Michael Savage Refuses To Bow To Boycott

[Zippythepinhead]

Michael Weiner aka Michael Savage refuses to budge in spite of sponsorship pulls over remarks.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/17/a...&ex=1198558800&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print

 

[Voegelin]

The New York Times, whose publisher has nearly busted his parents' company over the last decade due to what he chooses to publish, is upset because Savage hasn't been hurt by a left wing boycott.

Amusing.

 

[[serious]]

The New York Times, whose publisher has nearly busted his parents' company over the last decade due to what he chooses to publish, is upset because Savage hasn't been hurt by a left wing boycott.

Amusing.

...

you didn't read the article did you?

The program lost over 1 mill in sponsors.

 

[I Just Believe In Me]

I would rather see him go down fighting for his ignorant comments, than have him pretend to be sorry.

 

[KomissarSteve]

I would rather see him go down fighting for his ignorant comments, than have him pretend to be sorry.

Indeed; at this point, he's just begging the Left to twist the knife.

I think they'll be happy to oblige.

 

[Jacey]

I think Michael Weiner should be allowed to be as ignorant and racist as he wants to be, I don't mind him being on the air.

 

[Zippythepinhead]

I think that Weiner will be around for awhile. We kind need him. He is the "black" sheep of the conservative family. What would Mark Levin do if Weiner Nation retired?

 

[Texas Lynn]

Eventually it'll be a split verdict: Savage will be out and the other right wing hate radio shock jocks will stay in. They'll provide his head on a platter to preserve their other mouthpieces.

Don't look for him to come back soon ala Imus though; Imus, racist though his (Imus')comment was, Imus is essentially a likeable fellow, despite being incoherent and appearing to be drunk often, or maybe because of it. But Savage? Nobody likes him <staff edit>