New York City initiates the most severe ‘transgender rights’ enforcement in America

Gentle Lamb

"Let there be sheep!"
Site Supporter
Jul 18, 2009
1,615
1,331
✟272,616.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
This is not a law. This is a totalitarian regime.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...st-severe-transgender-rights-enforcement-in-a

OpinionGender, HomosexualityMon Jan 4, 2016 - 11:58 am EST

New York City initiates the most severe ‘transgender rights’ enforcement in America
discrimination , gender identity , massachusetts , new york city , transgender

New York, January 4, 2016 (MassResistance) -- This is where the radical “non-discrimination” laws are taking us, unless we stop them.

On Dec. 21, New York City’s Commission on Human Rights announced that it has re-interpreted the city’s transgender anti-discrimination law. The result is more radical and oppressive than we’ve seen so far in the U.S. It covers all people in the areas of employment, public accommodations (i.e., restaurants, theaters, stores, health clubs, etc), and housing. Included are fines of up to $250,000 for each violation.

MassResistance recently documented how the LGBT movement is working to leverage “transgender anti-discrimination” laws to force radical “gender indoctrination” on children in the nation’s public schools. As we observed, that’s only part of where this is headed.

The new "transgender non-discrimination" enforcement
The New York City Commission has released a 10-page manual stating specifically what it intends to enforce. Read the manual HERE.

Violations of the law in the City of New York now include:

Failing to use an individual’s preferred name or pronoun, such as calling a biological male “she” when requested. It’s also illegal to require proof of a legal name change or of "sex-change" medical procedures.

Restricting same-sex facilities, such as restrooms, locker rooms, and showers, to the persons of the biological sex. People’s “gender identity or expression” must be the indicator.

Limiting a person’s options to only “male” and “female.” How this works was not completely explained.

Sex stereotyping. If a company allows women to wear wigs, makeup, skirts, and jewelry – it must also allow men to do so. Any conversation about a person's non-conformity to gender norms is also prohibited.

Imposing different dress codes based on sex. Similar to sex stereotyping. For example, if a restaurant requires waitresses to wear skirts and high heels, it must also require male waiters do so. Or, it may not require only male patrons to wear ties. The Commission’s manual is very emphatic about this:

“Holding individuals to different grooming or uniform standards based on gender serves no legitimate non-discriminatory purpose and reinforces a culture of sex stereotypes and accepted cultural norms based on gender expression and identity.”

Transgender-inclusive health insurance. All employers must cover medical procedures for "transitioning" to the opposite sex and include other special “transgender” health care. The manual elaborates:

To be non-discriminatory with respect to gender, health benefit plans must cover transgender care, also known as transition-related care or gender-affirming care … Transgender care includes a range of treatments, including, for example, hormone replacement therapy, voice training, or surgery.

Treating cross-dressers differently in any way. Treating cross-dressers differently in the workplace or at a public accommodation, even in a minor way, is strictly illegal. Also, reacting negatively to a person’s demands that their “transgender rights” be enforced is also illegal.

Bizarre definitions. The manual includes legal definitions of terms, such as: Cisgender, Gender Identity, Gender Expression, Gender, Gender non-conforming, Intersex, Sex, Transgender. For example, "Gender Identity" is legally defined as

“. . . one’s internal deeply-held sense of one’s gender which may be the same or different from one’s sex assigned at birth. One’s gender identity may be male, female, neither or both, e.g., non-binary. Everyone has a gender identity. Gender identity is distinct from sexual orientation.”

Penalties. Violators can be fined up to $250,000 per violation. This can include employers, employees, and even members of the public at a public accommodation. In addition, the “victims” can be awarded “back and front pay, along with other compensatory and punitive damages.” Potential victims have one year to file a complaint with the Commission and three years to file with the court system.

Read the rest of the article here: https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...st-severe-transgender-rights-enforcement-in-a
 
  • Like
Reactions: brinny

Blondepudding

Who Sprinkled You With Grumpy Dust?
Dec 26, 2015
1,493
604
Here and now
✟19,720.00
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
I wonder if this is SCOTUS worthy?

I gotta remember NYC tried to make large cups of pop illegal. Is this really that far of a stretch? Fascism comes to the Island. Give it a minute and that'll be the name of a new reality series just timely enough to replace the long defunct, "harlots in the city". Or was that sex in the city? Ah, tomato tomato.
smiley-laughing004.gif
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Blondepudding

Who Sprinkled You With Grumpy Dust?
Dec 26, 2015
1,493
604
Here and now
✟19,720.00
Faith
Ignostic
Marital Status
Married
I think Bruce Transgenner gets too much attention, but I want to be considered a friend of the BLT community.

;)
Now imagine you'd said that at a job site in NYC. That's big money fineage there baby! ;) Think of all the BLT's you couldn't buy for the cost of speaking that freely in Manhattan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rick Otto
Upvote 0

Rick Otto

The Dude Abides
Nov 19, 2002
34,112
7,406
On The Prairie
✟29,593.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Now imagine you'd said that at a job site in NYC. That's big money fineage there baby! ;) Think of all the BLT's you couldn't buy for the cost of speaking that freely in Manhattan.
OK, you got me,... unless I have a mic at a comedy club on improv night!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Sistrin

We are such stuff as dreams are made on...
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2012
6,488
3,399
Location Location Location
✟197,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Laws prohibiting the harassment and mistreatment of trans* people? Good.

When the law is written to allow the "victim" to define what constitutes both harassment and mistreatment on a case by case basis, you do not create equality. You create oppression. As was discussed in the previous thread concerning this law, it was crafted to deny the Constitutional rights of one group to favor the rights of another. That should bother you, regardless of your personal views concerning the transgendered. But I won't hold my breath.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Better to just call a she, a she when she asks you to... I think..

