I thought about that. If it was a D politician, I'd still think the same about the reporter. My point is I don't trust the press in general. From the recording it's impossible to tell what actually happened. Like I said, opinions.
Here's the transcript. We don't hear the beginning of the conversation, but both parties are initially calm, suggesting that nothing inflammatory has been said yet.
Jacobs: "...the CBO score because, you know, you were waiting to make your decision about healthcare until you saw the bill, and it just came out..."
Gianforte: (cutting him off) "We'll talk to you about that later."
Jacobs: "Yeah, but there's not going to be time. Just curious [unintelligible]..."
Gianforte: (cutting him off) "Speak with Shane please."
Jacobs: "But you..."[unintelligible; sounds of a scuffle]
Gianforte: "I'm sick and tired of you guys! The last time you came in here, you did the same thing! Get the hell out of here! Get the hell out of here! The last time you did the same thing! Are you with the Guardian?"
Jacobs: "Yes, and you just broke my glasses."
Gianforte: "The last guy did the same damn thing."
Jacobs: "You just body slammed me and broke my glasses."
Gianforte: "Get the hell out of here."
Jacobs: "You'd like me to get the hell out of here, and I'd also like to call the police."
[end of recording]
What problem exactly do you have with the reporter's questions? They're valid - the candidate had said he would decide after the CBO score was released, and healthcare is an important issue for the election. It's the day before the election (when this happened), so saying "later" isn't going to do voters any good. Perhaps he hadn't had a chance to review the score and come up with a statement yet. That's fine. He's an adult - he can use words to express that. "I haven't had a chance to fully review the report yet. I will make a statement in (some reasonable amount of time)." There's no need at all to resort to violence. No threats were made, no violence was perpetrated on the candidate according to both the victim of the assault and the witnesses. Was he being mildly annoying? Yes. It's his job to inform his readers, even if that requires being a little annoying. However, throwing someone to the ground and punching them is not an appropriate response to being annoyed. It doesn't matter how stressed out you are. It doesn't matter how fed up with answering questions you are. It's not appropriate or proportional.