So, this is all a rehash of the recently debunked Nicene Truth blog posts right?
When viewed in light of Benedict's obviously orthodox and Nicene compliant Christology in his recent book
Jesus of Nazareth these charges, made originally on 11/13 by Jan Dyer are outlandish.
I urge my fellow Catholics not to waste time even getting upset about this and to most certainly not debate this issue. Jay Dyer's arguments in his blog and in his comments on other blogs (where this all stems from) contain such other gems as:
We are not interested in charity towards men like Ratzinger and John Paul II who participate in demonic religious services and are destroying the Faith.
Since this issue and the view of Benedict as Nestorian was originally instigated by that blog and the author who holds such a bias view, I recommend that my fellow Catholics do not open a debate on this issue...since it lacks all credence and respectability. Of course a point can have validity even if the author does not. But in this case neither the point (when viewed in light of the total body of the Pope's writings) or the author (with his outlandish hate speech) have merit.
Our brothers and sisters can figure that out for themselves. And part of the road to real unity is trusting that they will on their own...just as we would in any false charge against them. Because if we do not view each other in love and compassion, then a true unity is smoke and mirrors.
Give our brothers and sisters the respect that they will reject the obviously foolish charge after thinking upon it with any serious thought and looking at the body of the Pope's Christology.
For the curious who want one of the many debunks of Mr. Dyers obviously foolish charges and intentionally out of context rants read the blog post at the Divine Lamp:
Post
...
