into the priesthood
Did he appoint himself?
How about Melchizedek?
How was he called?
Did he appoint himself?
Doesn't say. But Christ didn't.
Psalm110:4
The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.
So, you're thinking Christ called Himself and appointed Himself priest forever.
If not, this is a waste of time.
I am merely offering that the Priesthood of Aaron and that of Melchizedek are not the same...
And that your subjection of Christ to the rules of the Aaronic Priesthood is most likely misplaced...
Because Christ is the "Priestifier" of the Priesthood...
Both before, during, and after His Incarnation...
Arsenios
The concept is the same. Christ didn't appoint/glorify himself. He was baptized by John,
Heb. 5:5-6
So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest; but he that said unto him, Thou art my Son, to day have I begotten thee. As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
Phil 2:7 But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
There you have it -
As a human being, He was not baptized into the Priesthood...
Arsenios
From this morning's Epistle Reading at the Entry of our Lord into the Temple at 40 days of age where He was met by Symeon, long awaiting:
Heb 7:15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,
Heb 7:16 Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.
Heb 7:17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
Heb 7:20 And inasmuch as not without an oath He was made priest:
Heb 7:21
but this with an Oath by Him that said unto Him,
"The Lord swore and will not repent,
'Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:'")
He was entered into this Priesthood by God's Oath...
God-Appointed...
UNLIKE the Priesthood of Aaron...
Arsenios
A happy and blessed Feast of the Presentation of Jesus.
Yes, Christ was God appointed. That was my point. Christ did not appoint Himself (glorify Himself into the priesthood per Heb. 5:5).From this morning's Epistle Reading at the Entry of our Lord into the Temple at 40 days of age where He was met by Symeon, long awaiting:
Heb 7:15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,
Heb 7:16 Who is made, not after the law of a carnal commandment, but after the power of an endless life.
Heb 7:17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
Heb 7:20 And inasmuch as not without an oath He was made priest:
Heb 7:21
but this with an Oath by Him that said unto Him,
"The Lord swore and will not repent,
'Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:'")
He was entered into this Priesthood by God's Oath...
God-Appointed...
UNLIKE the Priesthood of Aaron...
Arsenios
Yes, Christ was God appointed.
That was my point.
Christ did not appoint Himself
(glorify Himself into the priesthood per Heb. 5:5).
The difference between what we're saying is
apparently you think Symeon appointed Him,
whereas it was done at His baptism
(suffice for righteousness sake - not to appoint yourself, though Christ could have).
Tricky thing to separate things, rather than view the whole.The Mystery here is that Christ is also God...
There is no time when Christ is not God...
This is where it is essential to keep the context of the TWO NATURES of Christ...
In His human nature, He was obedient to His Father in Heaven...
And in this human nature, His Father made Him High Priest...
After the Order of Melchizedek...
An Eternal Order... God Appointed... Not given by man at all...
I am saying God alone appointed Him...
It was between Him and the Father alone...
That would take it out of the realm of the Eternal Order of Melchizedek...
And place it in the hands of John the Baptist...
The Baptism of Christ was needed for the fulfillment of all righteousness...
That is what Scripture states...
Christ IS Righteousness...
We are Baptized INTO Christ...
Therefore it was done for OUR righteousness...
And NOT for Christ's, which you seem to imply...
Arsenios
Tricky thing to separate things, rather than view the whole.
Heb. 5:5-6
So also Christ glorified not himself to be made an high priest;
but He that said unto Him,
"Thou art my Son,
today have I begotten Thee."
As He saith also in another place,
"Thou art a priest for ever
after the order of Melchizedek".
Yes, and He said unto Him, when?Indeed...
"He that said unto Him," is God the Father...
The Priesthood of Melchizedek is eternal...
Therefore ONLY God can appoint it...
Yes, and He said unto Him, when?
A happy and blessed Feast of the Presentation of Jesus.
Beautiful painting.
I can't believe that Lent is almost ready to begin.
May our sinless Mother help us to prepare well for our union with the Crucified Lord.
That's the point. Unlike Aaron, Christ could have, but He didn't. Like Moses with Aaron, John baptized Christ. And it was in the order of Melchizedek, meaning no beginning or ending, as you grasped.BYZ – Heb. 5:5-6
ουτως και ο χριστος ουχ εαυτον εδοξασεν
So also the Christ not Himself did glorify
γενηθηναι αρχιερεα
to have been birthed High Priest
That's the point.
Unlike Aaron, Christ could have, but He didn't.
Like Moses with Aaron, John baptized Christ.
And it was in the order of Melchizedek, meaning no beginning or ending, as you grasped.