Need a new tag added in the Eschatology forum

[Douggg]

There is a need for a new tag added in the Eschatology Forum of "non-replacement theology".

I am not saying that people should not be allowed to hold whatever views they want. I am saying the threads in the Eschatology forum are getting get bogged down and diverted because of the polarity is too severe. And that it should be a thread tag option to say "non- replacement theology".

There was a similar action taken about 4 or 5 years ago because partial preterists were diverting all the threads, such that the topics became preterists versus non-preterists. So the tag system was setup.

We now have a similar situation in the promotion of (so-called) "new covenant" theology. Which a core element of it is replacement theology.

 

[Mark Quayle]

There is a need for a new tag added in the Eschatology Forum of "non-replacement theology".

I am not saying that people should not be allowed to hold whatever views they want. I am saying the threads in the Eschatology forum are getting get bogged down and diverted because of the polarity is too severe. And that it should be a thread tag option to say "non- replacement theology".

There was a similar action taken about 4 or 5 years ago because partial preterists were diverting all the threads, such that the topics became preterists versus non-preterists. So the tag system was setup.

We now have a similar situation in the promotion of (so-called) "new covenant" theology. Which a core element of it is replacement theology.

You may be right. There has only ever been one Gospel.

 

[Lulav]

I will ask our Policy Manager to take a look at this for you

@Sojourner1

 

[BABerean2]

I will ask our Policy Manager to take a look at this for you

@Sojourner1

It is ironic that many of those crying "Replacement Theology" have replaced the one seed(Christ), with the many seeds in Galatians 3:16.

They have replaced the children of the promise, with the children of the flesh in Romans 9:6-8.

They have replaced the "son" who is the "heir" to the land in Matthew chapter 21, with those who rejected Him as the "chief cornerstone".

They ignore what the Apostle Paul said about genealogies in Titus 3:9.
They pretend that a man or woman's relationship to God is now based on who their parents would be, by ignoring 1 John 2:22-23.

When Peter addressed the crowd as "all the house of Israel" on the Day of Pentecost, who was he talking to?
When the Church began on that day it was made up almost entirely of Israelites who had accepted the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and found fulfilled in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24.

The Church has not replaced Israel.
We find the ultimate fulfillment of Israel in Matthew 1:1.
How can anyone deny that Jesus Christ is the ultimate fulfillment of Israel, based on Luke 24:25-27?


The member (Doug) who is asking for this change is attempting to promote his doctrine by putting the label of "Replacement Theology" on those who disagree with him.

.

 

[Dave L]

There is a need for a new tag added in the Eschatology Forum of "non-replacement theology".

I am not saying that people should not be allowed to hold whatever views they want. I am saying the threads in the Eschatology forum are getting get bogged down and diverted because of the polarity is too severe. And that it should be a thread tag option to say "non- replacement theology".

There was a similar action taken about 4 or 5 years ago because partial preterists were diverting all the threads, such that the topics became preterists versus non-preterists. So the tag system was setup.

We now have a similar situation in the promotion of (so-called) "new covenant" theology. Which a core element of it is replacement theology.

That is nothing more than hiding from the truth.

 

[Handmaid for Jesus]

There is a need for a new tag added in the Eschatology Forum of "non-replacement theology".

I am not saying that people should not be allowed to hold whatever views they want. I am saying the threads in the Eschatology forum are getting get bogged down and diverted because of the polarity is too severe. And that it should be a thread tag option to say "non- replacement theology".

There was a similar action taken about 4 or 5 years ago because partial preterists were diverting all the threads, such that the topics became preterists versus non-preterists. So the tag system was setup.

We now have a similar situation in the promotion of (so-called) "new covenant" theology. Which a core element of it is replacement theology.

The problem I see in the eschatology forum is there are full preterists there posing as partial preterists. They hijack threads, make circular arguments, and troll threads that they do not like the subject instead of just leaving those threads alone. They get popular threads closed down. It is very frustrating. I agree that something needs to be done about this.

 

[Handmaid for Jesus]

That is nothing more than hiding from the truth.

You mean YOUR TRUTH.

 

[Dave L]

You mean YOUR TRUTH.

People hide from the truth behind forum restrictions imposed on certain groups. They end like up the choir preaching to the choir.

 

[Handmaid for Jesus]

The member (Doug) who is asking for this change is attempting to promote his doctrine by putting the label of "Replacement Theology" on those who disagree with him.

For the record, I agree with the member Douggg.

 

[BABerean2]

The problem I see in the eschatology forum is there are full preterists there posing as partial preterists.

Are you saying that all of those opposed to modern Dispensational Theology are Full-Preterists?

Or is that a separate problem?

.

 

[Handmaid for Jesus]

Are you saying that all of those opposed to modern Dispensational Theology are Full-Preterists?

Or is that a separate problem?

.

n
No we are not complaining about dispensationalism, that is a separate issue.

 

[Rigatoni]

If it would help reduce the polarity in future threads, then I would also greatly support this new tag as well. An eschatology thread I've enjoyed posting in frequency was recently locked, due to trolling from a known preterist. It's very frustrating.

 

[alsughasoughaiuyfygh]

.

 

[BABerean2]

Yes, I support this new tag as Anthony7 has already stated.

Honestly, I think this forum would benefit if the Eschatology forums were split up into Pre-Trib, Post-Trib, Preterist, etc. because I know that all I see in the forum is competition instead of thoughtful discussion of certain views.

All of the following tags are already available now on the posts of the eschatology forum.

• • Futurist Only
  • Partial Preterist Only
  • Historicist Only
  • Idealist Only
  • Pre-Mil Only
  • Post-Mil Only
  • A-Mil Only
  • Pre-Trib Only
  • Mid-Trib Only
  • Post-Trib Only
  • Anti-Christ European
  • Anti-Christ Muslim
• (No prefix)

.

 

[Dave-W]

Yes, I support this new tag as Anthony7 has already stated.

Honestly, I think this forum would benefit if the Eschatology forums were split up into Pre-Trib, Post-Trib, Preterist, etc. because I know that all I see in the forum is competition instead of thoughtful discussion of certain views.

YEEEEAAAAAHHHHH. That is the main reason I usually steer clear of that forum.

Pre-mils. Post-mils. A-mils. Wind mills. It all just goes around in circles to me.

 

[Douggg]

I will ask our Policy Manager to take a look at this for you

@Sojourner1

Has any progress been made in suggesting the new tag?

For example: my post #69

President Trump Recognizes the Golan Heights as Israeli Territory

 

[BABerean2]

Has any progress been made in suggesting the new tag?

For example: my post #69

President Trump Recognizes the Golan Heights as Israeli Territory

The new tag should say...

"Agrees with Douggg, Only"


.

 

[Douggg]

I will ask our Policy Manager to take a look at this for you

@Sojourner1

Has any progress been made?