional Standards Unit determined in a preliminary report dated Dec. 4 that the three officers involved in the March 13, 2020, shooting should have held their fire after Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, shot one of them, according to the documents obtained by ABC News.

Meyer made a preliminary finding that Louisville police Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly, who was shot in the leg during the incident, and former officers Myles Cosgrove and Brett Hankison all allegedly violated department use-of-force policy by ignoring the significant risk of hitting someone who did not pose a threat, the internal report reads.

Meyer's preliminary report findings were supported by his lieutenant, Jeff Artman.

While Cosgrove and Hankison were both fired for violating police department policy stemming from the shooting, Mattingly was cleared of wrongdoing by former interim Louisville police Chief Yvette Gentry, who overruled Meyer's recommendation that all three officers face discipline for violating department policy.

[Hankison is still awaiting trial on wanton endangerment charges relating to people in the next apartment.]
 

Ana the Ist

Aggressively serene!
Feb 21, 2012
37,575
11,394
✟437,177.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
LINK

Newly released documents from an internal probe into the fatal shooting of Breonna Taylor shows two investigators determined that none of the officers involved in serving a 2020 narcotics warrant at the 26-year-old's apartment should have fired their gun, but the findings were contradicted by senior officials in the Louisville Metro Police Department, according to a new report from two investigators.

Sgt. Andrew Meyer of the police department's Professional Standards Unit determined in a preliminary report dated Dec. 4 that the three officers involved in the March 13, 2020, shooting should have held their fire after Taylor's boyfriend, Kenneth Walker, shot one of them, according to the documents obtained by ABC News.

Meyer made a preliminary finding that Louisville police Sgt. Jonathan Mattingly, who was shot in the leg during the incident, and former officers Myles Cosgrove and Brett Hankison all allegedly violated department use-of-force policy by ignoring the significant risk of hitting someone who did not pose a threat, the internal report reads.

Meyer's preliminary report findings were supported by his lieutenant, Jeff Artman.

While Cosgrove and Hankison were both fired for violating police department policy stemming from the shooting, Mattingly was cleared of wrongdoing by former interim Louisville police Chief Yvette Gentry, who overruled Meyer's recommendation that all three officers face discipline for violating department policy.

[Hankison is still awaiting trial on wanton endangerment charges relating to people in the next apartment.]

Yeesh.

I suppose an argument can be made that if they didn't at least know where the shot came from they shouldn't have fired back.

I didn't think that was the issue though.
 
Upvote 0

SummerMadness

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
18,201
11,829
✟331,677.00
Faith
Catholic
As usual, the dysfunction of our policing system rears its ugly head. They are so intent on providing cover for these blatant acts if misconduct, but when you see how they actually investigate things, they know it's wrong. But whatever, never punish anyone for murdering an unarmed woman who was sleeping.
 
Upvote 0

disciple Clint

Well-Known Member
Mar 26, 2018
15,258
5,991
Pacific Northwest
✟208,189.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
As usual, the dysfunction of our policing system rears its ugly head. They are so intent on providing cover for these blatant acts if misconduct, but when you see how they actually investigate things, they know it's wrong. But whatever, never punish anyone for murdering an unarmed woman who was sleeping.
As usual, the dysfunction of our policing system rears its ugly head. They are so intent on providing cover for these blatant acts if misconduct
Quite to the contrary the investigation was not any kind of a cover up as it clearly concludes that the officers violated policy by firing at an unidentified target. There is no excuse for making unjustified derogatory comments about the police by saying that this is a cover up or dysfunctional in anyway.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Stranger in a Strange Land
Oct 17, 2011
33,237
36,550
Los Angeles Area
✟829,243.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Quite to the contrary the investigation was not any kind of a cover up as it clearly concludes that the officers violated policy by firing at an unidentified target.

This internal report called for punishing all three officers. The interim police chief only punished two of them.
 
Upvote 0