More YouTube Biased Censorship

[KarateCowboy]

. STDs and AIDS were caused by promiscuous behavior not by simply being gay. The mainstream scientific community disagrees with your doctor Lisa . There a genetic and fetal environmental component to being gay .. in other words it’s a natural phenomenon and not a choice.

Yeah the STDS were caused by the promiscuity that is virtually synonymous with the queer lifestyle.

As for your assessment.... no, that's just false. Dr. Lisa Diamond represents the mainstream scientific community, being the author of it's handbook on human sexuality.

There is no "Gay Gene". The 1980's called. They want their debunked talking point back

 

[KarateCowboy]

. America has NEVER been a Christian country . I don’t know why people keep telling that ignorant nonsense as if it were true. We are forbidden to have a state religion and the founding fathers put that in place because they very specifically did not want sectarian hatreds to run the government. America has a majority Christian population but is not a theocracy by a long shot

You need to learn the difference between state, nation, and nation-state. basic civics.

Also, several states actually had state churches, and it was completely Constitutional. Go study some fifth grade history.

 

[Brightmoon]

Yeah the STDS were caused by the promiscuity that is virtually synonymous with the queer lifestyle.

As for your assessment.... no, that's just false. Dr. Lisa Diamond represents the mainstream scientific community, being the author of it's handbook on human sexuality.

There is no "Gay Gene". The 1980's called. They want their debunked talking point back

no one said anything about a gay gene . I meant that being homosexual was under the control of the genes and also due to environmental causes during fetal development. The interplay between the environment and the genes is the cause . It’s not just due to a single gene and it’s still not under the control of an individual.

And as far as homosexuals being promiscuous. That’s a stereotype and it’s unfair . Some are and some aren’t. The ones who wanted stable relationships wanted to get married which was only very recently made legal in America. But fundies want to tar them with that promiscuous label so they object to them wanting stable unions . Personally I think that it silly to complain about anyone wanting a stable relationship

 

[Brightmoon]

You need to learn the difference between state, nation, and nation-state. basic civics.

Also, several states actually had state churches, and it was completely Constitutional. Go study some fifth grade history.

I do actually remember my 5 th grade history.

And this is Thomas Jefferson’s letter to John Adams

 

[KarateCowboy]

I do actually remember my 5 th grade history.

Can you elucidate the difference between a state, nation, and nation-state?

Also, the Treaty of Tripoli, which we broke and invalidated, is not in any sense a national culture or tenet.

 

[steve78]

It still amazes me that there are those professing Christians supporting the idea that hate is itself somehow anti-biblical or wrong. There are so many things God hates. Once "hate" is allowed to be redefined, as Christians are currently doing unfortunately, it can and is easily used by those on the Left to support their anti-biblical worldview.

God does not hate.

Do you hate your children if they do something wrong or you disprove of.

 

[Shiloh Raven]

God does not hate.

Do you hate your children if they do something wrong or you disprove of.

God does hate. In fact, Proverbs 6:16-19 tells us seven things that God hates: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked schemes, feet that are quick to rush into evil, a false witness who pours out lies, and a man who stirs up dissension among brothers.

 

[tampasteve]

MOD HAT ON
​

Several Off Topic posts as well as posts that violate the "Inflammatory Word" rules have been removed. Please review the below:

"Examples of inflammatory words/phrases (including but not limited to): teahadist, Obamabot, Obamatron, commie, leftist, Demoncrat, feminazi, tree hugger, Trumper, Trumpkin, Trumpet and variations, wing nut, repugnican, facist, racist bigot, Reaganite, hatemonger, snowflakes, Nork, RINO, SJW, etc."

MOD HAT OFF​

 

[AACJ]

God does not hate.

Do you hate your children if they do something wrong or you disprove of.

Are you equating children with wrong/evil thoughts, actions, beliefs, and/or conditions? If so, then why?

 

[AACJ]

I do actually remember my 5 th grade history.
View attachment 257936
View attachment 257937
And this is Thomas Jefferson’s letter to John Adams View attachment 257938

Of course you have butchered the sentence contained in Article XI of the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, thus pulling it out of context. You have also misrepresented Thomas Jefferson's view on Christianity and its influence on America's heritage.

It is possible to further lies through omission. You are simply presenting memes, and that ineffectively.

 

[Shiloh Raven]

I do actually remember my 5 th grade history.
View attachment 257936
View attachment 257937
And this is Thomas Jefferson’s letter to John Adams View attachment 257938

I could go on and on to further dispel the belief that the United States of America was founded on Christian principles, but that would take this thread way off-topic. However, I do enjoy doing that.

