Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just because somebody goes to a church with a given theology doesn't mean that they subscribe to it.
Especially if one attends that church for twenty yearsYes, but it is generally accepted to be a pretty good indicator.
IE, if one attends a Mormon church or a Baptist church, chances are that one is either a Mormon or a Baptist as the case may be.
Pay no attention. Not worth our time.
Trying to avoid the issue by making every bad thing said about Bush over the past eight years about me is proof of that.
Ringo
Pay no attention
King sounds like the man who isn't fit for office. This is no different that the anti-Catholic sentiment used in the past to smear candidates about their 'allegiance' to the pope. The GOP is demonstrating that same level of desperation.Aside from Rev Wright, national security will be what ends Obama's career. From AP today:
Rep. King: Al-Qaida would celebrate Obama victory
Let us not forget Obama's associate, Raila Odinga, promised Muslims in Kenya Sharia law if they voted for him in last Kenyan election.
Some background on the policies the man who flew to Iowa to endorse Barack Hussein Obama is promoting in Kenya:
The roots of the violence [/url]
"Majimbo" sounds familiar, doesn't it?
More questions the Democrat needs to answerJust wonderful:
Obama and FARC
Well....at least we know now. We didn't know about Ng Lap Seng, Riady and the others until Clinton had been elected. We didn't know about the KGB mole in the Carter campaign and Carter's approach to the Soviet embassy for help with his reelection until the 1990s.
If I recall, this wouldn't be the first time Democrats bailed on people we were previously helping in South America.1. Is it true Obama would cut off Plan Colombia military aid to our ally, which would serve the terrorist group FARC's interests?
2. Does Obama still oppose a free trade agreement for Colombia, even though that puts him on the same side as FARC in the debate?
3. Does Obama know or care that one of his staffers or supporters is claiming to disclose his positions in secret meetings with FARC terrorists outside government channels?
4. Can he tell us why his supporters would pass on such information to terrorists, and what he or she could gain from it?
5. Will Obama, as president, treat FARC as the serious terrorists they are, given that they still hold three Americans hostage?
Does Obama know or care that one of his staffers or supporters is claiming to disclose his positions in secret meetings with FARC terrorists outside government channels?
What about
"Does Investors Daily have any evidence this is true?"
So some guy talks to two Americans and suddenly they are Obama staffers or supporters?
Where is the evidence that they were supporters or staffers of Obama? Make no mistake, that article is not journalism. It is editorial based on what the author wants to be true, not what is true.
Pretty thin. Is there a Youtube video that could perhaps provide more evidence?
Im having trouble understanding all the speculation around obama and islamic rule. Where is this criticism for the bush admin paving the way for Sharia law in iraq? They allowed the Shiite dominated government to make their verison of islam the official state religion and no law may be passed that contradicts Islam. Have a feeling many peeps are ignorant of this fact.
Sounds like you gots some research to do if you would like to dis-prove the information in the article.
Once a Democrat declares a news story to not be journalism, no further proof is necessary.
Just like I saidNo, I appropriately pointed out the burden of proof was not met to support the conclusions. That is a fair demonstration that the article is not journalism.
That it appears on the Editorials and Opinions page is another good indicator.
Once a Democrat declares a news story to not be journalism, no further proof is necessary.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?