New White House personnel chief tells Cabinet liaisons to target Never Trumpers

[TLK Valentine]

From the "This is how a 'fight to the death' ends when you lose", files: New White House personnel chief tells Cabinet liaisons to target Never Trumpers

Johnny McEntee called in White House liaisons from cabinet agencies for an introductory meeting Thursday, in which he asked them to identify political appointees across the U.S. government who are believed to be anti-Trump, three sources familiar with the meeting tell Axios.
...
Trump has empowered McEntee — whom he considers an absolute loyalist — to purge the “bad people” and “Deep State.”​

Is it safe to assume that anyone who denies, disagrees, or defies Donald will be considered a bad person from the Deep State and be subsequently purged?

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

Is it safe to assume that anyone who denies, disagrees, or defies Donald will be considered a bad person from the Deep State and be subsequently purged?

If you can't work for Donald Trump, wouldn't the honorable thing to do be to simply resign?

 

[TLK Valentine]

If you can't work for Donald Trump, wouldn't the honorable thing to do be to simply resign?

What if you'd rather work for America?

 

[Kenny'sID]

Is it safe to assume that anyone who denies, disagrees, or defies Donald will be considered a bad person from the Deep State and be subsequently purged?

Much like anyone who didn't get their way in 2016 is going to consider Trump a bad person. And the Dems worked hard for the title of "Bad person" while Trump was busy putting the country back into shape.

I say get rid of those who have not only not pulled their weight, but have done nothing but work against those who have...it only makes sense. I mean, if he's smart, and he is, why would he not do that?

 

[Pommer]

Much like anyone who didn't get their way in 2016 is going to consider Trump a bad person. And the Dems worked hard for the title of "Bad person" while Trump was busy putting the country back into shape.

I say get rid of those who have not only not pulled their weight, but have done nothing but work against whose who have...it only makes sense. I mean, if he's smart, and he is, why would he not do that?

Would it be a “bad thing” to desire (and announce) a goal of making a current first term President a “one-term President”?

 

[Kenny'sID]

Would it be a “bad thing” to desire (and announce) a goal of making a current first term President a “one-term President”?

Already done, and has been going on since the election...good luck on that one.

Bad thing? sure, and you see what it's now getting them.

 

[Speedwell]

Already done, and has been going on since the election...good luck on that one.

Bad thing? sure, and you see what it's now getting them.

You've forgotten McConnell's speech, I see. Oh well, irony is wasted on ideologues.

 

[Kenny'sID]

You've forgotten McConnell's speech, I see. Oh well, irony is wasted on ideologues.

Explain how that makes me wrong?

 

[TLK Valentine]

Much like anyone who didn't get their way in 2016 is going to consider Trump a bad person. And the Dems worked hard for the title of "Bad person" while Trump was busy putting the country back into shape.

"Back into shape"? What was wrong with it pre-Donald?

 

[iluvatar5150]

Who was it that said, "If you aren't for me you are against me"?

Because Trump is Jesus?

 

[Belk]

[

Not really we are talking about perhaps firing but not firing squads. Those will have to wait for when the socialists to take over.

Do tell

From the "This is how a 'fight to the death' ends when you lose", files:

 

[Belk]

Who was it that said, "If you aren't for me you are against me"?

Comparing Trump to God again?

 

[Kenny'sID]

"Back into shape"? What was wrong with it pre-Donald?

You are saying Trump has done nothing the make the USA better?

Because Trump is Jesus?

Of course not, but because Jesus was wise too.

 

[Kenny'sID]

Comparing Trump to God again?

That's twice now, with the low level assumption.

 

[Belk]

That's twice now, with the low level assumption.

It's almost like you are trying to deny what demonstrably happened.

 

[TLK Valentine]

You are saying Trump has done nothing the make the USA better?

No, but you are implying that the US was somehow "out of shape" before Donald.

I'm simply requesting a bit of clarification.

 

[TLK Valentine]

It's almost like you are trying to deny what demonstrably happened.

The Party told you to reject the evidence of your own eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

 

[Tom 1]

I imagine this guy will be next in line for another Trump smear campaign:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...wp_main&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

What if you'd rather work for America?

America elected Donald Trump.

 

[jgarden]

From the "This is how a 'fight to the death' ends when you lose", files: New White House personnel chief tells Cabinet liaisons to target Never Trumpers

Johnny McEntee called in White House liaisons from cabinet agencies for an introductory meeting Thursday, in which he asked them to identify political appointees across the U.S. government who are believed to be anti-Trump, three sources familiar with the meeting tell Axios.
...
Trump has empowered McEntee — whom he considers an absolute loyalist — to purge the “bad people” and “Deep State.”​

Given that all these "bad people" are already Trump political appointees, what does this say about his promise to attract only the "best people" after more than 3 years into his term?

As demonstrated by the lack of qualifications of the 3rd Director of National Intelligence in the past 3 years, the "best people" refuse to serve in this Administration because they simply won't tolerate this President's abusive behavior and constant interference/criticism - as recently stated by his 3rd Attorney General in 3 years!

"The best people" are always in demand in both the private and public sector, so when they see how Trump disposes of career civil servants, why would they demean themselves by working for a President whom they neither trust nor respect?