Ana the Ist
Aggressively serene!
This part makes sense to me -
"So there's been a whole lot of people thinking and theorizing about white supremacy. And all of these scholars share a view that I share, that whiteness is not the same thing as white people and that whiteness is actually better understood as a political project that has emerged historically, and that is dynamic and that is always changing. And so whiteness as an ideology is rooted in America's history of white supremacy - right? - which has to do with the legacy of slavery or Indigenous dispossession or Jim Crow".
They could clear up some of the confusion by using different terminology.
That makes sense to you?
I see that and immediately notice that whiteness never actually gets defined.
Would you be able to describe whiteness based on that paragraph?
Upvote
0