MiGs and AK featured in 'support the troops' Trump campaign ad

[GoldenBoy89]

Have you ever heard of clear and convincing evidence? Vs. the trumped up stuff they tried.

Have you ever heard of a trial with no witness testimony admitted? The Senate ignored the evidence and avoided issuing subpoenas or hearing witnesses because they knew the evidence was damning and they didn’t want to be on the hook for it with their voters. That’s why they chose to leave it to the American public. Because they knew in the end, cynicism would win out.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Then why couldn't the entire Democratic, with million$ find impeachable criminal conduct in 3 years of investigation?

This is grammatically incoherent.

"why couldn't the entire Democratic" [what]. Democratic is an adjective it needs a noun.

So is the noun---

"party" -- Well, it wasn't the Democratic party investigating the President.

"house" -- (or better "entire Democrat-led House") OK, now we have a viable noun for this sentence. So what about it? Did they find impeachable conduct. Let's see...

Did they have an impeachment article(s)?

H.Res.755 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.

Did it pass the Democratic house?

Article 1.

Roll Call 695 Roll Call 695, Bill Number: H. Res. 755, 116th Congress, 1st Session

Article 2.

Roll Call 696 Roll Call 696, Bill Number: H. Res. 755, 116th Congress, 1st Session

Gee, it looks like the Democratic (house) did impeach on two counts.

----

List of Impeached Presidents:

(17) Andrew Johnson, 1868
(42) William J. Clinton, 1998
(45) Donald J. Trump, 2019

[Articles were also passed in committee against Richard M. Nixon in 1974, but he quit before almost certain impeachment.]

 

[Hans Blaster]

Trump is actually looking out for USA. MiG is way cheaper then F-16. It’s all about saving mighty dollar!

Or cheaper stock photos. They blew their whole campaign budget on grifting and ad-buys in DC so Il Donald sees his own ads between segments of Fox & Friends.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Get a good look at them, I’m sure they will be flying over our country if Biden wins and Trump requests help from his buddy to stay in power.

The Russians don't have the capacity to project that kind of power. They are a rotten superpower. Without their nuclear arsenal no one would really care about them militarily.

 

[essentialsaltes]

They did. The Republican Senate said they don’t care to do their jobs because it’s an “election year” so they left it to you and me to decide on the President’s guilt or innocence through the election. Thanks for reminding what a spineless cowardly act that was on their part.

The same old meaningless arguments with no, zero, none evidence.

Will this do?

Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said on NBC's "Meet the Press" that he believes President Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine to "encourage" its government to investigate the Bidens, but that he will vote to acquit Trump on Wednesday because he believes the consequences of the president's actions should be decided in the next election.

"If you have eight witnesses who say someone left the scene of an accident, why do you need nine? I mean, the question for me was: Do I need more evidence to conclude that the president did what he did? And I concluded no."

 

[wing2000]

Cool. When are we placing an order for MiG-29s?

 

[Der Alte]

Will this do?
Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) said on NBC's "Meet the Press" that he believes President Trump withheld military aid to Ukraine to "encourage" its government to investigate the Bidens, but that he will vote to acquit Trump on Wednesday because he believes the consequences of the president's actions should be decided in the next election.
"If you have eight witnesses who say someone left the scene of an accident, why do you need nine? I mean, the question for me was: Do I need more evidence to conclude that the president did what he did? And I concluded no."

Sounds like ATS to me. One guy, NOT 8, says something and everybody with ATS accept it without question. Who are these 8 and what did they say and when?

 

[Pommer]

Sounds like ATS to me. One guy, NOT 8, says something and everybody with ATS accept it without question. Who are these 8 and what did they say and when?

It was an analogy.

 

[Der Alte]

This is grammatically incoherent.
"why couldn't the entire Democratic" [what]. Democratic is an adjective it needs a noun.
So is the noun---
"party" -- Well, it wasn't the Democratic party investigating the President.
"house" -- (or better "entire Democrat-led House") OK, now we have a viable noun for this sentence. So what about it? Did they find impeachable conduct. Let's see...
Did they have an impeachment article(s)?
H.Res.755 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): Impeaching Donald John Trump, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.
Did it pass the Democratic house?
Article 1.
Roll Call 695 Roll Call 695, Bill Number: H. Res. 755, 116th Congress, 1st Session
Article 2.
Roll Call 696 Roll Call 696, Bill Number: H. Res. 755, 116th Congress, 1st Session
Gee, it looks like the Democratic (house) did impeach on two counts.
----
List of Impeached Presidents:
(17) Andrew Johnson, 1868
(42) William J. Clinton, 1998
(45) Donald J. Trump, 2019
[Articles were also passed in committee against Richard M. Nixon in 1974, but he quit before almost certain impeachment.]

You shot yourself in the foot. First you said my post was incoherent but later you clearly understood that I had inadvertently omitted the word "party."
Note to self. Scratch this guy off your list of people you respond to.
What exactly was the substance of the so-called articles? Didn't that entire Russian collusion go in the toilet?

 

[Der Alte]

It was an analogy.

An analogy of what exactly? If there was evidence of something don't you think we the people have the right to be made aware of that evidence instead of being conned with a vague analogy?
I am still waiting for the smoking gun and I haven't seen anything close except automatonic rejection of anything Trump.

 

[Pommer]

An analogy of what exactly? If there was evidence of something don't you think we the people have the right to be made aware of that evidence instead of being conned with a vague analogy?
I am still waiting for the smoking gun and I haven't seen anything close except automatonic rejection of anything Trump.

Fare thee well.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Sounds like ATS to me. One guy, NOT 8, says something and everybody with ATS accept it without question. Who are these 8 and what did they say and when?

ats?

 

[Hans Blaster]

You shot yourself in the foot. First you said my post was incoherent but later you clearly understood that I had inadvertently omitted the word "party."
Note to self. Scratch this guy off your list of people you respond to.
What exactly was the substance of the so-called articles? Didn't that entire Russian collusion go in the toilet?

Even if I have a "most likely" version of someone's poor writing, I do prefer to clarify rather than assume. As for the articles you could read them.

 

[Der Alte]

ats?

Anti Trump Syndrome. Anything Trump says is wrong.

 

[Der Alte]

Even if I have a "most likely" version of someone's poor writing, I do prefer to clarify rather than assume. As for the articles you could read them.

Did the appropriate parties make those articles of impeachment public?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Anti Trump Syndrome. Anything Trump says is wrong.

Looking at the post to which you replied with "ATS", it was an analogy about needing more witnesses (if you have 8 witnesses why do you need a 9th?) not about 1 substituting for 8. You read almost as well as you write.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Did the appropriate parties make those articles of impeachment public?

That's what those links are. The articles are House resolutions.

 

[LostMarbels]

Those are Tomcats.

 

[SimplyMe]

Those are Tomcats.

No, the horizontal stabilizers are wrong for an F-14, they give the rear of the F-14 a triangular shape. Also, the F-14s vertical stabilizers are closer together than the plane in this image. They do appear to be MIG 29s, not an F-14; the stabilizers (both horizontal and vertical) match the MIG 29.

 

[essentialsaltes]

Sounds like ATS to me. One guy, NOT 8, says something and everybody with ATS accept it without question. Who are these 8 and what did they say and when?

Somebody's got some kinda syndrome.

Republican Senator Lamar Alexander voted against calling new witnesses, because he had already seen enough to conclude that the impeachment charge against Trump was proven beyond a reasonable doubt. However, he voted to acquit, leaving the consequences up to the people in the election. This is precisely what GoldenBoy was saying.