Musk releases Twitter internal documents showing details of suppression of Hunter Biden laptop story

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[essentialsaltes]

View attachment 324524

Off topic. None of this is about the Hunter Biden laptop story.

 

[HARK!]

Off topic. None of this is about the Hunter Biden laptop story.

I'm the OP. I decide what is off topic.

All internal topics released by Musk are on topic here.

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[HARK!]

 

[KCfromNC]

I'd be really curious to see if anyone can piece together a coherent story from all of these out of context quotes. Because it sure reads like a firehose of vague innuendo, nothing really convincing unless one already starts with a misunderstanding about how social media works in the first place.

 

[Don't Panic]

What I am wondering is what Hark even thinks the problem is, these posts just look like what I assume happens in the background at CF's moderation meetings and any other online chat room that cares about it's product.

 

[Semper-Fi]

In 2018, two representatives stated, “We do not shadow ban … and we
certainly don’t shadow ban based on political viewpoints or ideology.”

Yet the “Twitter Files” show that such statements were outright lies.

 

[Say it aint so]

I have a problem with a government influencing elections, by coercing private companies to sensor the Press, banning their political opponents, and censoring free speech of the people.

So where's that outrage since the first batch of Taibbi tweets noted the White house (aka the government) interfered with what you call censoring free speech? Or are you just as disinterested as Taibbi himself with his causual mention before he publishes links of Hunters junk and drug use?

 

[HARK!]

So where's that outrage since the first batch of Taibbi tweets noted the White house (aka the government) interfered with what you call censoring free speech? Or are you just as disinterested as Taibbi himself with his causual mention before he publishes links of Hunters junk and drug use?

I don't understand what you are asking. Perhaps if you rephrase the question.

 

[Say it aint so]

I don't understand what you are asking. Perhaps if you rephrase the question.

You made a claim of government intervention of twitter. The only time that is noted in this "twitter file" is when it was done by Trump White house.
I personally find it odd this "journalist" has no interest in investigating what apparently is government intervention of free speech. That is the story here, and not the internal debate of the NYpost Hunter story that was supressed for exaclty three hot days at twitter. A story that no other news org chose to print including FOX, The WSJ, CNN, etc, simply because it could not be authenticated, and the harddrive not allowed to be examined by those media outlets. I just dont understand the hubbub.