Mark of the Beast and salvation

Blade

Veteran
Site Supporter
Dec 29, 2002
8,167
3,991
USA
✟630,767.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Well a believer and the mark of the beast if we read before that we read "And all who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written from the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain."

If you do not worship the beast you are killed so to take the mark one has to have already worshiped the beast. And yes anyone that worships the beast and also takes it mark are lost forever no matter who you are
 
Upvote 0

Lost Witness

Ezekiel 3:3 ("Change")
Nov 10, 2022
1,694
977
38
New York
✟97,356.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
If you do not worship the beast you are killed so to take the mark one has to have already worshiped the beast. And yes anyone that worships the beast and also takes it mark are lost forever no matter who you are
The SEAL OF GOD can't be removed,
Not once does it say the Mark of the Beast can't? :scratch:
 
Upvote 0

sandman

Senior Member
Aug 17, 2003
2,458
1,642
MI
✟121,255.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Divorced
Politics
US-Constitution
Without a rapture, if you can never lose your salvation, what happens to a believer who takes the mark of the beast? Lose salvation?
You stated "if you can never lose your salvation" The believers in Revelation are not saved unconditionally like we are in this administration (dispensation) of Grace....that ceases @ the rapture.
 
Upvote 0

MetalGrand

Newbie
Feb 9, 2012
5
1
✟18,366.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
You stated "if you can never lose your salvation" The believers in Revelation are not saved unconditionally like we are in this administration (dispensation) of Grace....that ceases @ the rapture.
I believe in the rapture. I was curious on what non believers of the doctrine have to say about this issue because I don’t understand what answer could be had on that issue.
 
Upvote 0

TribulationSigns

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2017
3,485
1,045
Colorado
✟415,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Without a rapture, if you can never lose your salvation, what happens to a believer who takes the mark of the beast? Lose salvation?

If a believer got captured and went under while the so-called army of antichrists put a literal mark on the victim's right hand or forehand. Does that mean the victim automatically loses salvation?

Of course, not. Thats absurd. It is because some people got the wrong doctrines about what the mark of the beast really is. This is NOT what God talked about!
 
Upvote 0

ViaCrucis

Confessional Lutheran
Oct 2, 2011
37,427
26,867
Pacific Northwest
✟731,303.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Without a rapture, if you can never lose your salvation, what happens to a believer who takes the mark of the beast? Lose salvation?

This is one of the reasons why trying to interpret the mark of the beast as some kind of literal mark is problematic. Salvation depends solely on the work and promises of God through Jesus Christ for us.

While apostasy is very real, salvation has nothing to do with some literal "mark", but entirely to do with God's grace and Him giving, creating, and working faith in us through the Gospel (Romans 10:17, Ephesians 2:8-9). And the idea that God's word could be nullified by someone unknowingly receiving some physical mark on their body should be considered entirely absurd and inconsistent with the entire biblical witness.

A common view among many Christians and, arguably, most biblical scholars and academics, is that "the beast" of the Revelation probably refers to Nero, based on the clues that John gives us, such as that the beast's name can be numerically added up to six hundred and sixty-six, that the beast suffered a mortal wound but is brought back to life (in the form of later persecuting emperors, such as Domitian who was emperor when the Revelation was written). The case for Nero helps to also address why, going back to some of the earliest years of Christianity, the number given has a common variation: six hundred and sixteen. Essentially the name Nero Caesar adds up to 616 while Neron Caesar adds up to 666, both Nero and Neron are two forms of his name, one being the Latin form and the other the Greek form; when the name is transliterated into Semitic letters, whether Hebrew or Aramaic, it becomes NRW QSR or NRWN QSR. As mentioned, NRW QSR adds up to 616, while NRWN QSR adds up to 666. The reason why this works is because Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek, and many languages assigned numerical values to the letters of their writing system, there wasn't a separate set of symbols to represent numbers as we have today. So the Greek numeral for 1 is identical with the letter of the Greek alphabet, Alpha. So, for exmample in Hebrew and Aramaic the first letter in NRW[N] QSR is Nun, with a numerical value of 50, Resh has a value of 200, Vav has a value of 6, and so on.

In this way words and names all could have a numerical value by adding up the individiual values of each letter. It could work as a simple code. Examples of people doing this in the ancient world isn't uncommon, people could write things like, "the number of my beloved is ####", the numerical value was given which obfuscated the name. So, in this way, the name of the beast is being obfuscated by presenting its numerical value, either 666 or 616 depending on the variant manuscripts we have. John appears to suggest that his readers can figure out who he is talking (Revelation 13:18), meaning that the person/name that the figurative language of "the beast" represents is someone Christians living in the late first century knew. Remember, John wrote the Revelation to Christians living in a cluster of churches in Anatolia, specifically the Roman province of Asia which corresponds with modern south-west Turkey; the Revelation is written to Christians living in the late first century, specifically those in Asia. In the same way that Paul's letter to the Romans is written to the Christians in Rome, or the letters to the Corinthians is written to the Christians in Corinth, etc.

So that leaves the question, what is "the mark" then? Well, elsewhere in the Revelation we see that God's people also have a mark, they have God's seal. Why the forehead or right hand? This goes back to the Torah, where God through Moses instructed the Jews to have God's Law as a sign and seal upon their foreheads and right hand (which became the practice of teffilin in Judaism). C.f. Exodus 13:9, Deuteronomy 6:11, etc.

The idea of a person having a seal speaks of allegiance, covenant, of belonging-to. The Jews were, under the Old Covenant, God's people because they were sealed with the Torah, in some cases literally as in the case of circumcision. As Christians, with the New Covenant which is in Christ, we also have God's seal. In Ephesians 1 St. Paul writes that when we came to faith we were sealed with the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13). The Holy Spirit dwells in us, marks us, seals us, by God's grace and promise in the Gospel, through faith. So the people of God have a seal, a mark, in that they belong to God, we are God's because we belong to Christ and the Holy Spirit indwells us. So that through faith we are God's people, the children of Abraham, etc.

Likewise, then, those whose allegiance is to, who belong to, the beast also bear his name and mark; even as we who belong to Christ bear His name and mark.

The essence, then, is that to worship the beast or his image (which is quite literal in the context of ancient Rome, people were literally expected to regard the emperors as divine and to offer sacrifices or other religious oblations to the emperor and his image) is to belong to, be marked as, the property of the beast. One cannot belong to both Christ and Caesar, one cannot worship God and idols. For we have one God, and one Lord, even as we are one Body, and there is one Spirit, one faith, one baptism, etc. We belong to Christ alone, our Lord, we are His people, sealed in Him and by Him, as children of God and heirs of the promise.

-CryptoLutheran
 
Upvote 0

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,490
8,995
Florida
✟324,290.00
Country
United States
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Without a rapture, if you can never lose your salvation, what happens to a believer who takes the mark of the beast? Lose salvation?

Looking at it for what it is, or was, accepting the mark of the beast was to worship the Emperor as a god. Most people put in that position simply did it and got it over with, but faithful Christians would not, and would be put to death for it. Though some were only prevented from engaging in trade of any sort. To worship the Emperor was to commit idolatry, a mortal sin. Doing so made one an apostate and they were excommunicated from the Church. That continued on until the last Roman persecution when the Church decided that even an apostate could be brought back into the Church after a period of penance. The penance normally lasted for seven to ten years.

You can see a "mark of the beast" here:

 
Upvote 0

alertandawake

Active Member
Aug 20, 2017
279
129
Sydney
✟56,270.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Without a rapture, if you can never lose your salvation, what happens to a believer who takes the mark of the beast? Lose salvation?
Well if a believer took the mark of the beast, then by definition they are a unbeliever/disbeliever.
 
Upvote 0