- Jul 12, 2016
- 5,417
- 5,524
- 72
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Married
The Petrine text of Matthew 16:18 was recognised in terms of the see of Rome from an early stage. The nature of how that worked in terms of the way leadership and authority works is best understood in light of Matthew 20:25 and the Council in Acts 15. That is an authority that worked in a conciliar manner with the historic see being first amongst equals. At the 1st Council of Nicaea this was easy as Rome was also the seat of Empire, but come the 1st Council of Constantinople this was more complex as Constantinople (Nova Romanum) was now the seat of Empire, and the Bishop of Constantinople was recognised as 1st after Rome. The Eastern and the Oriental Orthodox have a problem with the way they perceive that authority has be wielded outside the operation of the Councils - and notably the inclusion of the filioque clause for the enthronement of Henry II as Holy Roman Emperor on the 14th of February 1014.You wrote the following and list Matthew 16:18 for your authority, Peter the rock of the Church.
There are several Churches that value to apostolic succession or the historic episcopate, including RCC, EOC, OOC, all the other Orthodox Churches, The Anglican Communion, The Old Catholics, the Mar Thoma Church, and indeed we value and treasure this great and obvious link to the foundations of our Church in Jesus Christ our Lord.Does your church not also have a similar claim to apostolic succession as does the RCC?
I don't understand the OT remark. My feeling is that have a high view of Mary, Mother of the Lord, is sufficiently understood in embracing the story of our salvation as found in the Bible. I love you and rubbish your Mum does not work for me. Sorry, but I don't need to follow the Pope, to have a reasonable opinion of the one to whom the Angel said Hail Mary, full of grace, the Lord is with you.Make up your mind. Do you revere Mary because they did in the OT or because the authority continues in your church through Peter to "explain" all things doctrinal?
I think the movement that follows the continental reformation has moved and developed since that time, and there are many things that surprise people, like Calvin section on 'the Holy Catholic Church as a means of grace', or indeed John Wesley saying the rosary on horseback. We live in a world of many surprises.You need to study Lutheran doctrine more in order to speak for them. Having left that church after 50 years, I can say they do not believe as you about Mary. Further, I know of no Protestant church that prays to Mary.
110%We are united around Jesus and he is the head of the church as scripture says, Colossians 1:18.
A blessing on your house. I was going to have a shot at Paul for describing me and my Church as Protestant. Our classic self description is both catholic and reformed. I believe that the Elizabethan Settlement sought to secure a situation where all good christian folk could be loyal to both Church and Monarch, and that we could in the diversity of views recognised hold a common faith. In a sense it was the resolution that the Pilgrimage of Grace should have achieved, and probably would have had Cranmer not been so fearful of the mob, and Henry VIII less fearful of a Plantagenet claimant for the throne.Anglican, not really Protestant as in a byproduct of the Reformation.
Not my job, and if you will note in the OP I made zero (nil, nada, squat) reference to praying to Mary. It is quite possible that was because I have no desire or intent to make this thread contentious.list one Protestant church that prays to Mary.
Upvote
0