- Jul 6, 2004
- 25,285
- 2,868
- 59
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Choosing to provoke someone is called goading.
Forgive me...
Forgive me...
Upvote
0
Yes it is and I do forgive you for doing that here.Choosing to provoke someone is called goading.
Forgive me...
OkaySeems like you are the one goading my friend
Many letters, like Philemon and 2 John, were originally personal correspondence. They were not created for any worship service.
Did it not start with Jason0047 making comments that he didn't like the way I close my posts?
Did it not start with Jason0047 making comments that he didn't like the way I close my posts?
Forgive me...
Thank you for your honesty. Of course you know well Rome says otherwise. Yet if you walk into a Roman Catholic church they will not normally refuse you communion. However, the Orthodox churches will refuse a Roman Catholic.Rome left. The Church remains.
Forgive me...
Thank you for your honesty. Of course you know well Rome says otherwise. Yet if you walk into a Roman Catholic church they will not normally refuse you communion. However, the Orthodox churches will refuse a Roman Catholic.
Now of course in Matthew 18 we are told:Looks to me like you started this thread just looking for an argument. But I guess you feel that is OK since you say forgive me at the end of every post right?
Frankly both if you mean Sacred Scriptures. The very Sacred Scriptures the apostles taught from, reproved and rebuked.Did Christ leave you a Church or a book?
Forgive me...
No, but they were included in it... mainly because when Christians worshiped on the steps of the Temple the letters would be read aloud to them at predetermined times.
All of the Epistles were copied to every Church for the repeating of them through the year. It's cyclical.
Forgive me...
They were included mostly because they were preserved better than others letters. Sadly, not all letters that were penned by the Apostles, read aloud, and even copied were preserved well enough to see their inclusion in the early church canonical lists. We know that Paul wrote more than two letters to the Corinthians, for example. But if they had been preserved better, your religious institution would be calling them Scripture too.
Don't forget to answer my other question here.
Then why do you capitalize these words in your English translation? Do you believe the phrase "holy catholic and apostolic church" is a proper noun?
Well from the beginning of the Church even the church fathers were Bible thumpers. I'm looking at Against Heresies by St Irenaeus right now. A version with embedded notes which show which Scriptures he is referring to to make his argument. Here's a sample:At what point did Christianity become dependent on the bible instead of prayer and grace dispensed through the sacraments?
Modern Christians are now worshiping their bible in lieu of attending services.
Forgive me...
Recommend you go to an Eastern Orthodox church next Sunday quote what you did above and see if they allow you to take communion with them. They have a different understanding of the "One True Church."Exactly. The creed is not about the 'Roman' church.
The Church of Antioch still exists today. The oldest Church with no interruption of her history. She is Orthodox.
Don't worry about it. I can hardly smell it from here.Forgive me...
Split? How come?