I am a Christian guy who has basically deals with Revelation and Daniel. I also play a lot of chess, so I have a somewhat different way off looking at things like this and I must say her story is starting to fall apart. We think we have figured out where her timeline comes from and why her lawyers wanted her to go last.
We think part of her testimony was constructed based on Mark Judges book "Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk", I started thinking when I saw that the Washington Post stated that his book proves her timeline that something nefarious was going on. I says to me-self, they have reverse engineered this story and if so I should be able to prove it, my Chess buddies were like, let's do this.
I am positive they did this, so I start combing the net and then I see that Mark Judge says in his book that he only worked at Safeway for 2 weeks during the summer of 1982 (that gives her and her lawyers a reference/starting point). Her and her lawyers then take the Kavanaugh Calendars (remember they wanted him to go first) which were shown on TV a few days before the hearing, and they thus match her tale where it fits a day on the calendar.
What gives her away is what she said under oath (LOL if we got her, I know the FBI will too). She stated that all you had to do was look at when Mark Judge worked at Safeway, and then look back 6-8 weeks and you would have the date this event happened on. BOOM GUILTY AS A BLUE TICK HOUND !! You catch it yet ? How would she have any clue as per how long he worked at Safeway ? I mean what if he worked there 6 months or a year, how would she know he didn't work there an extended period of time ? Her and her Lawyers read his book that's how. Mark Judge in his book states he only worked there for 2 Weeks, that is why she has a 2 week gap in the timeline in which we need to look back (LOL). She said under oath, they need to look back 6-8 weeks to find out when the event occured, in other words, IN ERROR they/she gave it away, he worked at Safeway for 2 weeks, hence if you look back 6-8 weeks you will find a certain date on someone's calendar that has all the names I mentioned (WINK WINK) but of course she didn't say it was on the calendar, she just said IT HAPPENED 6-8 Weeks before he worked at Safeway, as if she knew it was July 1 and as if she knew he worked at Safeway 6-8 weeks later. He worked there for 2 weeks so from the time he started (July 1 to Middle August) was 6 Weeks to when he quit working there was 8 weeks. This is too funny.
If the date on the calendar had of been June 1 instead of July 1 she would have said it happened about 10-12 weeks before she saw Mark Judge in Safeway !! Her and her Lawyers reverse engineered the whole thing, they fabricated the story. I doubt they would have even showed up, but then they saw his calendar and those names scribbled on there on July 1. Her crafty lawyers are behind the whole thing, they led everyone to believe she was afraid of flying or either she lied under oath. They were stalling for time to craft a lie.
There are many other inconsistencies, I mean why would Mark Judge turn "WHITE" when she said hi to him in 1982 ? No police force in those days would have EVER charged a 17 year old guy for what she described, and it wasn't even him that supposedly did it. The Maryland municipality has already stated that what she described as per 1982 was a misdemeanor, thus the Statutes of Limitations was only ONE YEAR. That was a total fabrication, no guy anywhere in 1982, would have been worried about being charged, and we all know it, she's fabricated the whole thing, she's an SJW.
We think part of her testimony was constructed based on Mark Judges book "Wasted: Tales of a Gen X Drunk", I started thinking when I saw that the Washington Post stated that his book proves her timeline that something nefarious was going on. I says to me-self, they have reverse engineered this story and if so I should be able to prove it, my Chess buddies were like, let's do this.
I am positive they did this, so I start combing the net and then I see that Mark Judge says in his book that he only worked at Safeway for 2 weeks during the summer of 1982 (that gives her and her lawyers a reference/starting point). Her and her lawyers then take the Kavanaugh Calendars (remember they wanted him to go first) which were shown on TV a few days before the hearing, and they thus match her tale where it fits a day on the calendar.
What gives her away is what she said under oath (LOL if we got her, I know the FBI will too). She stated that all you had to do was look at when Mark Judge worked at Safeway, and then look back 6-8 weeks and you would have the date this event happened on. BOOM GUILTY AS A BLUE TICK HOUND !! You catch it yet ? How would she have any clue as per how long he worked at Safeway ? I mean what if he worked there 6 months or a year, how would she know he didn't work there an extended period of time ? Her and her Lawyers read his book that's how. Mark Judge in his book states he only worked there for 2 Weeks, that is why she has a 2 week gap in the timeline in which we need to look back (LOL). She said under oath, they need to look back 6-8 weeks to find out when the event occured, in other words, IN ERROR they/she gave it away, he worked at Safeway for 2 weeks, hence if you look back 6-8 weeks you will find a certain date on someone's calendar that has all the names I mentioned (WINK WINK) but of course she didn't say it was on the calendar, she just said IT HAPPENED 6-8 Weeks before he worked at Safeway, as if she knew it was July 1 and as if she knew he worked at Safeway 6-8 weeks later. He worked there for 2 weeks so from the time he started (July 1 to Middle August) was 6 Weeks to when he quit working there was 8 weeks. This is too funny.
If the date on the calendar had of been June 1 instead of July 1 she would have said it happened about 10-12 weeks before she saw Mark Judge in Safeway !! Her and her Lawyers reverse engineered the whole thing, they fabricated the story. I doubt they would have even showed up, but then they saw his calendar and those names scribbled on there on July 1. Her crafty lawyers are behind the whole thing, they led everyone to believe she was afraid of flying or either she lied under oath. They were stalling for time to craft a lie.
There are many other inconsistencies, I mean why would Mark Judge turn "WHITE" when she said hi to him in 1982 ? No police force in those days would have EVER charged a 17 year old guy for what she described, and it wasn't even him that supposedly did it. The Maryland municipality has already stated that what she described as per 1982 was a misdemeanor, thus the Statutes of Limitations was only ONE YEAR. That was a total fabrication, no guy anywhere in 1982, would have been worried about being charged, and we all know it, she's fabricated the whole thing, she's an SJW.
Last edited:
