Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It´s AV´s logic. What can I do?Huh? What in the world does this mean?
I can turn into an eagle and soar majestically above the clouds. But I can only transform when no one is looking. What's that you say? You want evidence for this claim? Well, to be honest, I have no evidence because there can't be evidence for women turning into eagles - so the absence of evidence for it is evidence for it.
I now conclude you are convinced that I can turn into an eagle.
Well, when we observe where apples come from we have evidence where apples come from. That´s the most direct way of constituting "evidence".Since you want to go the ad-hominem route..... what was stupid was not being able to comprehend that making them understand apples can only come from pre-existing apples and that evolutionists also rely on absent evidence - since none have been observed to come from any other source, leads to the support of your answer.
But just like Luke's genealogy, you should conclude the first apples came from God.Well, when we observe where apples come from we have evidence where apples come from.
If the Bible were correct we would see evidence of this in the fossil record. And in the way the world was. We would see all sorts of different things that would lead us to the conclusion that it was created. Then we'd be teaching that in schools.But just like Luke's genealogy, you should conclude the first apples came from God.
Luke 3:38 Which was the son of Enos, which was the son of Seth, which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God.
Genesis 1:11 And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
12 And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind, and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
13 And the evening and the morning were the third day.
1. If God created an apple ex nihilo, what evidence would you give your friend He did this?
2. Can God create a dress tomorrow so old it falls apart with age?
If god created grape juice using lemons from ex nihilo, would it constitute wine, since raisins are simply wasted grapes?3. If God created a loaf of raisin bread ex materia, would it constitute deception, since raisins are dried grapes?
I can't believe you would expect to find evidence of the very first apples in the fossil record.If the Bible were correct we would see evidence of this in the fossil record.
4:3. If god created grape juice using lemons from ex nihilo, would it constitute wine, since raisins are simply wasted grapes?
An apple created this second could be blue, squirt lemon juice, and have GROWN IN CALIFORNIA on it.
To me there are an open admission by AV that he is wrong . . . again.Can you stop posting these challenge threads?
One year after asking me to stop posting challenge threads he's gone (unless he's here under another name).To me there are an open admission by AV that he is wrong . . . again.
Maybe he had to visit a doctor?You were gone for a long while too. Taking a break or the banhammer?
Took a break on my own volition.You were gone for a long while too. Taking a break or the banhammer?
One year after asking me to stop posting challenge threads he's gone (unless he's here under another name).
I'm glad I didn't oblige him.
Maybe because you enjoy the absurdity of his challenge relative to his pretend position?Honestly, I kind of like your challenge threads.
I suspect a fair percentage of them are done for smart-alekery, but there's always a feeling of good-naturedness about them.
Why, thank you, Kylie!Honestly, I kind of like your challenge threads.
I suspect a fair percentage of them are done for smart-alekery, but there's always a feeling of good-naturedness about them.
"Pretend position"???Maybe because you enjoy the absurdity of his challenge relative to his pretend position?
Yes Alfred: Without a winking smiley or other blatant display of humor, it is utterly impossible to parody a Creationist in such a way that someone won't mistake for the genuine article."Pretend position"???
Maybe because you enjoy the absurdity of his challenge relative to his pretend position?
Why, thank you, Kylie!
I like to think I have a sense of humor from time to time!
Me too. It is so handy when you admit that you are wrong in the title.One year after asking me to stop posting challenge threads he's gone (unless he's here under another name).
I'm glad I didn't oblige him.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?