 

[KarateCowboy]

Of course you have butchered the sentence contained in Article XI of the 1797 Treaty of Tripoli, thus pulling it out of context. You have also misrepresented Thomas Jefferson's view on Christianity and its influence on America's heritage.

It is possible to further lies through omission. You are simply presenting memes, and that ineffectively.

I think it's worth noting that the Treaty of Paris, which cemented our national sovereignty, was written in the name and under the authority of "the must holy and undivided Trinity"

 

[KarateCowboy]

I could go on and on to further dispel the belief that the United States of America was founded on Christian principles, but that would take this thread way off-topic. However, I do enjoy doing that.

It's worth noting that a basic understanding of civics would clear up what's going on here. Nation, state, and nation-state are different things. Saying the US was founded as a Christian nation is just historical fact. But state and nation are two different things. That seems lost on a lot of people.

 

[steve78]

Are you equating children with wrong/evil thoughts, actions, beliefs, and/or conditions? If so, then why?

No That was not my intention.I just don't agree with the term HATE. Its a very poor choice of word to describe how God feels about sin.

 

[steve78]

I will certainly be in prayer for this; either that or that God will raise rival tech companies to those of silicon company on whose platforms Christians and conservatives can freely preach their views without fear of censorship.

The reason why conservatives and Christians (individuals and organizations) still continue to use the services of google, facebook, twitter, and even pay pal is because they do not feel that there are any viable alternatives for them.

If there was, then conservatives and Christians may begin transitioning to those tech services friendly to them.

There are no viable alternatives cause what Fundies are doing today under the law, well at least here in the UK is termed a hate crime. That's why you get the censorship from these tech companies, if they don't censor then they run the risk of getting into some sort of trouble.

 

[Contenders Edge]

There are no viable alternatives cause what Fundies are doing today under the law, well at least here in the UK is termed a hate crime. That's why you get the censorship from these tech companies, if they don't censor then they run the risk of getting into some sort of trouble.

Then in that case, ways must be found bypass their censorship attempts and may God show us how. There must be a way to do that. Nothing is fool proof.

 

[steve78]

Then in that case, ways must be found bypass their censorship attempts and may God show us how. There must be a way to do that. Nothing is fool proof.

There is little that can be done. Google and twitter etc will just shut down your accounts.
It maybe better trying to campaign to change the law.

All that is needed i feel is some fundies just need to tone down the gay bashing which is rather OOT and will invoke censorship.

 

[Contenders Edge]

There is little that can be done. Google and twitter etc will just shut down your accounts.
It maybe better trying to campaign to change the law.

All that is needed i feel is some fundies just need to tone down the gay bashing which is rather OOT and will invoke censorship.

In America, our free speech and religious freedom rights are constantly under increasing attack despite the efforts of the current Presidential administration to protect them and there are an increasing number of people, especially amongst college-age people who believe there should be some speech restrictions. But again, you cannot have either a Constitutional republic or even a thriving democracy when speech is restricted. Once speech is censored, a democracy is dead and the retaining of representative governments only gives the illusion of a democracy.

If don’t like what you see on a certain television station, change the channel and if need be, don’t watch television at all. If you don’t like what you are hearing on the radio or your Sirius XM satellite network, change the dial. If you don’t like what the Pastor is preaching in church, leave. If you don’t agree with the doctrine of a certain ministry, do not give them any support. And if you don’t like the lyrics of a certain music artist, don’t buy their music.

It is a simple as that, but unfortunately, there are people who are not content with being able to choose what to read or not and what to listen to or not to listen to, but instead seek to silence those with whom they disagree.

One thing encouraging about this is that those who seek to silence us have already lost the debate because if they thought they could prevail against us with their arguments, they would see no need to silence or censor us.

 

[thecolorsblend]

The day is coming soon when YouTube will have to decide if it is a content platform or a content producer.

I say regulate them until they're crying for mercy. Then regulate them some more just to be safe.

 

[Johan_1988]

That supports the need for Conservative activism. Youtube censors will be biased against the Christian worldview because Google supports a secular humanistic worldview. It must be biased if it is to avoid censoring its own supported worldview.

Agree with you there. Apparently the people in charge are leftist. So there would be a automatic bias. The political left are trying to silence conservative Christian voices ahead of the elections. The seem to believe nobody's opinion matters but theirs. That's just totalitarianism. If someone would take it to court they would lose their case since it violates the first amendment in the constitution and they will have to clearly define what is considered hateful and not their version of hate speech.