My Pumice Challenge

[EternalDragon]

Dates are not assumptions. I see everyone correcting you on the misuse of this word. Why do you keep making the same mistakes over and over again?

Then give me the exact measurement of the isotopes around 3.5 billion years ago. Not a backwards counting down. An actual measurement. If you can't, it's an assumption.

I am making no mistakes.

 

[Dizredux]

Then give me the exact measurement of the isotopes around 3.5 billion years ago. Not a backwards counting down. An actual measurement. If you can't, it's an assumption.

I am making no mistakes.

I think I have figured out ED's definition of assumption, it is all things he does not agree with or doesn't want to believe.

Dizredux

 

[pgp_protector]

I think I have figured out ED's definition of assumption, it is all things he does not agree with or doesn't want to believe.

Dizredux

Is that an assumption?

 

[EternalDragon]

I think I have figured out ED's definition of assumption, it is all things he does not agree with or doesn't want to believe.

Dizredux

How can I disagree with something that is not even a fact?

Wait, yes, you are correct. I prefer to believe God's word and not man's
assumptions of the evidence which are touted as "science fact".

 

[Dizredux]

How can I disagree with something that is not even a fact?

Wait, yes, you are correct. I prefer to believe God's word and not man's
assumptions of the evidence which are touted as "science fact".

Again what do you mean by the term "assumption"?

Dizredux

 

[Dizredux]

Is that an assumption?

No, a reasonable guess. Since he won't let us know what he means by "assumption", that is about all I can do.

Dizredux

 

[Subduction Zone]

I think I have figured out ED's definition of assumption, it is all things he does not agree with or doesn't want to believe.

Dizredux

Possibly. I think it is everything that E.D. cannot understand.

Sadly E.D. still does not know what an assumption is.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Why don't we establish if He can first,* before we try and establish why, scientist?

* Without being accused of deception by the clipboard clique, that is.

We can't establish if a deity even exists, so how do you expect us to establish what a possibly nonexistent entity can do?

 

[AV1611VET]

The real question should be, "Why did he manufacture pumice in the first place."

Why don't we establish if He can first,* before we try and establish why, scientist?

* Without being accused of deception by the clipboard clique, that is.

We can't establish if a deity even exists, so how do you expect us to establish what a possibly nonexistent entity can do?

Then why ask, "why"?

 

[AirPo]

Really? I thought you would have a better response. Like in actual evidence.

Really? I thought you would have a better response. Like in actual evidence.

 

[AirPo]

Then why ask, "why"?

It's all part of the silly game you created.

 

[Split Rock]

How can I disagree with something that is not even a fact?

Wait, yes, you are correct. I prefer to believe God's word and not man's
assumptions of the evidence which are touted as "science fact".

You have no problems with "man's assumptions" about God's word, though (especially when that man is you).. do you?

 

[AV1611VET]

It's all part of the silly game you created.

Right.

The alternative is to sit and listen to how God is so "deceptive," isn't it?

Rather than challenge these "educated" boys with challenges that [should] show that even creating an apple, raisin bread, or pumice would confuse them -- and pray they see the error of their hasty assessment of God -- I should just consider all this a silly game; shouldn't I?

(It ain't gonna happen.)

 

[AirPo]

Right.

The alternative is to sit and listen to how God is so "deceptive," isn't it?

Nope

Rather than challenge these "educated" boys with challenges that [should] show that even creating an apple, raisin bread, or pumice would confuse them -- and pray they see the error of their hasty assessment of God -- I should just consider all this a silly game; shouldn't I?

(It ain't gonna happen.)

Your no win scenarios are not a challenge.

 

[AV1611VET]

Nope



Your no win scenarios are not a challenge.

I know.

You guys aren't here to understand -- you're here to ridicule.

 

[AirPo]

I know.

You guys aren't here to understand

Neither are you.

 

[[serious]]

I know.

You guys aren't here to understand -- you're here to ridicule.

I'm still waiting for the next step.

1. You asked if pumice can be created ex nihilo without deception.
2. I said no, it can't (well at least i can't think of a way for it to be).

What's the next move?

 

[AV1611VET]

Neither are you.

I admit it though.

 

[AirPo]

I admit it though.

Then it's not really your place to say others are here for.

 

[Loudmouth]

Can God create pumice ex nihilo tomorrow without deception?

Would God create the pumice so that the K/Ar, U/Pb, and Rb/Sr ratios all produced the same radiometric date?