Pseudo Science or Secular Science, is not open to debate with anyone. Because it has no proof to support it's theories, so how can you argue with someone's wild imagination, where anything goes and that are no rules or facts involves. Just pure speculation.There really is no point in having Biologists debating theologians, these are two very different subject matters.
You'd be better off having a Theology debate with believers that accept evolution and believers that don't accept evolution as at least that has something in common. They can argue over whether theology is consistent or inconsistent with evidence based science.
Of course scientists can try to debunk ToE if they think they have evidence of such, they can put together papers, get them peer reviewed and published. That is the way science works and progresses.
The other problem with Pseudo Science/Secular Science is, they don't allow any critical thinking or questions. Because the whole thing is based on subjective circular reasoning, where they force you to accept their premises and then remain within it's boundaries. So it relies on cohesion and it uses bullying tactics to stop anyone from challenging it.
The entire hoax collapses like a house of cards when you pull the subjective circular reasoning rug out from under it. ToE is not founded on facts, and it can't stand on it's own merit, so you are forced to swallow the kool aid before you ask any questions.
Upvote
0