- Mar 12, 2007
- 4,202
- 518
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- AU-Labor
It seems that politicians find secularism more appealing than traditional thinking, so if possible to remove religion from orderly problem solving as ideal. And this in government and then through the educations system. Like enforcing a new wave of culture, condescending against Christians and religious. They see religion as antiquated and inferior philosophy. Religous can examine themselves and revise...
It seems many young people think the secular century was really not at peace because of the supposed religiously motivated wars, WW1 and WW2 and the cold war.
Atheists and maybe agnostics take up secularism. And when they turn away from church and such, they seem to find Neo Nazi or Communist ideas attractive. Abortion, euthanasia, eugenics, banning the Bible or defaming it. Banning prayer and preaching. Social equality, now other equality.
It seems the secularists may want to end free speech. Thus creating a condescending crush of the will of the majority, or in some places even a small minority, which is not democratic.
I am against the possible western dictatorship of secularists. I don't like their lack of morals and their sense of superiority and condescension to force change society and perhaps silence opposition parties and other democratic powers.
I think among religious, especially Christians that the best and brightest philosophies are to be found, with the best good will, and respect of human rights and freedoms.
The press focuses on squabbles, people who do not want to bake cakes for conscience and people who want to use the other gender toilets and such nonsense. Politicians secular or religious can solve these disputes with sound policies, rather than take sides.
It seems many young people think the secular century was really not at peace because of the supposed religiously motivated wars, WW1 and WW2 and the cold war.
Atheists and maybe agnostics take up secularism. And when they turn away from church and such, they seem to find Neo Nazi or Communist ideas attractive. Abortion, euthanasia, eugenics, banning the Bible or defaming it. Banning prayer and preaching. Social equality, now other equality.
It seems the secularists may want to end free speech. Thus creating a condescending crush of the will of the majority, or in some places even a small minority, which is not democratic.
I am against the possible western dictatorship of secularists. I don't like their lack of morals and their sense of superiority and condescension to force change society and perhaps silence opposition parties and other democratic powers.
I think among religious, especially Christians that the best and brightest philosophies are to be found, with the best good will, and respect of human rights and freedoms.
The press focuses on squabbles, people who do not want to bake cakes for conscience and people who want to use the other gender toilets and such nonsense. Politicians secular or religious can solve these disputes with sound policies, rather than take sides.