Yes confusing. Why not just assign numbers and call people by that? Hopefully you don't get the number after 1!
 
Upvote 0

s_gunter

Contributor
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2003
8,541
963
Visit site
✟59,965.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Why are some Christians calling laws that "prohibit the harassment and mistreatment of trans people" totalitarian? Isn't mistreatment of people against Christianity?

Gal 3:28 (KJV) There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
 
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
This is not a law. This is a totalitarian regime.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...st-severe-transgender-rights-enforcement-in-a

OpinionGender, HomosexualityMon Jan 4, 2016 - 11:58 am EST

New York City initiates the most severe ‘transgender rights’ enforcement in America
discrimination , gender identity , massachusetts , new york city , transgender

New York, January 4, 2016 (MassResistance) -- This is where the radical “non-discrimination” laws are taking us, unless we stop them.

On Dec. 21, New York City’s Commission on Human Rights announced that it has re-interpreted the city’s transgender anti-discrimination law. The result is more radical and oppressive than we’ve seen so far in the U.S. It covers all people in the areas of employment, public accommodations (i.e., restaurants, theaters, stores, health clubs, etc), and housing. Included are fines of up to $250,000 for each violation.

MassResistance recently documented how the LGBT movement is working to leverage “transgender anti-discrimination” laws to force radical “gender indoctrination” on children in the nation’s public schools. As we observed, that’s only part of where this is headed.

The new "transgender non-discrimination" enforcement
The New York City Commission has released a 10-page manual stating specifically what it intends to enforce. Read the manual HERE.

Violations of the law in the City of New York now include:

Failing to use an individual’s preferred name or pronoun, such as calling a biological male “she” when requested. It’s also illegal to require proof of a legal name change or of "sex-change" medical procedures.

Restricting same-sex facilities, such as restrooms, locker rooms, and showers, to the persons of the biological sex. People’s “gender identity or expression” must be the indicator.

Limiting a person’s options to only “male” and “female.” How this works was not completely explained.

Sex stereotyping. If a company allows women to wear wigs, makeup, skirts, and jewelry – it must also allow men to do so. Any conversation about a person's non-conformity to gender norms is also prohibited.

Imposing different dress codes based on sex. Similar to sex stereotyping. For example, if a restaurant requires waitresses to wear skirts and high heels, it must also require male waiters do so. Or, it may not require only male patrons to wear ties. The Commission’s manual is very emphatic about this:

“Holding individuals to different grooming or uniform standards based on gender serves no legitimate non-discriminatory purpose and reinforces a culture of sex stereotypes and accepted cultural norms based on gender expression and identity.”

Transgender-inclusive health insurance. All employers must cover medical procedures for "transitioning" to the opposite sex and include other special “transgender” health care. The manual elaborates:

To be non-discriminatory with respect to gender, health benefit plans must cover transgender care, also known as transition-related care or gender-affirming care … Transgender care includes a range of treatments, including, for example, hormone replacement therapy, voice training, or surgery.

Treating cross-dressers differently in any way. Treating cross-dressers differently in the workplace or at a public accommodation, even in a minor way, is strictly illegal. Also, reacting negatively to a person’s demands that their “transgender rights” be enforced is also illegal.

Bizarre definitions. The manual includes legal definitions of terms, such as: Cisgender, Gender Identity, Gender Expression, Gender, Gender non-conforming, Intersex, Sex, Transgender. For example, "Gender Identity" is legally defined as

“. . . one’s internal deeply-held sense of one’s gender which may be the same or different from one’s sex assigned at birth. One’s gender identity may be male, female, neither or both, e.g., non-binary. Everyone has a gender identity. Gender identity is distinct from sexual orientation.”

Penalties. Violators can be fined up to $250,000 per violation. This can include employers, employees, and even members of the public at a public accommodation. In addition, the “victims” can be awarded “back and front pay, along with other compensatory and punitive damages.” Potential victims have one year to file a complaint with the Commission and three years to file with the court system.

Read the rest of the article here: https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinio...st-severe-transgender-rights-enforcement-in-a
Totalitarian regime?

Seriously, just treat everyone respectfully and as an equal. End of problem.
 
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Yes confusing. Why not just assign numbers and call people by that? Hopefully you don't get the number after 1!
Why is the concept of calling someone what they want to be called so confronting and upsetting to some people?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

KitKatMatt

stupid bleeding heart feminist liberal
May 2, 2013
5,818
1,602
✟29,520.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Why is the concept of calling someone what they want to be called so confronting and upsetting to some people?

Because I know better than them! I know what they should be called! It should all be up to ME.

:tantrum:
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,116
34,054
Texas
✟176,076.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why is the concept of calling someone what they want to be called so confronting and upsetting to some people?

It's not. That is why using employee numbers is the way to go. This way if someone accidently mixes up a person by their number there is no perceived discrimination. Unless the state then makes laws protecting odd numbers over even or something like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Siggy
Upvote 0

CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN

My dad died 1/12/2023. I'm still devastated.
Jul 1, 2007
17,281
5,056
Native Land
✟331,271.00
Country
United States
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Why are some Christians calling laws that "prohibit the harassment and mistreatment of trans people" totalitarian? Isn't mistreatment of people against Christianity?

Gal 3:28 (KJV) There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Not if your gay, lesbian, bi sexual or transgender I guess.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Sistrin

We are such stuff as dreams are made on...
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2012
6,488
3,399
Location Location Location
✟197,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0