New York Times has Trump’s tax data...

[camille70]

And that is the problem viewed from the U.K. we don’t have aparty political axe to grind : but is obvious that there has been a deliberate and sustained campaign to attack and undermine trump using innuendo and shadows, and every dirty trick in the book. In this case pure hearsay given apparent credence.

The resignation of Weiss demonstrates that a once proud reliable journalism at NYT has been replaced with a woke partite mouthpiece. In which being a “ centrist required bravery” said Weiss. Like mUch US media NYT perhaps should be reclassified “ entertainment” not “ news”


The story here is not trump. It is breach of trust by whatever official leaked private confidential information. Any citizen has the right to expect all information is confidential other than that discovered using proper process and having demonstrated cause for legal discovery.
That is the law. Or is protection of law only for people who are liked?

So is it hearsay or a leak?

 

[Kenny'sID]

Not true, I'll believe it when I see it, or when it's been proven the truth.

The camp that I am NOT in, is the one that indicates guilt before proven so.

 

[camille70]

Trump hotels and resorts are not doing well now when favor-seekers stay at his properties and hold their events there. Should he lose the presidency, they would have no reason to spend their money at his venues.

Actually I read that some of the people paying him have multi year contracts with Trump. They may have to continue to do business with him, even if he loses.

 

[pescador]

Not true, I'll believe it when I see it, or when it's been proven the truth.

The camp that I am NOT in, is the one that indicates guilt before proven so.

Read the NY Times. They have the proof. Trump and his family have tried to conceal their (beyond disgraceful) shafting of the American people by not supporting the US by paying their share of their taxes.

 

[Arcangl86]

And there’s a rather giant question mark over why exactly they have been willing to do so when all the other banks want no part of him. And that question keeps coming back to Russia.

It could also be nothing more sinister then Germany having more creditor friendly laws.

 

[Kenny'sID]

In my first post to this thread, I mentioned 3 specific problems, by no means comprehensive. "Lol" is a pretty lame response.

As are your assumptions.

 

[Kenny'sID]

Read the NY Times. They have the proof. Trump and his family have tried to conceal their (beyond disgraceful) shafting of the American people by not supporting the US by paying their share of their taxes.

So you are certian they have the proof? Are you ever easy.

 

[pescador]

So you are certian they have the proof? Are you ever easy.

Because I believe the reporting of one of the great newspapers of the world? Who/what is your source of information?

 

[Kentonio]

And I repeat, the left had "evidence" on the collusion as well.

Oh, and I "read" their evidence, as did the courts and guess how it turned out.

But it's clear you refuse to get it so carry on with your opinions, and we'll just have to wait and see on the outcome.

What ‘court’?

 

[Kentonio]

It could also be nothing more sinister then Germany having more creditor friendly laws.

Potentially, but the reason the other banks wouldn’t lend to Trump is because he’s a horrendous credit risk. Why Deutschbank seem to think he’s a safe bet is a very big question. Which could potentially be answered when you read up on Alpha Bank and the guy who left there to work at the head of the Deuschbank department who approved the Trump loans.

 

[pescador]

President Donald Trump personally holds $421 million in debt and loans that are largely coming due in the next four years, The New York Times reported Sunday after obtaining more than two decades of his long-sought tax returns.

An ongoing audit by the Internal Revenue Service, meanwhile, could cost Trump more than $100 million.

 

[Kenny'sID]

Because I believe the reporting of one of the great newspapers of the world? Who/what is your source of information?

I dont need a source.
I'm not the one making baseless claims and assuming anyone I want to call great newspaper must be that.

You're gonna love CNN, just as the Post, they will tell you exactly what you want to hear, it's how they make their living off people.

 

[Arcangl86]

Potentially, but the reason the other banks wouldn’t lend to Trump is because he’s a horrendous credit risk. Why Deutschbank seem to think he’s a safe bet is a very big question. Which could potentially be answered when you read up on Alpha Bank and the guy who left there to work at the head of the Deuschbank department who approved the Trump loans.

They could think he's a huge credit risk. They could also think that they have a good chance of recovering all or most of what they are owed through the courts.

 

[essentialsaltes]

I want to make one of those 'sweating button choice' memes with "Trump's businesses are losing money" and "Trump is lying to the IRS about his businesses losing money". But probably both are true.

It'll be interesting to see what else the NYT reports. This alone doesn't seem to move the needle much. It confirms what we all suspected or already knew:

that his claims of financial success need to be taken with a grain of salt
that he has access to tax dodges most of us poor suckers don't
that some of his tax dodges are dodgy enough that the IRS has taken an interest
that none of his ardent supporters seemed to care when he said "That makes me smart" for not paying federal taxes like the rest of us suckers, and they certainly won't care now.

 

[pescador]

I dont need a source.
I'm not the one making baseless claims and assuming anyone I want to call great newspaper must be that.

You're gonna love CNN.

You don't need a source?? You just believe what you make up in your own head? Good luck with that!

 

[Kenny'sID]

What ‘court’?

Are you kidding me

Are you not aware there was a hearing on the collusion case?

 

[whatbogsends]

So is it hearsay or a leak?

It's obviously both. Someone leaked fake information. Whoever leaked that fake information needs to be prosecuted immediately.

 

[Kenny'sID]

You don't need a source?? You just believe what you make up in your own head? Good luck with that!

What did I make up?

 

[dqhall]

Deutsche Bank is the only bank that is willing to finance Donald after his multiple bankruptcies and history of stiffing creditors and defaulting on loans.

Trump went to a Russian oligarch loyal to Putin for funding after he defaulted on US bank loans and they did not want to loan him more money. He also went to Germany. China agreed to lend him money for an Indonesian resort complex. China later rescinded their offer.

 

[pescador]

What did I make up?

You tell us. You wrote "I dont need a source." So where besides your own imagination does your information come from?